Large-Scale Generation of Muscle-Controlling Nerve Cells From ALS Patients

Summary: A person’s sex is one of the main drivers of altered gene expression in motor neurons, regardless of whether they were derived from patients diagnosed with ALS. Male ALS stem cells generated significantly more motor neurons than the control group, however, this was not seen in female samples.

Source: Cedar Sinai Medical Center

A new Cedars-Sinai study in collaboration with the University of California, Irvine (UCI) and the Answer ALS consortium has examined the expression of thousands of genes in stem cell generated motor neurons that are known to die in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a fatal neurological disorder known as ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease. 

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Neuron, revealed sex was one of the main drivers of different gene expression in motor neurons, regardless of whether they were from patients diagnosed with ALS. 

“This is the first time that nearly 450 lines of stem cells have been simultaneously differentiated and turned into motor neurons from patients with ALS and healthy controls,” said Clive Svendsen, PhD, executive director of the Cedars-Sinai Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute and professor of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, who is co-senior and co-corresponding author of the study.

“This was a collaborative effort with incredibly hard-working teams of scientists across many laboratories to provide a vital resource for the ALS community.”   

The discovery is the first set of in-depth findings that stem from Answer ALS, one of the largest resources for ALS biological samples in the world. Answer ALS is part of a collaborative effort with over 100 scientists that includes biological and clinical data from more than 1,000 ALS patients. 

The data is generated from patient stem cells that are then turned into motor neurons, the nerve cells responsible for muscle function. These motor neurons give researchers a better understanding of the mechanisms of the fatal disease and can potentially help lead to the development of new therapeutics that target specific cells and pathways. 

The samples are available to researchers through the Cedars-Sinai iPSC Core and Biomanufacturing Center, which is led by Dhruv Sareen, PhD, co-corresponding author of the study, the executive director of the Cedars-Sinai Biomanufacturing Center and associate professor of Biomedical Sciences.

While the approach of using human stem cells to model a disease isn’t the first, no one has ever analyzed this many stem cell lines from patients with ALS. 

ALS is a complex disease that remains poorly understood with no known cure. The disease causes damage to motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord, leading to the loss of muscle control and ultimately movement.

Currently, there is no medical treatment that effectively targets the fatal disease, other than measures—like respirators or feeding tubes—to help patients be more comfortable.  

To understand why ALS happens and identify distinct molecular signatures of ALS in men and women, the team used 341 stem cell lines from ALS patients, which were differentiated into motor neurons, along with 92 lines from a healthy control group. 

Leslie Thompson, PhD, co-corresponding author of the study and Bren professor of Psychiatry and Human Behavior and Neurobiology and Behavior at UCI, and her team performed and analyzed RNA sequencing that can measure the expression of up to 32,000 genes in each sample. This gives the teams the ability to detect gene patterns that may be affected by the disease and to see if there were any signals that would separate ALS patients from healthy controls.

Instead of finding prominent differences related to ALS, the team found striking differences between males and females, regardless of whether they were diagnosed with ALS. The investigators also were surprised to find that the male ALS stem cells generated significantly more motor neurons than the control group, but this was not observed with stem cells from females.

“We hypothesized that we would see differences in gene expression between ALS and healthy control groups, but the changes were subtle” said Michael Workman, PhD, a project scientist in the Svendsen Laboratory and co-first author of the study. “However, when we analyzed males and females separately, some specific changes in gene expression were seen—particularly in male ALS samples.”

Previous studies using this approach have only used a few lines and often not balanced their experiments for male and female subjects. Only doing this at such a large scale revealed that sex was one of the main drivers of different gene expression in motor neurons.

This shows neurons
The data is generated from patient stem cells that are then turned into motor neurons, the nerve cells responsible for muscle function. Image is in the public domain

“It is known that women are less likely to get ALS than men, and if they do get diagnosed with it, it’s generally a little later in life and affects different sets of motor neurons,” said Svendsen, who is also the Kerry and Simone Vickar Family Foundation Distinguished Chair in Regenerative Medicine. “Now that we have discovered gene expression patterns that can distinguish male and female motor neurons, it may help with designing therapies in the future.”

Investigators plan to continue analyzing the data that is continuously being collected and deposited into the Answer ALS online, open-source portal. All of the data described in the resource paper is available for scientists to download, and the stem cells are available through the Cedars-Sinai iPSC Core.

“The take-home message is that these big data sets and large numbers of ALS and control stem cell lines are now available to the ALS community to use and look for new causes and treatments for this devastating disease,” Svendsen said.

The study was a collaborative project with Answer ALS and UCI. Dhruv Sareen, PhD and Leslie Thompson PhD were co-senior authors, and Ryan Lim, PhD, and Jie Wu, PhD, both from UCI, were co-first authors.

About this genetics and ALS research news

Author: Denise Heady
Source: Cedar Sinai Medical Center
Contact: Denise Heady – Cedar Sinai Medical Center
Image: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Open access.
Large-scale differentiation of iPSC-derived motor neurons from ALS and control subjects” by Clive Svendsen et al. Neuron


Abstract

Large-scale differentiation of iPSC-derived motor neurons from ALS and control subjects

Highlights

  • Large-scale generation and differentiation of control and ALS iPSCs to motor neurons
  • Patient sex and cell culture composition are significant sources of variation
  • Male ALS cultures have more motor neurons and enrichment of stress-related pathways
  • Deposition of data and cell lines into public repository with additional multi-omics

Summary

Using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to understand the mechanisms of neurological disease holds great promise; however, there is a lack of well-curated lines from a large array of participants. Answer ALS has generated over 1,000 iPSC lines from control and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients along with clinical and whole-genome sequencing data.

The current report summarizes cell marker and gene expression in motor neuron cultures derived from 92 healthy control and 341 ALS participants using a 32-day differentiation protocol.

This is the largest set of iPSCs to be differentiated into motor neurons, and characterization suggests that cell composition and sex are significant sources of variability that need to be carefully controlled for in future studies.

These data are reported as a resource for the scientific community that will utilize Answer ALS data for disease modeling using a wider array of omics being made available for these samples.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.