Loss of a Pet Can Potentially Trigger Mental Health Issues in Children

Summary: Children who experience the death of a pet may experience long-lasting and profound grief, which could lead to subsequent mental health problems. Researchers found strong emotional attachment to a pet may result in measurable psychological distress that serves as an indicator of depression in children and adolescents for three years or more after their animal dies.

Source: Mass General

The death of a family pet can trigger a sense of grief in children that is profound and prolonged, and can potentially lead to subsequent mental health issues, according to a new study by researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH).

In a paper appearing in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, the team found that the strong emotional attachment of youngsters to pets might result in measurable psychological distress that can serve as an indicator of depression in children and adolescents for as long as three years or more after the loss of a beloved pet.

“One of the first major losses a child will encounter is likely to be the death of a pet, and the impact can be traumatic, especially when that pet feels like a member of the family,” says Katherine Crawford, CGC, previously with the Center for Genomic Medicine at MGH, and lead author of the study.

“We found this experience of pet death is often associated with elevated mental health symptoms in children, and that parents and physicians need to recognize and take those symptoms seriously, not simply brush them off.”

Roughly half of households in developed countries own at least one pet. And as the MGH investigators reported, the bonds that children form with pets can resemble secure human relationships in terms of providing affection, protection and reassurance. What’s more, previous studies have shown that children often turn to pets for comfort and to voice their fears and emotional experiences.

While the increased empathy, self-esteem and social competence that often flow from this interaction is clearly beneficial, the downside is the exposure of children to the death of a pet which, the MGH study found, occurs with 63 percent of children with pets during their first seven years of life.

This shows a little girl and a puppy
What’s more, previous studies have shown that children often turn to pets for comfort and to voice their fears and emotional experiences. Image is in the public domain.

Prior research has focused on the attachment of adults to pets and the consequences of an animal’s death. The MGH team is the first to examine mental health responses in children. Their analysis is based on a sample of 6,260 children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), in Bristol, England. This population-based sample is replete with data collected from mothers and children that enabled researchers to track the experience of pet ownership and pet loss from a child’s early age up to eight years.

“Thanks to this cohort, we were able to analyze the mental and emotional health of children after examining their experiences with pet death over an extended period,” notes Erin Dunn, ScD, MPH, with the MGH Center for Genomic Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, and senior author of the study.

“And we observed that the association between exposure to a pet’s death and psychopathology symptoms in childhood occurred regardless of the child’s socio-economic status or hardships they had already endured in their young lives.”

Researchers also learned that the relationship between pet death and increased psychopathology was more pronounced in male than female children—a finding that surprised them in light of prior research—and that the strength of the association was independent of when the pet’s death occurred during childhood, and how many times or how recently it occurred. According to Dunn, this latter finding speaks to “the durability of the bond with pets that is formed at a very early age, and how it can affect children across their development.”

The MGH study stressed the importance of parents, caregivers and pediatricians recognizing and taking seriously the short- and long-term psychological reactions of children to the death of a pet—reactions which can mimic a child’s response to the loss of other important family members.
“Adults need to pay attention to whether those feelings are deeper and more profound and if they’re lasting longer than might have been expected,” says Crawford.

“They could be signs of complicated grief and having someone to talk to in a sympathetic or therapeutic way may be extremely helpful for a child who is grieving.”

About this psychology research article

Source:
Mass General
Contacts:
Press Office – Mass General
Image Source:
The image is in the public domain.

Original Research: Closed access
“The mental health effects of pet death during childhood: is it better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?” by Katherine M. Crawford et al. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.


Abstract

The mental health effects of pet death during childhood: is it better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?

Pet ownership is common. Growing evidence suggests children form deep emotional attachments to their pets. Yet, little is known about children’s emotional reactions to a pet’s death. The goal of this study was to describe the relationship between experiences of pet death and risk of childhood psychopathology and determine if it was “better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all”. Data came from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a UK-based prospective birth cohort (n = 6260). Children were characterized based on their exposure to pet ownership and pet death from birth to age 7 (never loved; loved without loss; loved with loss). Psychopathology symptoms at age 8 were compared across groups using multivariable linear regression. Psychopathology symptoms were higher among children who had loved with loss compared to those who had loved without loss (β = 0.35, p = 0.013; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.63), even after adjustment for other adversities. This group effect was more pronounced in males than in females. There was no difference in psychopathology symptoms between children who had loved with loss and those who had never loved (β = 0.20, p = 0.31, 95% CI = −0.18–0.58). The developmental timing, recency, or accumulation of pet death was unassociated with psychopathology symptoms. Pet death may be traumatic for children and associated with subsequent mental health difficulties. Where childhood pet ownership and pet bereavement is concerned, Tennyson’s pronouncement may not apply to children’s grief responses: it may not be “better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all”.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive the latest neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email daily from NeuroscienceNews.com
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. We do not sell email addresses. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. Hey there,
    I think it’s completely true, dogs are not just a pet, they are part of the family.
    I’ve seen many dogs, and I don’t think there is any other pet more faithful than the dog. Just like losing a friend or family member can cause a serious heartbreak, and cause mental illness, losing a pet dog can cause serious psychological issues.

    An adult can get over these types of traumas easily, but on the other hand, it’s very much difficult for kids to move on.

  2. The framing of this article is disturbing to me. It seems to take a natural phenomenon, attachment to a pet, and make it into something pathological. And it seems to take a normal reaction, sadness and loss after the loss of a pet, and pathologize that as well, making feeling sad about losing a pet a “mental health issue.”

    Of COURSE kids are sad if they lose an important pet! And it is hardly surprising that this loss can last for an extended period of time. It is common with the loss of a loved one that it takes a year before the loss fully sets in for some people, while others recover more quickly. It seems to me to be pretty normal that people (and children ARE people, too!) take different amounts of time to recover from losses, and have different levels of attachment to both people and animals in their household. Why make it into a “mental illness” when a child is deeply saddened by the loss of a valued family member?

    Let’s quite pathologizing normal behavior!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *