Screen time associated with behavioral problems in preschoolers

Summary: Two or more hours of screen time is associated with inattention problems in preschool-aged children.

Source: University of Alberta

A new Canadian study of more than 2,400 families suggests that among preschoolers, spending two hours or more of screen time per day is linked to clinically significant behavioural problems.

Compared with children who had less than 30 minutes per day of screen time, children who were exposed to more than two hours of screen time per day were five times more likely to exhibit clinically significant “externalizing” behavioural problems such as inattention; and over seven times more likely to meet the criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Piush Mandhane, associate professor of pediatrics in the University of Alberta’s Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, led the study, which was published today in the journal PLOS ONE.

“We found that screen time had a significant impact at five years of age,” said Mandhane. “Current Canadian guidelines call for no more than two hours of screen time a day at that age. But our research suggests that less screen time is even better.”

The research used data from the CHILD Cohort Study, a national birth cohort study collecting a wide range of health, lifestyle, genetic and environmental exposure information from nearly 3,500 children and their families from pregnancy to adolescence. Mandhane leads the Edmonton site of the CHILD Cohort Study.

Parents reported their child’s total screen time per day, including watching TV and DVD’s, and using computers, video consoles, smartphones and tablets. On average, three-year-old children spent 1.5 hours of screen time per day; for 42 per cent of the three-year-olds, their viewing time exceeded the Canadian recommended screen-time guideline of less than one hour per day. At age five, children spent, on average, 1.4 hours of screen time per day; for 13 per cent of the five-year-olds, their viewing time exceeded the Canadian recommendation of less than two hours per day.

The study also assessed child behaviour and attention at age five by having parents complete the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), a screening measure for a variety of problems such as anxiety and depression, emotional reactivity, inattention, aggressiveness, and sleep disturbances.

“Prior to this, there weren’t a lot of data out there that asked the questions, ‘How much is too much? Are the guidelines appropriate? Ultimately, will limiting screen time in preschool years have benefits for a child’s development?’ This study gives parents some of those answers,” added the study’s first author Sukhpreet Tamana, an AllerGen Highly Qualified Personnel and a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Alberta.

“The two big takeaways from this study are that children exposed to more screen time, at either age three or five years, showed significantly greater behavioural and attention problems at age five, and that this association was greater than any other risk factor we assessed, including sleep, parenting stress, and socioeconomic factors,” added Tamana.

The researchers also identified factors that provided protection from the negative effects of screen time. Good quality sleep had a small impact, while participation in organized sports was found to have a highly significant protective effect.

“Interestingly, it wasn’t physical activity on its own that was protective; the activity needed to have structure,” said Mandhane. “And the more time children spent doing organized sports, the less likely they were to exhibit behavioural problems.”

“A lot of the things that you do through organized activities are really important for young kids early on,” noted Tamana.

“It sets the stage for development amongst children. I think in lieu of screen time, it would be beneficial for parents to increase opportunities for other structured activities instead.”

The study did not determine if the media content itself (educational, video gaming, social media) or screen type (television, computer, tablet) were important predictors of behavioral problems, though the team plans to examine those questions more fully in future research.

This shows the researchers and some children
Sukhpreet Tamana (left) and Piush Mandhane pose with children participating in the CHILD Cohort Study. The researchers found that among preschoolers, spending two hours or more of screen time per day is linked to clinically significant behavioural problems. The image is credited to Jordan Carson.

While the researchers suggest “less is more” when it comes to screen time amongst preschool-aged children, they do not advocate for eliminating it entirely.

“Our data suggests that between zero and 30 minutes a day is the optimal amount of screen time,” said Mandhane. “The preschool period is an ideal time for education on healthy relationships with screens, and we believe our data shows that you can’t start too early.”

About this neuroscience research article

Source:
University of Alberta
Media Contacts:
Ross Neitz – University of Alberta
Image Source:
The image is credited to Jordan Carson.

Original Research: Open access.
“Screen-time is associated with inattention problems in preschoolers: Results from the CHILD birth cohort study”
Sukhpreet K. Tamana, Victor Ezeugwu, Joyce Chikuma, Diana L. Lefebvre, Meghan B. Azad, Theo J. Moraes, Padmaja Subbarao, Allan B. Becker, Stuart E. Turvey, Malcolm R. Sears, Bruce D. Dick, Valerie Carson, Carmen Rasmussen, CHILD study Investigators , Jacqueline Pei, Piush J. Mandhane PLOS ONE doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213995

Abstract

Screen-time is associated with inattention problems in preschoolers: Results from the CHILD birth cohort study

Background
Pre-school children spend an average of two-hours daily using screens. We examined associations between screen-time on pre-school behavior using data from the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) study.

Methods
CHILD participant parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) at five-years of age. Parents reported their child’s total screen-time including gaming and mobile devices. Screen-time was categorized using the recommended threshold of two-hours/day for five-years or one-hour/day for three-years. Multiple linear regression examined associations between screen-time and externalizing behavior (e.g. inattention and aggression). Multiple logistic regression identified characteristics of children at risk for clinically significant externalizing problems (CBCL T-score≥65).

Results
Screen-time was available for over 95% of children (2,322/2,427) with CBCL data. Mean screen-time was 1·4 hours/day (95%CI 1·4, 1·5) at five-years and 1·5 hours/day (95%CI: 1·5, 1·6) at three-years. Compared to children with less than 30-minutes/day screen-time, those watching more than two-hours/day (13·7%) had a 2·2-point increase in externalizing T-score (95%CI: 0·9, 3·5, p≤0·001); a five-fold increased odd for reporting clinically significant externalizing problems (95%CI: 1·0, 25·0, p = 0·05); and were 5·9 times more likely to report clinically significant inattention problems (95%CI: 1·6, 21·5, p = 0·01). Children with a DSM-5 ADHD T-score above the 65 clinical cut-off were considered to have significant ADHD type symptoms (n = 24). Children with more than 2-hours of screen-time/day had a 7·7-fold increased risk of meeting criteria for ADHD (95%CI: 1·6, 38·1, p = 0·01). There was no significant association between screen-time and aggressive behaviors (p>0.05).

Conclusion
Increased screen-time in pre-school is associated with worse inattention problems

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. Anita, can you please provide some links to research that supports your statement? Thank you.

  2. Limited screen time, which enhances a child’s co-relation to the ongoing topics, helps a child in visualisation & understanding them in an easier & better way.

  3. I’m curious why the recommendation would NOT be to eliminate screens completely before age 6. If the research shows that more screen time is detrimental at ages 3 and 5 and that 0-30 minutes of screens per day is best, why would we unnecessarily expose young children to any screen time at all? Since there is no data presented that show early introduction of screens helps create the “healthy relationship with screens” these researchers are advocating, why would we assume that some screens at at this age is better than none? It feels like that line was thrown in there because they fear parents can’t handle hearing that screens are not good for their children, not because any data actually backs that up. It’s one thing to say, we can’t avoid screens entirely in the world in which we live and that sometimes parents feel they must rely on them to get a break etc (which I totally understand and agree with), but actually recommending screen time at these young ages seems a bit ridiculous based on the data presented here, IMO.

Comments are closed.