Neuroscience research articles are provided.
What is neuroscience? Neuroscience is the scientific study of nervous systems. Neuroscience can involve research from many branches of science including those involving neurology, brain science, neurobiology, psychology, computer science, artificial intelligence, statistics, prosthetics, neuroimaging, engineering, medicine, physics, mathematics, pharmacology, electrophysiology, biology, robotics and technology.
– These articles focus mainly on neurology research. – What is neurology? – Definition of neurology: a science involved in the study of the nervous systems, especially of the diseases and disorders affecting them. – Neurology research can include information involving brain research, neurological disorders, medicine, brain cancer, peripheral nervous systems, central nervous systems, nerve damage, brain tumors, seizures, neurosurgery, electrophysiology, BMI, brain injuries, paralysis and spinal cord treatments.
What is Psychology? Definition of Psychology: Psychology is the study of behavior in an individual, or group. Psychology news articles are listed below.
Artificial Intelligence articles involve programming, neural engineering, artificial neural networks, artificial life, a-life, floyds, boids, emergence, machine learning, neuralbots, neuralrobotics, computational neuroscience and more involving A.I. research.
Robotics articles will cover robotics research press releases. Robotics news from universities, labs, researchers, engineers, students, high schools, conventions, competitions and more are posted and welcome.
Genetics articles related to neuroscience research will be listed here.
Neurotechnology research articles deal with robotics, AI, deep learning, machine learning, Brain Computer Interfaces, neuroprosthetics, neural implants and more. Read the latest neurotech news articles below.
Summary: A new study examines how the hormone oxytocin helps to mediate social interactions.
Source: Chinese Academy of Science.
“Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour and it seems like a minute.” As Einstein once joked, our subjective time deviates, sometimes significantly, from physical time.
This is because the brain has no direct access to physical time and infers time from the neural representation of external events.
Subjective time is believed to be “warped” by the neural energy involved in representing sensory inputs. Its deviation from physical time has mostly been attributed to the sensory properties (e.g., size, luminance, speed, etc.) of external stimuli. But what role, if any, do we the experiencers play in our experience of time?
Psychologists ZHOU Wen, JIANG Yi and their colleagues at the Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, probed this issue by examining individuals’ temporal perception of social interactions and the variation among individuals, noting the gregarious nature of humans, the ubiquity of social interactions in daily life and the pronounced interindividual differences in social proficiency — a stable personality trait.
As part of this study, participants viewed two sequentially presented point-light motion sequences — one portraying two agents engaging in a face-to-face communicative interaction, the other noncommunicative — in random order.
One of the two motion sequences was presented for 1000 ms, the other for 400-1,600 ms. Participants were then asked to press one of two buttons to indicate which motion sequence was longer in duration.
Their duration judgments revealed a temporal compression effect: Motion sequences showing agents acting communicatively were perceived to be significantly shorter in duration in comparison with those acting noncommunicatively.
The effect disappeared when the motion sequences were shown upside down, when a temporal lag was inserted in between the original upright acting agents, and when the two upright agents in each display were spatially swapped such that they faced in opposite directions.
In other words, the temporal compression effect was not due to the spatial-temporal correlation between the moves of the two agents. Could it be a manifestation of the observer’s social proficiency?
The researchers assessed participants’ social proficiency with the Autism Spectrum Quotient and found this to be the case: socially less proficient individuals were less susceptible to the effect than socially proficient ones. Social proficiency has been linked to one’s endogenous oxytocin level.
The researchers further showed that intranasal oxytocin administration promoted the temporal compression effect in socially less proficient individuals.
By contrast, in socially proficient individuals with overall higher levels of endogenous oxytocin, the very effect was diminished following the application of an oxytocin antagonist called atosiban (Experiment 6).
These findings highlight the idiosyncrasy of subjective time and represent an initial effort to trace it back to personality factors and their neuroendocrine origins.
In the meantime, they open up an avenue for probing and manipulating automatic processing of complex social interplays at the individual level, and may lead to benefits for individuals with social deficits, e.g., those with autism spectrum disorder.
[divider]About this neuroscience research article[/divider]
Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the Strategic Priority Research Program and Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Source: ZHOU Wen – Chinese Academy of Science Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com. Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to ZHOU Wen. Original Research: Open access research for “Perception of social interaction compresses subjective duration in an oxytocin-dependent manner” by Rui Liu, Xiangyong Yuan, Kepu Chen, Yi Jiang Is a corresponding author , Wen Zhou Is a corresponding author in eLife. Published May 22 2018. doi:10.7554/eLife.32100
[divider]Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article[/divider]
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]Chinese Academy of Science “Oxytocin Mediates Subjective Duration of Social Interactions.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 25 May 2018. <https://neurosciencenews.com/oxytocin-social-interaction-9145/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]Chinese Academy of Science (2018, May 25). Oxytocin Mediates Subjective Duration of Social Interactions. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved May 25, 2018 from https://neurosciencenews.com/oxytocin-social-interaction-9145/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]Chinese Academy of Science “Oxytocin Mediates Subjective Duration of Social Interactions.” https://neurosciencenews.com/oxytocin-social-interaction-9145/ (accessed May 25, 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Perception of social interaction compresses subjective duration in an oxytocin-dependent manner
Communication through body gestures permeates our daily life. Efficient perception of the message therein reflects one’s social cognitive competency. Here we report that such competency is manifested temporally as shortened subjective duration of social interactions: motion sequences showing agents acting communicatively are perceived to be significantly shorter in duration as compared with those acting noncommunicatively. The strength of this effect is negatively correlated with one’s autistic-like tendency. Critically, intranasal oxytocin administration restores the temporal compression effect in socially less proficient individuals, whereas the administration of atosiban, a competitive antagonist of oxytocin, diminishes the effect in socially proficient individuals. These findings indicate that perceived time, rather than being a faithful representation of physical time, is highly idiosyncratic and ingrained with one’s personality trait. Moreover, they suggest that oxytocin is involved in mediating time perception of social interaction, further supporting the role of oxytocin in human social cognition.
[divider]Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.[/divider]