Refresh

This website neurosciencenews.com/baby-talk-language-learning-29245/ is currently offline. Cloudflare's Always Online™ shows a snapshot of this web page from the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. To check for the live version, click Refresh.

Baby Talk Enhances Infant Speech Learning

Summary: A new meta-analysis confirms that adults exaggerate vowel sounds when speaking to infants, a feature known as vowel hyperarticulation in infant-directed speech (IDS). By analyzing 55 studies across at least 10 languages, researchers found consistent evidence for this speech pattern, though its strength varied depending on language, method, and sample size.

The findings suggest vowel exaggeration may play a meaningful role in helping infants perceive and learn language. However, methodological inconsistencies and small sample sizes limit broader generalizations and call for more robust, cross-cultural research.

Key Facts:

  • Cross-Language Confirmation: Vowel hyperarticulation in IDS was found across at least 10 languages.
  • Meta-Analysis Scope: Combined results from 55 studies to strengthen statistical power.
  • Method Matters: Differences in measurement scales and sample sizes affected findings and generalizability.

Source: University of Tokyo

There are many factors that contribute to infant language development, not least of which is baby talk—the modified speech mothers and other adults often use when speaking to infants.

Baby talk is more formally referred to as infant-directed speech (IDS) and often differs from adult-directed speech (ADS) in both pitch and vocabulary. One component of IDS that remains controversial, however, is the exaggeration or hyperarticulation of vowel sounds.

This shows an adult talking to a baby.
Overall, the team observed that IDS vowel hyperarticulation studies have lower sample sizes than would be expected for well-powered statistical analysis and recommend that study size be increased. Credit: Neuroscience News

Some experts contend that vowel exaggeration produces clearer speech sounds that are easier for infants to process, but studies conflict on whether or not vowel hyperarticulation is actually present in IDS.

A group of scientists from International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN) at The University of Tokyo, the University of Amsterdam, PSL University and Aarhus University analyzed the existing research on vowel hyperarticulation in IDS to determine whether or not this specific type of speech exaggeration occurres in IDS.

The team published their research on 02-06-2025 in the journal Psychological Bulletin.

Before the meta-analysis, one group of studies suggested that adults particularly exaggerate the vowels “a”, “i” and “u” when speaking to infants, making vowels easier to perceive and potentially facilitating word learning.

In contrast, other studies had not detected the consistent exaggeration of vowels in IDS, suggesting that baby talk may instead be a by-product of smiling or some other positive effect.

“[W]e decided to conduct [a] meta-analysis on all studies done on this topic to understand if vowel exaggeration is a feature of speech directed to babies, and if so, which factors lead to it and to the observed differences in existing research,” said Irena Lovčević, postdoctoral researcher at the International Research Center for Neurointelligence  (WPI-IRCN) at The University of Tokyo and first author of the research paper.

The researchers performed meta-analyses on 20 IDS vowel hyperarticulation studies that used similar methodology and 35 studies that used any research method. Meta-analysis techniques combine the results of more than one similar research study to improve the statistical power of the results.

“Our meta-analysis confirms that mothers exaggerate vowels in speech directed to babies in at least 10 languages. However, our results also point to the diversity of methods used in the existing research.

“Hence, we want the readers, especially speech acquisition researchers, to carefully consider and document the methodological decisions in their research and avoid the generalization from one language to another or one method to another,” said Lovčević.

Overall, the team observed that IDS vowel hyperarticulation studies have lower sample sizes than would be expected for well-powered statistical analysis and recommend that study size be increased.

The researchers also noted that differences in hyperarticulation across languages were difficult to detect due to smaller sample sizes for less represented languages and that more cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research is needed to be able to generalize language acquisition research findings.

Additionally, the size of vowel hyperarticulation could also be influenced by the measurement scale (e.g., Hertz, Mel) used by the research team, illustrating how intimately methodology can influence experimental results and the ability to compare those results across studies.

After establishing the presence of vowel hyperarticulation in IDS, the research team has their sights set on learning more about other aspects of infant language development.

“The next step is further examination of different factors influencing language development in babies, with special focus on modifiable factors from babies’ immediate environment, such as the amount of speech that babies are exposed to and the qualities of vocal caregiver-baby interactions.

“How babies learn to speak without so much effort is still a big puzzle, so my goal is to contribute to solving … this puzzle,” said Lovčević.

Titia Benders from the University of Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sho Tsuji from the International Research Center for Neurointelligence  (WPI-IRCN) at The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Studies in Japan and the Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et de Psycholinguistique, Département d′Études Cognitives, ENS, EHESS, CNRS at PSL University in France; and Riccardo Fusaroli from Department of Linguistics in the Cognitive Science and Semiotics and the Interacting Minds Centre at Aarhus University in Denmark also contributed to this research.

Funding: This work was supported by a MEXT World Premier International Research Center Initiative startup grant, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20H05617 and 20H05919, and Seed funding from the Interacting Minds Center.

About this language and learning research news

Author: Kazuyo Okada
Source: University of Tokyo
Contact: Kazuyo Okada – University of Tokyo
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Closed access.
Acoustic Exaggeration of Vowels in Infant-Directed Speech: A Multi- Method Meta-Analytic Review” by Irena Lovčević et al. Psychological Bulletin


Abstract

Acoustic Exaggeration of Vowels in Infant-Directed Speech: A Multi- Method Meta-Analytic Review

There is a long-standing debate about the extent to which vowel hyperarticulation, the production of acoustically exaggerated vowels, occurs in infant-directed speech (IDS).

This exaggeration has been argued to result in clearer speech sounds that are easier for infants to process and might be positively related to infants’ linguistic outcomes.

However, previous findings regarding the presence of vowel hyperarticulation in IDS are seemingly inconsistent and contradictory, making it hard to advance our understanding of the role of hyperarticulation in language development and, consequently, the potential functions/roles of IDS in language acquisition.

Thus, we adopted a systematic review and meta-analytic approach to investigate the robustness of vowel hyperarticulation in IDS and identify sources of heterogeneity in the literature.

We employed four complementary meta-analytic approaches and evaluated the robustness of results across the different choices.

We performed both traditional (Frequentist) and Bayesian meta-analyses first on methodologically consistent studies (20 studies, 42 effect sizes) and then on all studies of vowel hyperarticulation in IDS irrespective of the method (35 studies, 80 effect sizes).

Findings indicate the presence of vowel hyperarticulation in IDS compared to adult-directed speech (effect sizes ranging from 0.41 to 0.69), as well as systematic and unsystematic variability due to, for example, cross-linguistic variability and methods employed, making it difficult to identify specific factors associated with stronger vowel hyperarticulation.

The quantitative results combined with a systematic review of the literature also enable important methodological insights, which we summarize into recommended practices such as enlarging sample sizes and explicitly incorporating sources of heterogeneity in analyses. 

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.