Summary: Researchers investigate bias against childless couples and discover people not only see them as atypical, but also ‘morally wrong’.
Source: Indiana University.
Data representing individuals from across the United States indicates that U.S. adults are increasingly delaying the decision to have children or forgoing parenthood entirely. Yet evidence suggests that voluntarily child-free people are stigmatized for this decision, according to a study published in the March 2017 edition of Sex Roles: A Journal of Research.
Leslie Ashburn-Nardo, an associate professor of psychology at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, recently investigated this bias against those who choose to not have children.
“What’s remarkable about our findings is the moral outrage participants reported feeling toward a stranger who decided to not have children,” Ashburn-Nardo said. “Our data suggests that not having children is seen not only as atypical, or surprising, but also as morally wrong.”
The findings are consistent with other studies of backlash against people who violate social roles and other stereotypic expectations. When people violate their expected roles, they suffer social sanctions. Given that more and more people in the U.S. are choosing to not have children, this work has far-reaching implications.
Ashburn-Nardo believes these findings offer the first known empirical evidence that parenthood is seen as a moral imperative.
“Having children is obviously a more typical decision, so perhaps people are rightfully surprised when they meet a married adult who, with their partner, has chosen to not have children. That they are also outraged by child-free people is what’s novel about this work.”
Participants read a vignette about a married adult person and then rated their perceptions of the person’s degree of psychological fulfillment and their feelings toward the person. The vignette varied only in terms of the portrayed person’s gender and whether they had chosen to have children.
“Consistent with many personal anecdotes, participants rated voluntarily child-free men and women as significantly less fulfilled than men and women with children,” Ashburn-Nardo said. “This effect was driven by feelings of moral outrage — anger, disapproval and disgust — toward the voluntarily child-free people.”
“Other research has linked moral outrage to discrimination and interpersonal mistreatment,” Ashburn-Nardo said. “It’s possible that, to the extent they evoke moral outrage, voluntarily child-free people suffer similar consequences, such as in the workplace or in health care. Exploring such outcomes for this demographic is the next step in my research.”
About this psychology research article
Source: Rich Schneider – Indiana University Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain. Original Research:Abstract for “Parenthood as a Moral Imperative? Moral Outrage and the Stigmatization of Voluntarily Childfree Women and Men” by Leslie Ashburn-Nardo in Sex Roles. Published online March 1 2017 doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0606-1
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]Indiana University “People Feel Moral Outrage Toward Those Who Decide Not to Have Kids.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 1 March 2017. <https://neurosciencenews.com/psychology-outrage-childlessness-6182/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]Indiana University (2017, March 1). People Feel Moral Outrage Toward Those Who Decide Not to Have Kids. NeuroscienceNew. Retrieved March 1, 2017 from https://neurosciencenews.com/psychology-outrage-childlessness-6182/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]Indiana University “People Feel Moral Outrage Toward Those Who Decide Not to Have Kids.” https://neurosciencenews.com/psychology-outrage-childlessness-6182/ (accessed March 1, 2017).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Parenthood as a Moral Imperative? Moral Outrage and the Stigmatization of Voluntarily Childfree Women and Men
Nationally representative data indicate that adults in the United States are increasingly delaying the decision to have children or are forgoing parenthood entirely. Although some empirical research has examined the social consequences of adults’ decision to be childfree, few studies have identified explanatory mechanisms for the stigma this population experiences. Based on the logic of backlash theory and research on retributive justice, the present research examined moral outrage as a mechanism through which voluntarily childfree targets are perceived less favorably than are targets with children for violating the prescribed social role of parenthood. In a between-subjects experiment, 197 undergraduates (147 women, 49 men, 1 participant with missing gender data) from a large U.S. Midwestern urban university were randomly assigned to evaluate a male or female married target who had chosen to have zero or two children. Participants completed measures of the target’s perceived psychological fulfillment and their affective reactions to the target. Consistent with earlier studies, voluntarily childfree targets were perceived as significantly less psychologically fulfilled than targets with two children. Extending past research, voluntarily childfree targets elicited significantly greater moral outrage than did targets with two children. My findings were not qualified by targets’ gender. Moral outrage mediated the effect of target parenthood status on perceived fulfillment. Collectively, these findings offer the first known empirical evidence of perceptions of parenthood as a moral imperative.
“Parenthood as a Moral Imperative? Moral Outrage and the Stigmatization of Voluntarily Childfree Women and Men” by Leslie Ashburn-Nardo in Sex Roles. Published online March 1 2017 doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0606-1