Neuroscience research articles are provided.
What is neuroscience? Neuroscience is the scientific study of nervous systems. Neuroscience can involve research from many branches of science including those involving neurology, brain science, neurobiology, psychology, computer science, artificial intelligence, statistics, prosthetics, neuroimaging, engineering, medicine, physics, mathematics, pharmacology, electrophysiology, biology, robotics and technology.
– These articles focus mainly on neurology research. – What is neurology? – Definition of neurology: a science involved in the study of the nervous systems, especially of the diseases and disorders affecting them. – Neurology research can include information involving brain research, neurological disorders, medicine, brain cancer, peripheral nervous systems, central nervous systems, nerve damage, brain tumors, seizures, neurosurgery, electrophysiology, BMI, brain injuries, paralysis and spinal cord treatments.
What is Psychology? Definition of Psychology: Psychology is the study of behavior in an individual, or group. Psychology news articles are listed below.
Artificial Intelligence articles involve programming, neural engineering, artificial neural networks, artificial life, a-life, floyds, boids, emergence, machine learning, neuralbots, neuralrobotics, computational neuroscience and more involving A.I. research.
Robotics articles will cover robotics research press releases. Robotics news from universities, labs, researchers, engineers, students, high schools, conventions, competitions and more are posted and welcome.
Genetics articles related to neuroscience research will be listed here.
Neurotechnology research articles deal with robotics, AI, deep learning, machine learning, Brain Computer Interfaces, neuroprosthetics, neural implants and more. Read the latest neurotech news articles below.
Summary: Researchers report the striatum and amygdala are less able to track changes in threat levels in those with severe PTSD. The findings may serve as a biomarker to evaluate who may be at greater risk of PTSD symptoms.
Using sophisticated computational tools, researchers at Yale University and the Icahn School of Medicine have discovered biomarkers that may explain why symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be so severe for some people and not for others.
The findings are reported Jan. 21 in the journal Nature Neuroscience.
The study of combat veterans who have been exposed to intense events shows that those with severe symptoms of PTSD have distinct patterns of neurological and physiological responses affecting associative learning — the ability to distinguish between harmful and safe stimuli in the environment.
“We are shedding new light on how people learn fear and unlearn it,” said Ilan Harpaz-Rotem, associate professor of psychiatry at Yale and co-corresponding author of the paper.
Some people who experience trauma exhibit few or limited side effects after the event. The research team wanted to explore why others suffer greatly.
Veterans who had experienced intense events during combat deployment underwent fMRI and were tested for physiological responses while presented with pictures of two different faces. In classic fear-conditioning tests, the subjects were administered slight electric shocks after viewing one of the faces, but not the other. Later, the faces that accompanied the shock were switched in an attempt have subjects “unlearn” original fear conditioning and test their ability to learn that something new in the environment is dangerous.
Using computational modeling, researchers found that two areas of the brain — the amygdala and striatum — were less able to track changes in threat level in those with severe PTSD symptoms.
“There were pronounced differences in the ‘learning rates’ of those with severe symptoms and those without symptoms,” Harpaz-Rotem said.
Highly symptomatic individuals tended to overreact to a mismatch between their expectations and what they actually experienced, he said. A garbage can in a war zone might contain an explosive device, he explained, but those with severe PTSD symptoms have a more difficult time unlearning the fear in civilian life than those with less severe symptoms.
“The findings of this study provide new and innovative understandings of the neurobiology of PTSD and a better understanding of learning processes in this population that might be useful in the future to refine treatment for the disorder,” said Yale’s Ifat Levy, associate professor of comparative medicine and neuroscience and co-author of the study.
[divider]About this neuroscience research article[/divider]
Funding: Daniela Schiller of the Icahn School of Medicine was co-corresponding author of the study, which was primarily funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Center for PTSD.
Source: Bill Hathaway – Yale Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com. Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the Yale news release. Original Research: Abstract for “Neural computations of threat in the aftermath of combat trauma” by Philipp Homan, Ifat Levy, Eric Feltham, Charles Gordon, Jingchu Hu, Jian Li, Robert H. Pietrzak, Steven Southwick, John H. Krystal, Ilan Harpaz-Rotem & Daniela Schiller in Nature Neuroscience. Published January 21 2019. doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0315-x
[divider]Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article[/divider]
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]Yale”Brain Biomarkers Identify Those at Risk of Severe PTSD Symptoms.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 22 January 2019. <https://neurosciencenews.com/ptsd-biomarkers-10614/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]Yale(2019, January 22). Brain Biomarkers Identify Those at Risk of Severe PTSD Symptoms. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved January 22, 2019 from https://neurosciencenews.com/ptsd-biomarkers-10614/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]Yale”Brain Biomarkers Identify Those at Risk of Severe PTSD Symptoms.” https://neurosciencenews.com/ptsd-biomarkers-10614/ (accessed January 22, 2019).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Neural computations of threat in the aftermath of combat trauma
By combining computational, morphological, and functional analyses, this study relates latent markers of associative threat learning to overt post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in combat veterans. Using reversal learning, we found that symptomatic veterans showed greater physiological adjustment to cues that did not predict what they had expected, indicating greater sensitivity to prediction errors for negative outcomes. This exaggerated weighting of prediction errors shapes the dynamic learning rate (associability) and value of threat predictive cues. The degree to which the striatum tracked the associability partially mediated the positive correlation between prediction-error weights and PTSD symptoms, suggesting that both increased prediction-error weights and decreased striatal tracking of associability independently contribute to PTSD symptoms. Furthermore, decreased neural tracking of value in the amygdala, in addition to smaller amygdala volume, independently corresponded to higher PTSD symptom severity. These results provide evidence for distinct neurocomputational contributions to PTSD symptoms.
[divider]Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.[/divider]