Cannabis Impacts Brain Plasticity via Astrocyte Receptors

Summary: Researchers discovered that cannabis affects brain development by interacting with CB1 receptors on astrocytes, not just neurons. Using a mouse model, they showed that removing these receptors impaired the brain’s ability to adapt during critical periods of plasticity, particularly in the visual cortex.

This highlights how astrocytes, often seen as supportive cells, play a direct role in early brain flexibility. The findings suggest that disrupting CB1 receptor activity during development, such as through cannabis use, may have long-term impacts on learning and brain function.

Key Facts:

  • CB1 receptors on astrocytes regulate brain plasticity during early development.
  • Mice without these receptors showed reduced adaptability in critical periods.
  • Disrupted CB1 activity may explain cannabis risks to adolescent brain development.

Source: KNAW

Neuroscientist Rogier Min from the Amsterdam UMC has collaborated with Christiaan Levelt’s lab from the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience and discovered how brain cells may react to cannabis, along its potential impact on our brain’s flexibility.

Cannabis binds to the so-called Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1-receptor), one of the most common receptors in our brain. CB1-receptors serve as switches that can turn various biological processes on or off.

Video credit: Neuroscience News

Under normal circumstances, the CB1-receptors are activated by cannabis-like substances that are produced in the brain. For a long time, CB1-receptors were believed to be situated only on nerve cells (neurons), but the team has shown that another player is involved as well: astrocytes.

Astrocytes are a type of glia cell in the brain and spinal cord. These cells play an important supportive role in the nervous system. The team discovered that the CB1-receptors located on these cells play an important role in how the brain develops, especially in one’s earlier years.

The researchers specifically looked at a process known as plasticity – which is how the brain adjusts and changes. At younger ages, there are certain periods when the brain has heightened plasticity, meaning that it can adapt and change more easily. This is known as the critical period.

What was investigated?

Christiaan Levelt: ‘In earlier studies from the 80s, researchers injected astrocytes from a kitten into the visual cortex of an older cat, the brain area involved in vision. As a result, the critical period was opened once more, meaning that the brain could adjust more easily again.

‘We also know that the CB1-receptor in astrocytes is expressed less and less as we age. Could there be a link here? And could this mean that the CB1-receptor on astrocytes play a role in this critical period plasticity?’

To investigate this, the team used a special mouse model in which the CB1-receptors of specific cells were turned off: either only on the nerve cells, or only on the astrocytes. They examined whether the absence of the receptor influenced the development of the inhibitory system in the brain.

This shows astrocytes and leaves.
To investigate this, the team used a special mouse model in which the CB1-receptors of specific cells were turned off: either only on the nerve cells, or only on the astrocytes. Credit: Neuroscience News

Our brain consists of both stimulating and inhibitory nerve cells. We need the inhibitory cells, also known as interneurons, to keep our brain activity balanced. This study focused on the visual cortex, the part of the brain that helps us process what we see.

What were the findings?

The researchers discovered that removing the CB1-receptors from astrocytes meant that the brain could less easily adjust to changes during development. Rogier Min: ‘we found this by temporarily covering the eye of a young mouse during the critical period for vision.

‘In normal mice, their brain is capable of adapting to this by strengthening the connection to the ‘good eye’. Mice without CB1-receptors on the interneurons seemed to follow a similar adaptability as the control mice.

‘However, in the mice without CB1-receptors on the astrocytes this adaptability didn’t work effectively. These findings show that astrocytes in particular, and not nerve cells, play an important role in this process, which is surprising. ‘

Why is this important?

This research helps us better understand how the brain develops. It can also help us explain how cannabis-use at a younger age can introduce some risks.

Studies looking at the long-term effects of cannabis on the brain are not conclusive. But there are indicators that, if the CB1-receptor is disturbed during brain development, there may be problems with learning, memory, or other brain functions.

While young children usually don’t use cannabis, teenagers and young adults are a particular risk group. Their brains are then still developing: especially the prefrontal cortex, the part that is involved in planning and decision-making’.

Min continues: ‘The CB1 receptor is involved in numerous processes in the brain. It’s actually extraordinary that the binding of cannabis to the CB1-receptor doesn’t typically result in big problems.

‘Our research could explain some negative consequences of cannabis: the CB1-receptor on astrocytes appears to be an important player in early brain development, and disrupting this process can impact the amount that our brain can adjust.

‘While cannabis is often seen as relatively safe, it can still influence brain development at younger ages. Now we have a slightly better impressions of how and why that happens.’

About this cannabis and neuroplasticity research news

Author: Eline Feenstra
Source: KNAW
Contact: Eline Feenstra – KNAW
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.
Inhibitory maturation and ocular dominance plasticity in mouse visual cortex require astrocyte CB1 receptors” by Christiaan Levelt et al. iScience


Abstract

Inhibitory maturation and ocular dominance plasticity in mouse visual cortex require astrocyte CB1 receptors

Endocannabinoids, signaling through the cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R), regulate several forms of neuronal plasticity.

CB1Rs in the developing primary visual cortex (V1) play a key role in the maturation of inhibitory circuits.

Although CB1Rs were originally thought to reside mainly on presynaptic axon terminals, several studies have highlighted an unexpected role for astrocytic CB1Rs in endocannabinoid mediated plasticity.

Here, we investigate the impact of cell-type-specific removal of CB1Rs from interneurons or astrocytes on development of inhibitory synapses and network plasticity in mouse V1.

We show that removing CB1Rs from astrocytes interferes with maturation of inhibitory synaptic transmission.

In addition, it strongly reduces ocular dominance (OD) plasticity during the critical period. In contrast, removing interneuron CB1Rs leaves these processes intact.

Our results reveal an unexpected role of astrocytic CB1Rs in critical period plasticity in V1 and highlight the involvement of glial cells in plasticity and synaptic maturation of sensory circuits.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. Why invest so much effort to skew the data with misleading titles if there wasn’t actually data worth investigating when it comes to the subject?

  2. There is no ention of cannabis in original paper and the mice did not smoke cannabis nor been exposed..and its not called cb1 receptor for no reason as 99,8% similarity between THC and Anandamide is no coincidence…you liars ,who payed you for this?

  3. Well if cannabis only impaired the receptors during use it’s not quite the same as removing them from the brain this scare nonsense for heavy regulations and it’s misleading.

  4. Yeah, problem with that is we are not mice. That’s puffer mentality. They would water a garden all at once disregarding specific instructions for each plant, dig.

  5. I would love to see them prove this hypothesis by administering cannabis to the mice and compare the response. Until then this is just an opinion article.

  6. So no cannabis was used in the study at all? It was a brain study in mice and they adapted their findings to posit that cannabis could possibly have this effect. Sounds legit.

  7. An interesting piece of the puzzle. What the authors miss however, is that going from murine astrocyte CB1R involvement in brain plasticity during development to recommendations of caution about cannabis use in teenagers is a hell of a leap! Not only that, they have shown that the absence of these receptors causes problems in vivo, which is presumably akin to an inhibitor of THC, not a mimic. Drug stigma strikes again!

  8. You people disgust me nobody in their right mind on the planet would give marijuana to a f****** child…. Yet you want to torture mice in their brain to find out s*** that should be obvious I mean do you really have to waste money on tests to spout this result.

  9. Ah, what a fucking masterpiece of pedantic academic back-patting this is. Let’s take a moment to dissect the sheer audacity of presenting this as earth-shattering news, shall we? Because apparently, the groundbreaking revelation here is that brain cells other than neurons exist and – gasp – they matter. You don’t say! A quick round of applause for scientists confirming that the brain isn’t just a fleshy Ethernet switch exclusively for neurons.

    Oh, so CB1 receptors aren’t just for neurons? Shocking. This might be news to anyone still reading neuroscience textbooks from 1974, but for the rest of us, the notion that astrocytes have active roles in brain function has been well-documented for years. But hey, let’s repack this as “new” because it’s tied to cannabis, and nothing grabs headlines faster than weed apparently breaking your brain.

    They’ve managed to reduce “critical period plasticity” to “brain flexibility in mice.” Bravo. And their test for this? Covering a mouse’s eye and waiting for the brain to “adapt.” This is where I imagine the mice giving the researchers side-eye with their uncovered one. What’s next? Testing plasticity by tickling the mice to see how quickly they flinch?

    The fact that astrocytes might influence plasticity isn’t revolutionary; it’s long been suspected. What’s glaring here is how this discovery is twisted to support the narrative that cannabis disrupts brain development—because you can’t fund research without scaring parents about stoners.

    The article dances a fine line between science and moral panic. Sure, cannabis interacts with CB1 receptors. Yes, adolescence is a critical period for brain development. But do they connect these facts with hard, irrefutable evidence? No. Instead, they tiptoe around causation with vague statements like, “There are indicators that cannabis could disrupt learning and memory.” Indicators? If I see flashing lights, I have “indicators” of a UFO, but that doesn’t make it Roswell.

    What’s particularly delightful here is how astrocytes are suddenly the scapegoat for any adverse effects of cannabis. Previously, the blame lay squarely on neurons and the reward systems they modulate. Now, it’s the astrocytes’ turn to take one for the team. I can’t wait for the next study to claim cannabis somehow influences brain function through, I don’t know, cerebrospinal fluid.

    The conclusion reads like a passive-aggressive parental lecture: Cannabis might influence brain development! Astrocytes are important! Think of the teenagers! But the link between cannabis use and measurable cognitive decline remains as elusive as a good argument in an anti-vaping campaign. Without solid, reproducible evidence, all they’ve done is turn a small piece of mouse-based research into a public health cautionary tale.

    Final Take:

    This article’s tone suggests it’s less about understanding astrocytes and more about feeding the eternal fire of cannabis moral panic. Sure, the research is interesting, but the leap from “astrocytes influence plasticity” to “don’t smoke weed, kids!” is laughably desperate. If you’re going to vilify cannabis, at least have the decency to do it with better evidence than covering a mouse’s eye and writing a dramatic abstract.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *