How Decision-Making Improves with Age

Summary: Adolescents are known for making less optimal, noisy decisions, but a recent study reveals that these tendencies decrease with age and are linked to improvements in complex decision-making skills. Researchers found that decision noise, or variability in choices, mediates age-related gains in goal-directed behaviors and adaptability.

Adolescents may rely on less efficient strategies due to limited cognitive resources, which makes them more susceptible to emotional and motivational influences. These findings shed light on the computational mechanisms behind developmental shifts in decision-making and open avenues for understanding neurodevelopmental disorders.

Key Facts:

  • Adolescents show higher decision noise, making suboptimal choices.
  • Decreased decision noise in adults is linked to improved planning and adaptability.
  • Developmental changes in brain areas influence cognitive control and decision strategies.

Source: PLOS

Adults exhibit a general tendency to make better decisions than adolescents, and this improvement drives an increase in specific and more sophisticated choice behaviors, according to a study published November 14th in the open-access journal PLOS Biology by Vanessa Scholz and Lorenz Deserno from the University of Würzburg, Germany, and colleagues.

Learning and decision-making change considerably from adolescence into adulthood. Adolescents undergo developmental changes in specific choice behaviors, such as goal-directed behaviors and motivational influences over choice. They also consistently show high levels of decision noise, i.e., choosing suboptimal options.

This shows a brain.
The findings suggest that unspecific noise mediates the development of highly specific functions or strategies. Credit: Neuroscience News

However, it remains unknown whether these observations – the development of specific and more sophisticated choice processes and higher decision noise – are independent or related. It is possible that the development of specific choice processes might be impacted by age-dependent changes in decision noise.

To test this idea, Scholz, Deserno, and colleagues analyzed data from 93 participants between 12 and 42 years of age.

The participants completed three reinforcement learning tasks: a task assessing motivational influences over choices, a learning task capturing adaptive decision-making in response to environmental changes, and a task measuring goal-directed behavior.

The results revealed that noise levels were strongly correlated across reinforcement learning tasks. Critically, noise levels mediated age-dependent increases in more sophisticated choice behaviors and performance gains. The findings suggest that unspecific noise mediates the development of highly specific functions or strategies.

One reason for these mediation effects could be a limited availability of cognitive resources in adolescents due to the ongoing development of brain areas related to cognitive control.

Having fewer cognitive resources might make adolescents more prone to rely on computationally cheaper decision strategies, rendering them more susceptible to emotional, motivational and social influences.

Overall, the study provides novel insights into the computational processes underlying developmental changes in decision-making.

According to the authors, future work may unravel the neural basis as well as the developmental and clinical real-life relevance of decision noise for neurodevelopmental disorders.

The authors add, “Teenagers make less optimal, so-called ‘noisy’ decisions. While these noisy decisions decrease when growing older, this decrease is also linked to the development of improved complex decision-making skills, such as planning and flexibility.”

About this neurodevelopment and decision-making research news

Author: Claire Turner
Source: PLOS
Contact: Claire Turner – PLOS
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.
Decrease in decision noise from adolescence into adulthood mediates an increase in more sophisticated choice behaviors and performance gain” by Vanessa Scholz et al. PLOS Biology


Abstract

Decrease in decision noise from adolescence into adulthood mediates an increase in more sophisticated choice behaviors and performance gain

Learning and decision-making undergo substantial developmental changes, with adolescence being a particular vulnerable window of opportunity. In adolescents, developmental changes in specific choice behaviors have been observed (e.g., goal-directed behavior, motivational influences over choice).

Elevated levels of decision noise, i.e., choosing suboptimal options, were reported consistently in adolescents.

However, it remains unknown whether these observations, the development of specific and more sophisticated choice processes and higher decision noise, are independent or related. It is conceivable, but has not yet been investigated, that the development of specific choice processes might be impacted by age-dependent changes in decision noise.

To answer this, we examined 93 participants (12 to 42 years) who completed 3 reinforcement learning (RL) tasks: a motivational Go/NoGo task assessing motivational influences over choices, a reversal learning task capturing adaptive decision-making in response to environmental changes, and a sequential choice task measuring goal-directed behavior.

This allowed testing of (1) cross-task generalization of computational parameters focusing on decision noise; and (2) assessment of mediation effects of noise on specific choice behaviors.

Firstly, we found only noise levels to be strongly correlated across RL tasks. Second, and critically, noise levels mediated age-dependent increases in more sophisticated choice behaviors and performance gain.

Our findings provide novel insights into the computational processes underlying developmental changes in decision-making: namely a vital role of seemingly unspecific changes in noise in the specific development of more complex choice components.

Studying the neurocomputational mechanisms of how varying levels of noise impact distinct aspects of learning and decision processes may also be key to better understand the developmental onset of psychiatric diseases.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. That’s interesting. But I feel like it also has a lot to do with when people first starts to employ empathy in their lives and when they’ve been alive long enough to understand that actions can have far reaching consequences that can like really detriment or improve their life or other people’s lives.

    I have a pet theory that can’t even really be confirmed or falsified so take from it what you will but I think this relates to people who (1) are famous as adults (2) who became famous as children or who were the children of famous people (3) have careers involving something that is not academically/intellectually rigorous, and also that doesnt involve physical drudgery. So think athletes, celebrities, politicians, second generation executives, etc.

    A lot of these people seem to do things that are kind of juvenile that most adults would not ever do because they’ve learned that doing those things could damage their image which could harm their future prospects. If you’re a Drake or Lebron James or something it doesn’t really matter if you make the choice to do something or say something that’s kind of juvenile because you’re success isn’t really determined by you your maturity at that point like you’re either a brand or your skill is all that matters. Magnus Carlsen is another good example of someone like this because he’s super good at chess so he can kind of be an a●●●●● and it doesn’t matter because he’s still going to beat you at chess.

    But the point of all that is that people have to have experiences making bad choices and then experience the consequences of them or see other people experience that and then relate that experience to themselves but someone who’s in a position where they cannot relate because they’re in such a different tier of society will not learn anything from seeing that happen to someone else

  2. What is decision noise? Is it confusing information? Bothersome information? Misleading information? It must be jargon.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *