Neuroscience research articles are provided.
What is neuroscience? Neuroscience is the scientific study of nervous systems. Neuroscience can involve research from many branches of science including those involving neurology, brain science, neurobiology, psychology, computer science, artificial intelligence, statistics, prosthetics, neuroimaging, engineering, medicine, physics, mathematics, pharmacology, electrophysiology, biology, robotics and technology.
– These articles focus mainly on neurology research. – What is neurology? – Definition of neurology: a science involved in the study of the nervous systems, especially of the diseases and disorders affecting them. – Neurology research can include information involving brain research, neurological disorders, medicine, brain cancer, peripheral nervous systems, central nervous systems, nerve damage, brain tumors, seizures, neurosurgery, electrophysiology, BMI, brain injuries, paralysis and spinal cord treatments.
What is Psychology? Definition of Psychology: Psychology is the study of behavior in an individual, or group. Psychology news articles are listed below.
Artificial Intelligence articles involve programming, neural engineering, artificial neural networks, artificial life, a-life, floyds, boids, emergence, machine learning, neuralbots, neuralrobotics, computational neuroscience and more involving A.I. research.
Robotics articles will cover robotics research press releases. Robotics news from universities, labs, researchers, engineers, students, high schools, conventions, competitions and more are posted and welcome.
Genetics articles related to neuroscience research will be listed here.
Neurotechnology research articles deal with robotics, AI, deep learning, machine learning, Brain Computer Interfaces, neuroprosthetics, neural implants and more. Read the latest neurotech news articles below.
NIH-funded global study suggests novel approach for preventing repeated cardiovascular events.
Pioglitazone, a drug used for type 2 diabetes, may prevent recurrent stroke and heart attacks in people with insulin resistance but without diabetes. The results of the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke (IRIS) trial, presented at the International Stroke Conference 2016 in Los Angeles and published in the New England Journal of Medicine, suggest a potential new method to prevent stroke and heart attack in high-risk patients who have already had one stroke or transient ischemic attack. This large, international study was supported by the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS).
The IRIS trial is the first study to provide evidence that a drug targeting cell metabolism may prevent secondary strokes and heart attacks even before diabetes develops. Insulin regulates metabolism and keeps blood sugar levels from getting too high, along with many other processes, in the body. Insulin resistance is a condition in which the body produces insulin but does not use it effectively.
“This study represents a novel approach to prevent recurrent vascular events by reversing a specific metabolic abnormality thought to increase the risk for future heart attack or stroke,” said Walter J. Koroshetz, M.D., director of the NINDS.
“The IRIS trial supports the value of more research to test the vascular benefits of other interventions such as exercise, diet and medications that have similar effects on metabolism as pioglitazone,” said Walter N. Kernan, M.D. professor of general medicine at Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and lead author of the study.
More than 3000 patients from seven countries who had experienced an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack within the previous six months were randomized to receive pioglitazone or placebo for up to five years in addition to standard care. Ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks can occur when a cerebral blood vessel becomes blocked, cutting off the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to brain tissue.
In this study, stroke or heart attack occurred in 9 percent of participants taking pioglitazone and 11.8 percent of patients on placebo, which was a relative decrease of 24 percent. The results suggest that 28 strokes or heart attacks may be prevented for every 1000 patients who take pioglitazone for up to five years.
Insulin resistance is a hallmark of type 2 diabetes but also occurs in more than 50 percent of people with ischemic stroke who do not have diabetes. People with diabetes are known to have increased risk of stroke. Previous research suggested that insulin resistance increases risk for stroke, but the IRIS trial was the first to treat it and suggested that the therapy reduced the risk of recurrent stroke and heart attacks. However, pioglitazone is not FDA-approved for the uses studied in the IRIS trial.
In this study, pioglitazone also reduced the risk of diabetes by 52 percent in the study participants.
The study evidenced an additional known side effect of the drug, which is an increased risk of bone fractures. To help doctors and patients choose the best strategy for preventing recurring strokes, future studies will attempt to identify a person’s risk of bone fractures due to pioglitazone. As approved for use in medical practice, the drug also carries additional side effects (drug label).
