Summary: A new, non invasive spinal stimulation method has helped restore movement to hands of paralyzed patients, researchers report.
The ability to perform simple daily tasks can make a big difference in people’s lives, especially for those with spinal cord injuries. A UCLA-led team of scientists reports that six people with severe spinal cord injuries — three of them completely paralyzed — have regained use of their hands and fingers for the first time in years after undergoing a nonsurgical, noninvasive spinal stimulation procedure the researchers developed.
At the beginning of the study, three of the participants could not move their fingers at all, and none could turn a doorknob with one hand or twist a cap off a plastic water bottle. Each of them also had great difficulty using a cellphone. After only eight researcher-led training sessions with the spinal stimulation, all six individuals showed substantial improvements. The study participants had chronic and severe paralysis for more than one year, and some for more than 10 years.
From before the first session to the end of the last session, the participants improved their grip strength.
“About midway through the sessions, I could open my bedroom door with my left hand for the first time since my injury and could open new water bottles, when previously someone else had to do this for me,” said Cecilia Villarruel, one of the participants, whose injury resulted from a car accident 13 years earlier. “Most people with a spinal cord injury say they just want to go to the bathroom like a normal person again,” she said. “Small accomplishments like opening jars, bottles and doors enable a level of independence and self-reliance that is quite satisfying, and have a profound effect on people’s lives.”
In addition to regaining use of their fingers, the research subjects also gained other health benefits, including improved blood pressure, bladder function, cardiovascular function and the ability to sit upright without support.
“Within two or three sessions, everyone started showing significant improvements, and kept improving from there,” said the study’s lead author, UCLA research scientist Parag Gad.
“After just eight sessions, they could do things they haven’t been able to do for years,” said V. Reggie Edgerton, senior author of the research and a UCLA distinguished professor of integrative biology and physiology, neurobiology and neurosurgery.
This is the largest reported recovery of the use of hands that has been reported in patients with such severe spinal cord injuries, Edgerton said.
The researchers placed electrodes on the skin to stimulate the circuitry of the spinal cord. They call their method “transcutaneous enabling motor control,” or tEmc. In the stimulation, electrical current is applied at varying frequencies and intensities to specific locations on the spinal cord.
In the training sessions, the participants squeezed a small gripping device 36 times (18 times with each hand) and held their grip for three seconds; the researchers measured the amount of force they used. The training consisted of two sessions a week over four weeks; the eight sessions each lasted about 90 minutes.
“The combination of spinal stimulation plus training with the hands allows them to regain the lost function,” Gad said. They were less dependent on their caregivers, and could feed and dress themselves, he added.
Two of the six returned to Edgerton’s laboratory 60 days after the training ended and maintained their grip strength; they could turn a doorknob with one hand, twist off a bottle cap and use a fork with one hand. (The four others did not return to the laboratory. The research subjects live in New York, Minnesota and elsewhere.)
The research is published online this month in the Journal of Neurotrauma.
More than 1.2 million Americans are living with paralysis from spinal cord injuries, according to the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation. Hundreds of thousands of people in the United States have lost control of vital body functions due to such injuries, including use of their hands and fingers.
“Improved hand function can mean the difference between needing around-the-clock care and living more independently,” said Peter Wilderotter, president and CEO of the Reeve Foundation. “These findings bring great hope to those who were told recovery following paralysis would be impossible. As new discoveries and breakthroughs are uncovered, it is clear the word ‘impossible’ no longer applies to spinal cord injury.”
Edgerton’s research team has worked with more than two dozen people with severe spinal cord injuries, the vast majority of whom have shown substantial improvements.
“Nearly everyone thought the only people who would benefit from treatment were those who had been injured for less than a year; that was the dogma. Now we know the dogma is dead,” said Edgerton, who is also affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney’s Centre for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine in Australia. “All of our subjects have been paralyzed for more than a year. We know that in a high percentage of subjects who are severely injured, we can improve their quality of life.”
Edgerton is seeking FDA approval for the motor control device so that it can be used by rehabilitation clinics and others. He is able to accept only a small number of people into his research program.
