Summary: Researchers have developed a new method to record ‘analog memories’ in human cells, allowing them to retrieve information of past events, such as inflammation, via DNA sequencing.
Engineers program human cells to store complex histories in their DNA.
MIT biological engineers have devised a way to record complex histories in the DNA of human cells, allowing them to retrieve “memories” of past events, such as inflammation, by sequencing the DNA.
This analog memory storage system — the first that can record the duration and/or intensity of events in human cells — could also help scientists study how cells differentiate into various tissues during embryonic development, how cells experience environmental conditions, and how they undergo genetic changes that lead to disease.
“To enable a deeper understanding of biology, we engineered human cells that are able to report on their own history based on genetically encoded recorders,” says Timothy Lu, an associate professor of electrical engineering and computer science, and of biological engineering. This technology should offer insights into how gene regulation and other events within cells contribute to disease and development, he adds.
Lu, who is head of the Synthetic Biology Group at MIT’s Research Laboratory of Electronics, is the senior author of the new study, which appears in the Aug. 18 online edition of Science. The paper’s lead authors are Samuel Perli SM ’10, PhD ’15 and graduate student Cheryl Cui.
Many scientists, including Lu, have devised ways to record digital information in living cells. Using enzymes called recombinases, they program cells to flip sections of their DNA when a particular event occurs, such as exposure to a particular chemical. However, that method reveals only whether the event occurred, not how much exposure there was or how long it lasted.
Lu and other researchers have previously devised ways to record that kind of analog information in bacteria, but until now, no one has achieved it in human cells.
The new MIT approach is based on the genome-editing system known as CRISPR, which consists of a DNA-cutting enzyme called Cas9 and a short RNA strand that guides the enzyme to a specific area of the genome, directing Cas9 where to make its cut.
CRISPR is widely used for gene editing, but the MIT team decided to adapt it for memory storage. In bacteria, where CRISPR originally evolved, the system records past viral infections so that cells can recognize and fight off invading viruses.
“We wanted to adapt the CRISPR system to store information in the human genome,” Perli says.
When using CRISPR to edit genes, researchers create RNA guide strands that match a target sequence in the host organism’s genome. To encode memories, the MIT team took a different approach: They designed guide strands that recognize the DNA that encodes the very same guide strand, creating what they call “self-targeting guide RNA.”
Led by this self-targeting guide RNA strand, Cas9 cuts the DNA encoding the guide strand, generating a mutation that becomes a permanent record of the event. That DNA sequence, once mutated, generates a new guide RNA strand that directs Cas9 to the newly mutated DNA, allowing further mutations to accumulate as long as Cas9 is active or the self-targeting guide RNA is expressed.
By using sensors for specific biological events to regulate Cas9 or self-targeting guide RNA activity, this system enables progressive mutations that accumulate as a function of those biological inputs, thus providing genomically encoded memory.
For example, the researchers engineered a gene circuit that only expresses Cas9 in the presence of a target molecule, such as TNF-alpha, which is produced by immune cells during inflammation.
Whenever TNF- alpha is present, Cas9 cuts the DNA encoding the guide sequence, generating mutations. The longer the exposure to TNF-alpha or the greater the TNF-alpha concentration, the more mutations accumulate in the DNA sequence.
By sequencing the DNA later on, researchers can determine how much exposure there was.
“This is the rich analog behavior that we are looking for, where, as you increase the amount or duration of TNF-alpha, you get increases in the amount of mutations,” Perli says.
“Moreover, we wanted to test our system in living animals. Being able to record and extract information from live cells in mice can help answer meaningful biological questions,” Cui says. The researchers showed that the system is capable of recording inflammation in mice.
Most of the mutations result in deletion of part of the DNA sequence, so the researchers designed their RNA guide strands to be longer than the usual 20 nucleotides, so they won’t become too short to function. Sequences of 40 nucleotides are more than long enough to record for a month, and the researchers have also designed 70-nucleotide sequences that could be used to record biological signals for even longer. Tracking development and disease
The researchers also showed that they could engineer cells to detect and record more than one input, by producing multiple self-targeting RNA guide strands in the same cell. Each RNA guide is linked to a specific input and is only produced when that input is present. In this study, the researchers showed that they could record the presence of both the antibiotic doxycycline and a molecule known as IPTG.
Currently this method is most likely to be used for studies of human cells, tissues, or engineered organs, the researchers say. By programming cells to record multiple events, scientists could use this system to monitor inflammation or infection, or to monitor cancer progression. It could also be useful for tracing how cells specialize into different tissues during development of animals from embryos to adults.
“With this technology you could have different memory registers that are recording exposures to different signals, and you could see that each of those signals was received by the cell for this duration of time or at that intensity,” Perli says. “That way you could get closer to understanding what’s happening in development.”
About this neuroscience research article
Source: Anne Trafton – MIT Image Source: This NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to the researchers. Original Research:Abstract for “Continuous genetic recording with self-targeting CRISPR-Cas in human cells” by Samuel D. Perli, Cheryl H. Cui, and Timothy K. Lu in Science. Published online August 18 2016 doi:10.1126/science.aag0511
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]MIT. “Recording Analog Memories in Human Cells.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 17 August 2016. <https://neurosciencenews.com/analog-memory-human-cells-4873/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]MIT. (2016, August 17). Recording Analog Memories in Human Cells. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved August 17, 2016 from https://neurosciencenews.com/analog-memory-human-cells-4873/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]MIT. “Recording Analog Memories in Human Cells.” https://neurosciencenews.com/analog-memory-human-cells-4873/ (accessed August 17, 2016).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Continuous genetic recording with self-targeting CRISPR-Cas in human cells
The ability to record molecular events in vivo would enable monitoring of signaling dynamics within cellular niches and critical factors that orchestrate cellular behavior. We present a self-contained analog memory device for longitudinal recording of molecular stimuli into DNA mutations in human cells. This device consists of a self-targeting guide RNA (stgRNA) that repeatedly directs Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 nuclease activity toward the DNA that encodes the stgRNA, thereby enabling localized, continuous DNA mutagenesis as a function of stgRNA expression. We demonstrate programmable and multiplexed memory storage in human cells triggered by exogenous inducers or inflammation, both in vitro and in vivo. This tool, Mammalian Synthetic Cellular Recorder Integrating Biological Events (mSCRIBE), provides a unique strategy for investigating cell biology in vivo and enables continuous evolution of targeted DNA sequences.
“Continuous genetic recording with self-targeting CRISPR-Cas in human cells” by Samuel D. Perli, Cheryl H. Cui, and Timothy K. Lu in Science. Published online August 18 2016 doi:10.1126/science.aag0511