Who will get depressed under major stress? Study shows promise of genetic risk prediction

Summary: A polygenetic risk score for major depressive disorder may reveal those most at risk of developing depression during times of extreme stress.

Source: University of Michigan

Depression doesn’t come from one gene, one life event, or one personality trait. That’s what makes it so hard to predict, prevent or treat effectively.

But new research suggests the power of a tool that uses a range of genetic information to predict a person’s chance of developing depression when they’re under intense stress. The findings might help lead to a better understanding of the pathways that lead to depression.

While the tool is far from ready for common use on individuals, it does suggest the potential to personalize depression prevention, and identification of those who might be most vulnerable to stress or most resilient.

The study was done in a population of more than 5,200 people in the most stressful year of training for a medical career, called the intern year of residency. It’s described in a new paper in Nature Human Behaviour by a team from the University of Michigan.

A score based on many genetic factors

The team used a genetic risk-assessment tool called polygenic risk score. They constructed a polygenic risk score for major depressive disorder, or MDD-PRS, from widely available consortium and biobank data on the known associations between a person’s risk of depression, and variations throughout a person’s genome.

While genetics and stress are known to play a role in depression risk and onset, the new research helps reveal the way these factors interact.

The interns who had higher-than-average MDD-PRS scores were slightly more likely to be among the 3% of interns who showed signs of depression before their intern year started. But by the end of the year, these high PRS subjects were much more likely to be among the 33% of interns who had developed depression.

On the other hand, the group with the lowest MDD-PRS scores were far less likely to show signs of depression throughout their intern year, suggesting that the scoring system could be used to identify those most likely to be resilient despite intense stress.

Interns as a model of depression and stress

The research team tested the predictive power of MDD-PRS on young doctors taking part in the Intern Health Study, which is led by Srijan Sen, M.D., Ph.D., the senior author of the new paper. The Intern Health Study enrolls thousands of new physicians across the United States each year who agree to let the research team sample their DNA, and to answer surveys before they begin their intern year of medical training and several times during that intense year of long hours and high demands.

Sen and the study’s first author, U-M research specialist Yu Fang, combined data across millions of sites within the human genomes to construct the MDD-PRS, and looked to see how well a person’s “score” on this tool predicted with their scores on standard surveys of depressive symptoms. They also assessed whether the MDD-PRS worked through known mechanisms to depression, such personal and family history, childhood experience or general temperament.

The result: the MDD-PRS they developed accurately predicted the chance that certain interns would develop depression symptoms while under stress.

“Interestingly, we found evidence that the association between MDD-PRS and depression is stronger in the presence of stress and that the additional predictive power of MDD-PRS under stress is largely independent of known risk factors for depression.” says Sen, who holds the Eisenberg Professorship in Depression and Neurosciences at U-M and is part of the U-M Department of Psychiatry, the Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute and the Depression Center. “These findings further our understanding of how genomics and stress interact and suggest that further investigation of the genomics of stress response can uncover novel mechanisms that lead to depression.”

Notes of caution

The major limitation of the new study has to do with the source of the genetic information it’s based on. Because most research on the genetics of depression has been done in people of European ancestry, the MDD-PRS tool used in the study is specific to people of that background.

In fact, the tool failed to predict depression symptoms among groups of interns of south Asian or east Asian background who were also taking part in the Intern Health Study.

Also, the group of interns in the study was young, with an average age of 27, and had already graduated medical school and been accepted into a residency training program, making them not representative of the general population.

Despite these limitations, this test of the MDD-PRS suggests its potential use.

“We are optimistic that these findings will be transferred to other ethnic groups with improving multi-ethnic analysis techniques and more data collected from these populations,” says Fang. She also notes the predictive power of the MDD-PRS score to predict resilience is stronger than its ability to predict susceptibility. “We hope this will ease the worry that this tool might be misused to discriminate against at-risk individuals.”

More about the study

Sen, Fang and their colleagues used genetic linkages for depression identified through three major pools of DNA data: the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, the UK Biobank and the commercial genetics company 23andMe.

Sen’s previous work has shown the rise in depression symptoms over the course of the intern year, and the importance of the personality trait known as neuroticism as well as of an intern’s own history of stressful childhood events or traumas, and any past diagnosis of depression.

Under low-stress conditions before intern year started, most of the genomic risk captured by MDD-PRS worked through these three established risk factors.

This shows a head made up of cogwheels

While genetics and stress are known to play a role in depression risk and onset, the new research helps reveal the way these factors interact. The image is in the public domain.

However, while the overall predictive power of MDD-PRS increased significantly under the stress of intern year, the predictive power of the three established factors remained the same.

“This suggests that as-yet-undiscovered factors accounted for the greater link between MDD-PRS and depression under the high stress conditions, suggesting a possible pathway to learning more about those undiscovered factors,” says Sen.

“The ability of better predict who is most at risk for depression could allow us to better target our powerful interventions to prevent depression,” he concludes. “Studying individuals with a genomic protection against depression under stress can help us understand resilience”

In addition to Sen and Fang, the study’s authors include Laura Scott, Ph.D. and Peter Song, Ph.D. of the U-M School of Public Health, and Margit Burmeister, Ph.D., of the U-M Department of Human Genetics and MBNI.

Funding: The study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH101459)

About this neuroscience research article

Source:
University of Michigan
Media Contacts:
Kara Gavin – University of Michigan
Image Source:
The image is in the public domain.

Original Research: Closed access
“Genomic prediction of depression risk and resilience under stress”. Yu Fang, Laura Scott, Peter Song, Margit Burmeister & Srijan Sen.
Nature Human Behavior doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0759-3.

Abstract

Genomic prediction of depression risk and resilience under stress

Advancing ability to predict who is likely to develop depression holds great potential in reducing the disease burden. Here, we use the predictable and large increase in depression with physician training stress to identify predictors of depression. Applying the major depressive disorder polygenic risk score (MDD-PRS) derived from the most recent Psychiatric Genomics Consortium–UK Biobank–23andMe genome-wide association study to 5,227 training physicians, we found that MDD-PRS predicted depression under training stress (β = 0.095, P = 4.7 × 10−16) and that MDD-PRS was more strongly associated with depression under stress than at baseline (MDD-PRS × stress interaction β = 0.036, P = 0.005). Further, known risk factors accounted for substantially less of the association between MDD-PRS and depression when under stress than at baseline, suggesting that MDD-PRS adds unique predictive power in depression prediction. Finally, we found that low MDD-PRS may have particular use in identifying individuals with high resilience. Together, these findings suggest that MDD-PRS holds promise in furthering our ability to predict vulnerability and resilience under stress.

Feel free to share this Genetics and Psychology News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive the latest neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email daily from NeuroscienceNews.com
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. We do not sell email addresses. You can cancel your subscription any time.
No more articles