Summary: Researchers say many children, especially girls, aren’t taught basic motor skills like throwing or running. The researchers are developing an improved movement curriculum to increase motor skill competence in preschool aged children.
Source: University of Michigan.
“You throw like a girl” is a sexist taunt that can instantly sour a kid on athletics and other healthy activities.
But many children–mainly girls–simply aren’t taught or don’t learn the basic motor skills like throwing, running, jumping or dribbling, say University of Michigan researchers.
To change this, Leah Robinson, associate professor at the U-M School of Kinesiology, and colleagues developed a movement curriculum to increase physical activity and motor skills competence in preschoolers by letting them choose among activities. A recent feasibility study suggests that it works.
The study compared the physical activity behaviors of 72 preschoolers who were placed in either a traditional movement program or Robinson’s CHAMP curriculum, which stands for Children’s Health Activity Motor Program.
The researchers found that the CHAMP boys and girls spent roughly two more minutes per day walking and in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity than the children in the traditional movement program, and two fewer minutes standing around. Also, CHAMP children spent more time in skills practice and less time on management and learning.
However, boys in both programs still spent about two fewer minutes standing and nearly two more minutes in vigorous daily activity, compared to girls.
“If you think about it, over an academic year, two minutes a day could make a major difference,” Robinson said.
The researchers aren’t sure why boys in CHAMP moved more than girls, but Robinson believes the focus on basic motor skills has been ignored. This can lead to a lack of competence and confidence in girls’ ability to perform these skills, she says, and could be one reason they get less physical activity than boys.
“We’re talking about basic movements: dribbling, running, skipping, hopping, jumping. Many people think these skills develop naturally, but they need to be proactively taught and reinforced,” she said.
While schools still teach these fundamentals, physical education programs are slowly diminishing, and they’re not required at all in preschool.
“The development of these core motor skills is a contributing factor to a healthy lifestyle and physical activity,” she said.
Robinson focuses on preschoolers because only half of 3-to-5-year-olds get the recommended three hours of exercise a day, she says, and more boys meet the requirement than girls.
“The data show that the rate of obesity is still increasing in that age group, and physical activity goals are rarely met,” she said.
And, the earlier girls are taught basic motor skills, the better the chances of closing the gap between the sexes, she says.
In the study, each child participated in a 30-minute movement program twice a week for nine weeks. In the CHAMP sessions, which are structured on the principle that children learn motor skills better if they can decide how to participate, preschoolers choose between several skill stations and varying levels of difficulty. The traditional program has identical content but children aren’t given choices.
Many teachers are leery of giving preschoolers so many activity choices, and Robinson concedes it’s chaotic at first, but if teachers implement the curriculum in pieces and in short bouts, kids catch on in a couple weeks.
“Teachers can start thinking and considering giving even small opportunities for choices,” said Robinson, who noted that activity stations are common in preschools–just not with movement-related activities.
The next step is a five-year NIH-funded study examining the effect of the CHAMP curriculum on the motor skills and activity of 300 Ypsilanti preschoolers who will be tracked through second grade. Researchers also want to explore self-regulation and autonomy, including the effect of CHAMP on factors like attention, memory and other classroom behaviors.
In another study, Robinson’s group found that CHAMP children scored higher on attention tasks, compared to kids in story time, and on exercise days CHAMP children performed twice as well as on sedentary days.
“These are acute benefits in terms of cognitive gains and health-related improvements,” Robinson said. “It shows that through movement we can improve outcomes that are critical to the learning environment and children’s health, but it’s important to know if these outcomes are sustainable over time.
About this neuroscience research article
Source: Laura Bailey – University of Michigan Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com. Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain. Original Research:Abstract for “The Effect of CHAMP on Physical Activity and Lesson Context in Preschoolers: A Feasibility Study” by Leah E. Robinson, Kara K. Palmer, E. Kipling Webster, Samuel W. Logan & Katherine M. Chinn in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Published April 4 2018. doi:10.1080/02701367.2018.1441966
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]University of Michigan “Throw Like a Girl? No, He or She Hasn’t Been Taught.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 5 June 2018. <https://neurosciencenews.com/motor-skill-learning-9261/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]University of Michigan (2018, June 5). Throw Like a Girl? No, He or She Hasn’t Been Taught. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved June 5, 2018 from https://neurosciencenews.com/motor-skill-learning-9261/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]University of Michigan “Throw Like a Girl? No, He or She Hasn’t Been Taught.” https://neurosciencenews.com/motor-skill-learning-9261/ (accessed June 5, 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
The Effect of CHAMP on Physical Activity and Lesson Context in Preschoolers: A Feasibility Study
Purpose: This feasibility study compared the effects of 2 movement programs, traditional and mastery climate (i.e., the Children’s Health Activity Motor Program [CHAMP]), on lesson context and children’s physical activity (PA) levels. A secondary aim was to examine sex differences in PA levels in both programs.
Method: Seventy-two preschoolers served as participants and were assigned to a movement program. Physical activity levels and lesson context were assessed with the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time.
Results: Preschoolers in CHAMP spent more time walking (p < .05, d = 3.3), more time in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA; p < .05, d = 3.6), and less time standing (p < .05, d = 3.8) compared with those in a traditional movement program. Boys in both programs spent less time standing (p < .05, d = 4.8) and more time in vigorous activity (p < .05, d = 5.8) and MVPA (p < .05, d = 4.4) compared with girls. During CHAMP, children spent less time engaged in management and knowledge (p < .05, d = 1.4, and p < .001, d = 0.9, respectively) and more time in skill practice (p < .05, d = 1.5).
Conclusion: The findings support that participation in CHAMP elicits more MVPA in preschool-age children compared with a traditional movement program. The Children’s Health Activity Motor Program provided children with more class time devoted to skill practice. The program appears to be an innovative approach that is beneficial for PA engagement and could contribute positively to children’s health.