The spinal stimulation approach is inexpensive, does not require surgery and can be used in poor communities and countries without advanced medical facilities — “and the effects are in some ways, we think, better than surgery,” Edgerton said.
“I get criticized a lot for giving ‘false hope’ but we follow where the science tells us to go and just give the research results,” Edgerton said. “Everything is telling us the nervous system is much more adaptable than we’ve given it credit for, and can relearn and recover from severe injury.”
About this neuroscience research article
Co-authors are Sujin Lee, a physician with the Veterans Affair Healthcare System Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders Center in Long Beach; Nicholas Terrafranca, CEO of NeuroRecovery Technologies, a medical technology company Edgerton co-founded that helps restore movement in patients with paralysis; Hui Zhong, a research scientist in Edgerton’s laboratory; Amanda Turner, Edgerton’s former administrative assistant, who helped to recruit and select the research subjects; and Yury Gerasimenko, director of the laboratory of movement physiology at Russia’s Pavlov Institute and a researcher in the UCLA department of integrative biology and physiology.
Funding: The research was funded by the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation; the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; the Dana and Albert R. Broccoli Foundation; and the Walkabout Foundation.
Source: Stuart Wolpert – UCLA Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com. Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the Edgerton Lab, University of California Los Angeles video. Video Source: Video credited to Edgerton Lab, University of California Los Angeles. Original Research:Abstract for “Noninvasive activation of cervical spinal networks after severe paralysis” by Dr. Parag Gad, Dr. Sujin Lee, Dr. Nicholas Terrafranca, Dr. Hui Zhong, Mrs. Amanda Turner, Dr. Yury Gerasimenko, and Dr. Victor Reggie Edgerton Ph.D. in Journal of Neurotrauma. Published April 13 2018. doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5461
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]UCLA “Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation Enables Paralyzed People to Regain Use of Hands.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 26 April 2018. <https://neurosciencenews.com/spinal-stimulation-hand-paralysis-8886/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]UCLA (2018, April 26). Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation Enables Paralyzed People to Regain Use of Hands. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://neurosciencenews.com/spinal-stimulation-hand-paralysis-8886/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]UCLA “Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation Enables Paralyzed People to Regain Use of Hands.” https://neurosciencenews.com/spinal-stimulation-hand-paralysis-8886/ (accessed April 26, 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Noninvasive activation of cervical spinal networks after severe paralysis
Paralysis of the upper extremities following cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) significantly impairs one’s ability to live independently. While regaining hand function or grasping ability is considered one of the most desired functions in tetraplegics, limited therapeutic development in this direction has been demonstrated to date in humans with a high, severe cervical injury. The underlying hypothesis is after severe cervical SCI, nonfunctional sensory-motor networks within the cervical spinal cord can be transcutaneously neuromodulated to physiological states which enables and amplifies voluntary control of the hand. Improved voluntary hand function occurred within a single session in every subject tested. After 8 sessions of noninvasive transcutaneous stimulation, combined with training over 4 weeks maximum voluntary hand grip forces increased by ~325% (in the presence of stimulation) and ~225% (when grip strength was tested without simultaneous stimulation) in chronic cervical SCI subjects (AIS B, n = 3. AIS C, n = 5; 1-21 years post injury). Maximum grip strength improved in both the left and right hands and the magnitude of increase was independent of hand dominance. We refer to the neuromodulatory method used as transcutaneous enabling motor control (tEmc) to emphasize that the stimulation parameters used are designed to avoid directly inducing muscular contractions, but to enable task performance according to the subject’s voluntary intent. In some subjects there were improvements in autonomic function, lower extremity motor function and sensation below the level of the lesion. Although a neuromodulation-training effect was observed in every subject tested, further controlled and blinded studies are needed to determine the responsiveness of a larger and broader population of subjects varying in the type, severity and years post injury. It appears rather convincing, however, that a “central pattern generation” phenomenon as generally perceived in the lumbosacral networks in controlling stepping neuromodulator is not a critical element of spinal neuromodulation to regain function among spinal networks.