A password will be e-mailed to you.

Anger and Sadness May Cause Real Pain as Well as Being a Result of It

Summary: Exploring the relationship between emotion and pain in rheumatoid arthritis, researchers report emotions may function as a stressor, promoting inflammation and causing pain symptoms.

Source: Penn State.

While emotions such as anger or sadness are often thought of as being a result of stress or pain, findings recently published by Penn State researchers suggest that negative or mixed emotions could function as stressors themselves.

The manuscript, published in the journal Psychological Reports on Sept. 6, examines the relationship between emotion and pain among women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

“We often think of emotion as a consequence of stress or pain, but our findings suggest that under certain circumstances negative emotion or complex, mixed emotion can function as a stressor itself, and one which can promote inflammation,” said Jennifer Graham-Engeland, associate professor of biobehavioral health and lead author of the manuscript.

Graham-Engeland and her colleagues hypothesized that inflammation – a physiological phenomenon for which biomarkers from blood can be obtained – may be connected to emotion and pain. They developed a novel methodology and used it to test how emotional state, such as anger, sadness or happiness, affected inflammatory response to a pain stimulus.

“The more we understand the connection between emotion and pain the more we can develop newer options for treatment as well as bolster the argument that psychological treatments are needed for pain,” Graham-Engeland said.

Study participants each came for a five-hour visit on four separate occasions to the Clinical Research Center at Penn State. These visits varied only by the manipulation of emotion (anger, sadness or happiness versus a non-emotional control visit). To manipulate emotion, researchers had participants think, write and talk about their recent feelings related to one of these specific emotions.

After the emotion manipulation, acute pain was caused by pressing on tender or swollen joints of participants, such as what might be done during a routine clinical exam. Blood samples were then obtained at multiple time points, including at baseline, ten minutes, one hour, and 100 minutes after the pain stimulus.

There was no main effect of experimental condition; however, when participants reported greater anger than their own average, they showed elevated inflammation, Graham-Engeland said.

“These findings are in concordance with a few recent studies suggesting that emotional states can cause or contribute to specific patterns of physiological responses to stress or pain,” said Graham-Engeland.

Researchers also found that when negative emotion was experienced in the context of a manipulation for a different emotion — for example, if participants felt sadness when researchers were trying to get them to focus on angry feelings — they showed elevated levels of both inflammation and the stress hormone cortisol.

a depressed looking woman

“The more we understand the connection between emotion and pain the more we can develop newer options for treatment as well as bolster the argument that psychological treatments are needed for pain,” Graham-Engeland said. NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain.

Such work is important because a more nuanced understanding of the role of emotion, psychological stress and pain on inflammatory states may eventually help clarify novel clinical tools to treat inflammation and pain or help improve current pain management techniques, Graham-Engeland said.

Though these findings relate specifically to patients with RA, Graham-Engeland said in the future this work can potentially inform other pain patients.

“I’m optimistic this may turn out to be relevant more broadly,” she said. “Additional research is needed to advance the findings of this preliminary research, both among the clinical and healthy populations.”

About this neuroscience research article

Funding: The research was funded by grants from the Penn State University Social Science Research Institute and the National Institutes of Health.

Source: Marjorie S. Miller – Penn State
Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com.
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain.
Original Research: Abstract for “Emotional State Can Affect Inflammatory Responses to Pain Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Preliminary Findings” by Jennifer E. Graham-Engeland, Sunmi Song, Ambika Mathur, David A. Wagstaff, Laura Cousino Klein, Courtney Whetzel, William T. Ayoub in Psychological Reports. Published Spetember 6 2018.
doi:10.1177/0033294118796655

Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
Penn State”Anger and Sadness May Cause Real Pain as Well as Being a Result of It.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 10 September 2018.
<http://neurosciencenews.com/emotion-physical-pain-9835/>.
Penn State(2018, September 10). Anger and Sadness May Cause Real Pain as Well as Being a Result of It. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved September 10, 2018 from http://neurosciencenews.com/emotion-physical-pain-9835/
Penn State”Anger and Sadness May Cause Real Pain as Well as Being a Result of It.” http://neurosciencenews.com/emotion-physical-pain-9835/ (accessed September 10, 2018).

Abstract

Emotional State Can Affect Inflammatory Responses to Pain Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Preliminary Findings

People differ in how quickly they learn information and how long they remember it, yet individual differences in learning abilities within healthy adults have been relatively neglected. In two studies, we examined the relation between learning rate and subsequent retention using a new foreign-language paired-associates task (the learning-efficiency task), which was designed to eliminate ceiling effects that often accompany standardized tests of learning and memory in healthy adults. A key finding was that quicker learners were also more durable learners (i.e., exhibited better retention across a delay), despite studying the material for less time. Additionally, measures of learning and memory from this task were reliable in Study 1 (N = 281) across 30 hr and Study 2 (N = 92; follow-up n = 46) across 3 years. We conclude that people vary in how efficiently they learn, and we describe a reliable and valid method for assessing learning efficiency within healthy adults.

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive the latest neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email daily from NeuroscienceNews.com
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. We do not sell email addresses. You can cancel your subscription any time.
No more articles