Multiple Factors, Not Just Mental Illness, Tied to Gun Possession By Youths

A fatal high school shooting in October near Seattle reignited a long-running national debate about gun safety, mental illness and minors. An important major study, published Nov. 5 by researchers at NYU Langone Medical Center and TC, contributes new insights to the discussion, including the finding that “multiple risk behaviors, beyond more commonly discussed indicators of poor mental health…are associated with gun possession among youth.”

The study’s authors are Kelly V. Ruggles, Research Scientist with the Department of Population Health and the Center for Health Informatics and Bioinformatics at NYU Langone Medical Center; and Sonali Rajan, Assistant Professor of Health Education at Teachers College.

Ruggles and Rajan identified more than 40 different behavioral factors other than mental illness that are strongly associated with gun possession. These include heroin use, substance use on school property, having been injured in a fight, and having been a victim of sexual violence.

The study uncovered this new information by applying the latest computational methodologies to nationally representative data from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This image shows a photo of Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd's 'No Violence'. It is a gun with the front tied in a knot.
Previous research confirms that stricter gun control efforts are effective in curbing gun violence and substantially reducing the number of firearm-related injuries and deaths. This image is for illustrative purposes only and shows a photo of Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd’s ‘No Violence’ sculpture in Sweden. Credit Francois Polito.

“Although these results do not imply causality, these computational methods allowed us to approach this complex social issue without bias to better understand risk factors that are likely to simultaneously occur,” the researchers write. “It is our hope that this study will help shift the rhetoric around gun violence, identify potential points of intervention, and help reframe research priorities. We believe that this study will provide a meaningful contribution towards addressing the gun violence solution in the United States.”

To define “gun possession,” the researchers used data culled from the answers of high school-age respondents who were asked whether they had carried a gun in the last 30 days. The gun could have been obtained through various means, including taking one from their home that had been legally purchased by an adult, or illegally purchasing a firearm.

Previous research confirms that stricter gun control efforts are effective in curbing gun violence and substantially reducing the number of firearm-related injuries and deaths. However, as the authors note: “implementing effective gun control-related policy changes are complex and politically difficult to legislate in the short term.” Thus, this study focused not on the means by which guns were obtained but rather the prevalence of and behavioral factors associated with gun possession among American youth.

This work has become particularly important in recent years given that researchers who want to study gun violence have been hindered in part by the moratorium on federal funding for gun violence prevention research, which was first imposed by Congress in 1996. This study adds significant knowledge to the field in regard to better identifying and understanding the behavioral components associated with gun possession, in particular those factors that may increase the likelihood of gun possession among children and adolescents.

The study, “Gun Possession among American Youth: A Discovery-Based Approach to Understanding Gun Violence,” is also significant because of its breadth and sample size. Ruggles and Rajan used nationally representative data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. Taking 5 million unique data points over a 10-year period (2001 to 2011), they looked at 55 risk behaviors, assessed which behaviors are likely to occur together, and calculated which combinations were more likely to occur with gun possession.

The research suggests more work is needed to find clues for where to target future prevention efforts, they write in their study, which was published in PLOS ONE.

About this Psychology research

Contact: Press Office – Columbia University
Source: Columbia University press release
Image Source: The image is credited to Francois Polito and is licensed Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Original Research: Full open access research for “Gun Possession among American Youth: A Discovery-Based Approach to Understand Gun Violence” by Kelly V. Ruggles and Sonali Rajan in PLOS ONE. Published online November 5 2014 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111893

Open Access Neuroscience Abstract

Gun Possession among American Youth: A Discovery-Based Approach to Understand Gun Violence

Our study uncovered the multidimensional nature of gun possession across nearly five million unique data points over a ten year period (2001–2011). Specifically, we automated odds ratio calculations for 55 risk behaviors to assemble a comprehensive table of associations for every behavior combination. Downstream analyses included the hierarchical clustering of risk behaviors based on their association “fingerprint” to 1) visualize and assess which behaviors frequently co-occur and 2) evaluate which risk behaviors are consistently found to be associated with gun possession. From these analyses, we identified more than 40 behavioral factors, including heroin use, using snuff on school property, having been injured in a fight, and having been a victim of sexual violence, that have and continue to be strongly associated with gun possession. Additionally, we identified six behavioral clusters based on association similarities: 1) physical activity and nutrition; 2) disordered eating, suicide and sexual violence; 3) weapon carrying and physical safety; 4) alcohol, marijuana and cigarette use; 5) drug use on school property and 6) overall drug use.

“Gun Possession among American Youth: A Discovery-Based Approach to Understand Gun Violence” by Kelly V. Ruggles and Sonali Rajan in PLOS ONE. Published online November 5 2014 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111893.

Share this Psychology News
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. It is fun to watch mental midgets, make up your own data to prove your point and let facts never cause a problem with an argument. Look around the country, the cities and states with the toughest restictions on obtaining, keeping and using guns have the highest death rates. Do not worry about our Freedons as Americans, because what you take from my rights will open the door to take away yours.

    Help the mentally ill and do not steal my rights in their name. Use real facts and look around, Any person who gives up their rights for safety deserve neither.

    I will be damned if I will let Billionaires buy my rights to serve themselves, especially when they are wrong.

    1. I believe that the problem starts in the home. Young people are so use to getting every thing they want handed to them how, when , and why they want it, that whenever something does not go the way they want,or the parent tries to correct them, with all the violenve on TV the first thing they think about is revenge. They will confront their so called atagonist with nothing but a weapon that makes them more powerfull than the ones they are confronting. I feel WE as parents are just as much to blame as anyone. I still believe also, that guns do not kill, people kill.

  2. No gun–no gun violence… Wow that is complicated. We ought to get over the notion that these school psycho shooters are mentally ill; they are cold blooded sociopathic killers. The level of planning that goes into obtaining a gun, envisioning in the mind’s eye how the carnage is to happen–all of that represents pathological killer, not mental illness.

  3. The author staes: “Previous research confirms that stricter gun control efforts are effective in curbing gun violence and substantially reducing the number of firearm-related injuries and deaths.” I think that is a false statement and I would like to see the research.

  4. This article started out very interesting and then the author could help but Hijack it with hi opinion and ideology. Such a shame. PS if your going to say something in a research article you need to back it up with a footnote. We had Columbine during the first gun ban and the FBI did not have any indication that it had an effect on the illegal ownership and or illegal use of firearms. We are currently at a 30 yr low in all types of violence. Stick to neuroscience dude.

  5. Drug use on school property could definitely identify a student with aberrant behaviors! That seems to be self destructive and counter-productive to learning. The use of snuff? That seems like someone who doesn’t care about himself, either. Would they not be a signal of low self esteem and possibly a target for bullying?

Comments are closed.