Summary: Researchers developed a personalized DNA cancer vaccine that has shown promising results in an early-stage clinical trial for glioblastoma.
The study demonstrates that the vaccine, GNOS-PV01, is safe and elicits a broad immune response that appears to increase survival rates in patients with particularly aggressive, “unmethylated” forms of this incurable brain cancer.
Key Research Findings
- The DNA Platform Advantage: Unlike previous vaccines, this DNA-based platform allows for the targeting of up to 40 unique cancer proteins (neoantigens) per patientโdouble the capacity of any previous cancer vaccine.
- Transforming “Cold” to “Hot”: Glioblastoma is typically a “cold” tumor, meaning it hides from the immune system. This vaccine transforms the tumor environment into a “hot” one, making it susceptible to immune-mediated attack.
- Broad Target Coverage: By targeting a wide range of neoantigens across different regions of the tumor, the vaccine prevents the cancer from “escaping” the immune system even if the tumor evolves to lose specific targets.
- Survival Milestones:
- One Year: Two-thirds of participants survived one year, compared to the historical average of 40%.
- Two Years: One-third of participants were still alive at the two-year mark, doubling historical survival rates.
- Long-Term: One patient remains recurrence-free nearly five years after her initial diagnosis.
- Safe Integration: The vaccine caused no serious side effects and was administered alongside standard-of-care radiation and post-operative recovery.
Source: WUSTL
A personalized vaccine to treat glioblastoma, a fast-growing and incurable brain cancer that affects four in 100,000 people in the U.S., is safe and elicits robust and broad immune responses that appears to increase recurrence-free survival in a subset of patients after surgery, according to an early-stage clinical trial co-led by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.
In patients with an especially aggressive form of glioblastoma, the vaccine caused no serious side effects and prolonged patientsโ overall survival compared to historical outcomes after standard-of-care surgery and chemo-radiotherapy. One long-term survivor remains recurrence-free nearly five years later.
The results of the phase 1 trial, conducted atย Siteman Cancer Center, based at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and WashU Medicine, were published May 12 in Nature Cancer. The study was led jointly by Mass General Brigham and Geneos Therapeutics, a Philadelphia-based biotechnology company.
โWe are extremely encouraged by these results,โ saidย Tanner M. Johanns, MD, PhD, lead author of the study and an assistant professor in the Division of Oncology in the John T. Milliken Department of Medicine at WashU Medicine.
โThis kind of vaccine is a first for glioblastoma, and it is exciting to think how we can leverage this individualized therapeutic DNA cancer vaccine platform to make a positive impact on the lives of patients who are fighting this disease. Additionally, combination therapies leveraging this personalized platform are currently being investigated at WashU to test if outcomes may be improved further.โ
The novel treatment uses engineered DNA molecules designed to stimulate the patientโs immune system against the cancer. Each patientโs tumor has unique proteins specific to that tumor, and this vaccine activates the patientโs immune system to recognize those proteins and eliminate the tumor cells.
Johanns said that although some immunotherapies targeting glioblastoma have shown promise in previous studies, they ultimately are ineffective in significantly delaying or preventing recurrence. Thatโs likely because glioblastoma can evolve and escape immune attack, but Johannsโ vaccine was designed to help the immune system recognize many different targets on cancer cells. So even if the tumor loses several of these targets, the vaccine is still able to generate responses to many others.
Additionally, glioblastoma is termed a โcoldโ tumor, meaning that the tumor environment is able to hide from the immune system. The cancer vaccine that was used in this trial, developed by Geneos Therapeutics, transforms cold tumors into โhotโ tumors that are then susceptible to immune-mediated eradication.
The vaccine is thus able to improve the patientโs immune response by targeting proteins on the cancer cell and by making the environment within the tumor more favorable to immune activation.
โWe chose a DNA-based platform because it would allow us an opportunity to target more cancer proteins than any vaccine had targeted before,โ said Johanns, who treats patients at Siteman and is a research member there.
โOur thinking was that if we could generate a broader range of immune responses against those proteins then it may lead to a more potent vaccine compared to other vaccine platforms with more limited protein targets.โ
This DNA-based vaccine platform was able to activate each patientโs immune system to seek out as many as 40 cancer proteins specific to each patientโs tumor โ twice as many as had been targeted by any cancer vaccine therapy to date.
More targets, more chances for success
The vaccine in the study, called GNOS-PV01, targets so-called neoantigens โ proteins unique to an individual patientโs cancer cells that their immune cells can recognize. The neoantigens were identified and selected using an algorithm developed at WashU Medicine by computational biologists and co-authorsย Obi Griffith, PhD, a professor of medicine, andย Malachi Griffith, PhD, an associate professor of medicine, both in theย Division of Oncologyย and research members at Siteman.
Johanns and his colleagues selected neoantigens from different regions of a patientโs tumor, a method they incorporated to further increase the number of cancer cell proteins targeted by the vaccine.
A vaccine platform using a different DNA-based technologyย developed for breast cancerย by co-authorย William Gillanders, MD, the Mary Culver Distinguished Professor of Surgery at WashU Medicine who treats patients at Siteman, inspired the idea to bring Geneosโ GNOS-PV01 vaccine to WashU Medicine for use against glioblastoma, Johanns said.
The trial enrolled nine adult patients who had been recently diagnosed with glioblastoma. All patients were treated at Siteman Cancer Center. The team prepared a synthetic DNA molecule encoding the unique information for each patientโs tumor neoantigens.
The vaccine was manufactured at theย Biologic Therapy Core Facilityย at Siteman during the patientโs post-operative recovery and subsequent radiation treatment.
The vaccine injections started, on average, 10 weeks after the patientโs surgery and were administered every three weeks for a nine-week period, and then every nine weeks thereafter as long as patients were able to participate. All participants, except one who was taking an immune-suppressing steroid, showed an increase in immune-cell activity indicating a response to the vaccine intervention.
Two-thirds of the patients had no progression of their cancer six months out from their surgeries, and two-thirds survived one year. Typically, around 40% of glioblastoma patients reach either milestone.
One-third of the participants were still alive after two years, which is twice the historical survival rate for this patient population. One participant is still alive and recurrence-free today, almost five years after her initial diagnosis.
An investment in the future
Kim Garland is a retired school nurse who lives in Kirkwood, Missouri, with Scott, her husband of 31 years. In June 2021, at age 62, Kim was volunteering at a youth camp in Ironton, Missouri, when her daughter-in-law, also volunteering at the same camp, noticed that Kim was struggling with confusion and forgetfulness, as well as headaches that would come and go throughout the day.
โI was forgetting things, things that should have been very obvious,โ said Kim.
A scan at a local hospitalโs emergency room back in St. Louis revealed a 6.5-centimeter mass in Kimโs brain โ about the size of a small avocado. Within the week,ย Albert Kim, MD, PhD, the August A. Busch, Jr. Professor of Neurological Surgery at WashU Medicine, director of theย Brain Tumor Centerย at Siteman, and co-author of the study, performed the initial surgery to remove her tumor. The grim diagnosis of grade 4 glioblastoma came after the tumor was removed.
When offered the opportunity to participate in a clinical trial, Kim Garland agreed in hopes that her participation would improve future treatments. After receiving this prognosis, both Kim and Scott did not expect that she would be alive with no recurrence nearly five years after her initial diagnosis.
โWe know we are fortunate to have the kind of care that Kim has been able to receive, just a 30-minute drive from our home,โ Scott said. โWe see many other patients who are traveling long distances for their treatments. Having this level of care and treatment so close to home has been a huge blessing.โ
With the support of their team, the couple have gained the confidence to make longer-term plans, including a long-delayed vacation this summer and spending quality time with their children and 15 grandchildren โ a big change from the week-by-week life they were living in the aftermath of Kimโs initial diagnosis.
โCancer vaccines have a long history, and the development of personalized neoantigen-targeting therapeutic vaccines now represents a highly compelling approach in glioblastoma and in other cancers,โ said co-senior author Gavin Dunn, MD, PhD, a neurosurgical oncologist at Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute.
โThese programs require a high degree of integrated teamwork, and we are fortunate to have collaborated with many dedicated team members in this effort.โ
Kim Garlandโs cancer, along with those of the other patients in the trial, was an unmethylated MGMT subtype of glioblastoma, which is particularly hard to treat because it is not responsive to available treatment options such as chemotherapy.
Johanns said the next step is to assess the vaccineโs efficacy in a larger group of patients, and to expand the treatment to all types of glioblastomas. The goal of Johanns and his team is to improve the vaccine response to ensure that more patients can experience benefits like those experienced by Kim Garland.
The knowledge that their participation in the trial has potentially advanced care is a comfort to the Garlands, who still need to steel themselves before each follow-up appointment, out of concern that Kimโs tumor could yet return.