“More research is needed to determine the mechanisms by which pioglitazone decreases risk for stroke and heart attack and increases bone fracture risk, with the hope of developing strategies that maximize benefit and minimize serious side effects in our patients,” said Dr. Kernan.
[divider]About this neurology research[/divider]
Funding: This work was supported by the NINDS (NS04486)
Source: Barbara McMakin – NINDS/NIH Image Source: The image is credited to NINDS. Original Research: Abstract for “Pioglitazone after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack” by Walter N. Kernan, M.D., Catherine M. Viscoli, Ph.D., Karen L. Furie, M.D., M.P.H., Lawrence H. Young, M.D., Silvio E. Inzucchi, M.D., Mark Gorman, M.D., Peter D. Guarino, Ph.D., Anne M. Lovejoy, P.A.-C., Peter N. Peduzzi, Ph.D., Robin Conwit, M.D., Lawrence M. Brass, M.D., Gregory G. Schwartz, M.D., Ph.D., Harold P. Adams, Jr., M.D., Leo Berger, M.D., Antonio Carolei, M.D., Wayne Clark, M.D., Bruce Coull, M.D., Gary A. Ford, M.B., B.Chir., Dawn Kleindorfer, M.D., John R. O’Leary, M.A., Mark W. Parsons, M.D., Peter Ringleb, M.D., Souvik Sen, M.D., J. David Spence, M.D., David Tanne, M.D., David Wang, M.D., and Toni R. Winder, M.D. for the IRIS Trial Investigators in New England Journal of Medicine. Published online February 17 2016 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1506930
Pioglitazone after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
BACKGROUND Patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at increased risk for future cardiovascular events despite current preventive therapies. The identification of insulin resistance as a risk factor for stroke and myocardial infarction raised the possibility that pioglitazone, which improves insulin sensitivity, might benefit patients with cerebrovascular disease.
METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 3876 patients who had had a recent ischemic stroke or TIA to receive either pioglitazone (target dose, 45 mg daily) or placebo. Eligible patients did not have diabetes but were found to have insulin resistance on the basis of a score of more than 3.0 on the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index. The primary outcome was fatal or nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction.
RESULTS By 4.8 years, a primary outcome had occurred in 175 of 1939 patients (9.0%) in the pioglitazone group and in 228 of 1937 (11.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the pioglitazone group, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.93; P=0.007). Diabetes developed in 73 patients (3.8%) and 149 patients (7.7%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.69; P<0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.17; P=0.52). Pioglitazone was associated with a greater frequency of weight gain exceeding 4.5 kg than was placebo (52.2% vs. 33.7%, P<0.001), edema (35.6% vs. 24.9%, P<0.001), and bone fracture requiring surgery or hospitalization (5.1% vs. 3.2%, P=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients without diabetes who had insulin resistance along with a recent history of ischemic stroke or TIA, the risk of stroke or myocardial infarction was lower among patients who received pioglitazone than among those who received placebo. Pioglitazone was also associated with a lower risk of diabetes but with higher risks of weight gain, edema, and fracture. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00091949.)
“Pioglitazone after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack” by Walter N. Kernan, M.D., Catherine M. Viscoli, Ph.D., Karen L. Furie, M.D., M.P.H., Lawrence H. Young, M.D., Silvio E. Inzucchi, M.D., Mark Gorman, M.D., Peter D. Guarino, Ph.D., Anne M. Lovejoy, P.A.-C., Peter N. Peduzzi, Ph.D., Robin Conwit, M.D., Lawrence M. Brass, M.D., Gregory G. Schwartz, M.D., Ph.D., Harold P. Adams, Jr., M.D., Leo Berger, M.D., Antonio Carolei, M.D., Wayne Clark, M.D., Bruce Coull, M.D., Gary A. Ford, M.B., B.Chir., Dawn Kleindorfer, M.D., John R. O’Leary, M.A., Mark W. Parsons, M.D., Peter Ringleb, M.D., Souvik Sen, M.D., J. David Spence, M.D., David Tanne, M.D., David Wang, M.D., and Toni R. Winder, M.D. for the IRIS Trial Investigators in New England Journal of Medicine. Published online February 17 2016 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1506930
[divider]Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.[/divider]