โWhat weโre hopeful for is that through research like this, someday, when another person hears the words โyou have glioblastomaโ as their diagnosis, it will not cause as much anxiety,โ said Scott.
โMaybe, they will be told โthis is the cancer you have, but it is very treatable.โ We are fortunate and blessed to be at the right place and at the right time, to be part of this clinical trial and have a small part in the battle against this terrible disease.โ
Funding: Funding for this study came from the Mark Foundation for Cancer Research Momentum Fellowship, National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) grants R01NS117149 and R01 NS107833, the Nationwide Foundation Pediatric Innovation Fund, NIH K12CA167540 and The Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center Investment Program along with The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital, NIH NINDS R01NS112712 and The Schnuck Family Fund and The Knight and Christopher Davidson Family Fund. Additional study support for development, manufacture, and administration of the treatment and monitoring of the immune responses was provided by Geneos Therapeutics. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
R.P.L., J.Y., N.C., A.P.P., S.R., J.P., and N.Y.S are either current or previous Geneos Therapeutics employees.
Key Questions Answered:
A: Scientists sequence the patient’s specific tumor to identify unique proteins called neoantigens. Using a computational algorithm, they select up to 40 of these targets and engineer a synthetic DNA molecule that teaches the patient’s immune cells to recognize and eliminate those specific cancer cells.
A: It is highly evasive and “cold,” meaning it creates an environment that suppresses immune activity. It also evolves rapidly; if a treatment targets only one or two proteins, the cancer can simply “stop” producing those proteins to survive. This vaccine’s broad targeting makes that much harder.
A: This specific trial focused on unmethylated MGMT glioblastoma, which is the hardest to treat because it doesn’t respond to standard chemotherapy. The next phase of research aims to test the vaccine in a larger, more diverse group of patients across all glioblastoma types.
Editorial Notes:
- This article was edited by a Neuroscience News editor.
- Journal paper reviewed in full.
- Additional context added by our staff.
About this brain cancer research news
Author:ย Mark Reynolds
Source:ย WUSTL
Contact:ย Mark Reynolds โ WUSTL
Image:ย The image is credited to Neuroscience News
Original Research:ย Open access.
โAdjuvant personalized multivalent neoantigen DNA vaccination induces tumor-specific immune responses in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patientsโ by Garfinkle EAR, Perales-Linares R, Gimple RC, Livingstone AJ, Kaleigh F. Roberts KF, Butt OH, Goedegebuure. SP, McLellan MD, Chang GS, Hundal J, Yan J, Navarro JB, Paxton SA, Chattopadhyay S, Cooch N, Perales-Puchalt A, Stavroulaki K, Rochestie S, Peters J, Junker B, Campian JL, Chheda MG, Chicoine MR, Kim AH, Willie JT, Zipfel GJ, Dowling JL, Miller CA, Griffith OL, Griffith M, Gillanders WE, Miller, KE, Mardis ER, Sardesai NY, Dunn GP, Johanns TM.ย Nature Cancer
DOI:10.1038/s43018-026-01163-w
Abstract
Adjuvant personalized multivalent neoantigen DNA vaccination induces tumor-specific immune responses in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients
Glioblastoma is a fatal disease with a median prognosis of 12โ18โmonths. Recent studies have shown encouraging results using neoantigen-based vaccines to stimulate glioblastoma-directed immune responses, but overall immunogenicity has been low.
Here, we report the results of an open-label, single-arm, phase 1 clinical trial (GT-20) to evaluate the safety and feasibility (primary endpoints) as well as immunogenicity and preliminary clinical activity (secondary endpoints) of GNOS-PV01 monotherapy, a DNA-based personalized therapeutic cancer vaccine administered following surgical resection and radiation for patients with MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma.
The GT-20 study vaccinated nine patients, using up to 40 neoantigens per patient (range, 17โ40) without causing any serious adverse events, unexpected toxicities or dose-limiting toxicities.
The vaccine induced activation and expansion of circulating peripheral Tโcells in all evaluated patients, except one who was being treated with dexamethasone. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate 6โmonth progression-free survival and 12โmonth overall survival; each observed in 66.7% of patients.
Median progression-free survival was 8.5โmonths, median overall survival was 16.3โmonths and survival at 24โmonths was 33%, including one long-term survivor still alive 4โyears from the time of initial surgery.
This study met the pre-specified endpoints and supports the use of GNOS-PV01 as a potentially impactful component of glioblastoma immunotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov:ย NCT04015700.

