How People Manipulate Their Own Memories

Summary: People influence the construction of past events on three processing levels, and that occurs unconsciously and automatically.

Source: RUB

People remember past experiences through the so-called episodic memory system. In the process, they can manipulate their memories on three levels, describe Dr. Roy Dings and Professor Albert Newen from the Institute of Philosophy II at Ruhr-Universität Bochum in a theoretical paper.

The study has been published online in the journal Review of Philosophy and Psychology.

The researchers explain how people recall past experiences and modify them in the process. “We often construct memories of important events in a way that suits us,” outlines Albert Newen.

Memories are not photographic representations

Adults mainly remember significant experiences that were linked to very positive or very negative feelings, such as a unique experience on holidays, a driving test, or a wedding. The memory is not a photographic excerpt of the past, but a construct that is fed by the perception of a past event; however, when the perceived situation is stored and, above all, recalled, a variety of construction processes take place. “To paraphrase Pippi Longstocking, you might say: I make the past world the way I like it,” as Roy Dings illustrates.

People can influence the construction of a past scenario on three processing levels – something that usually happens automatically and unconsciously. The source of influence is the narrative self-image: “When we talk to friends, we tell about ourselves the things that are important to us,” says Roy Dings. “We refer to these aspects as the narrative self-image.”

The constructive model of memory recall

The authors, as well as all members of the Bochum-based research group “Constructing Scenarios of the Past”, work on the assumption that a memory is formed when a memory trace is activated by a stimulus: the wedding invitation card on the pinboard, for example, activates a memory trace of the wedding table.

However, according to the Bochum model of episodic memory, the situation is then augmented by general background knowledge that is available in semantic memory. When the memory trace and background knowledge merge, a vivid memory picture emerges, for example of the bride’s greeting, and, eventually, the person talks about the event the way they experienced it.

Three levels of influence

The process of scenario construction includes the stimulus that triggers the memory, the actual processing, and the result, i.e. the memory image and the associated description. People can be influenced by all three components.

Firstly, they tend to specifically look for the triggering stimulus for positive memories and avoid it for negative memories. For example, they put a wedding photo on the office desk, but avoid encounters with people with whom unpleasant memories are associated.

Secondly, the self-image can also influence what background information is drawn upon to augment the sparse memory trace into a vivid memory; this is what determines the rich memory image in the first place.

This shows some photographs, an alarm clock and white roses
Adults mainly remember significant experiences that were linked to very positive or very negative feelings, such as a unique experience on holidays, a driving test or a wedding. Image is in the public domain

Thirdly, the description associated with a memory image can be either very concrete or rather abstract. The memory image can be described in concrete terms either as the beginning of the bride’s address or in more abstract terms as the beginning of the growing together of two families.

The more abstract the associated description, the more likely a person is to remember the experience from an observer’s perspective, i.e. as an object in the scene; in this case, the feelings associated with the experience are less intense. The level of description chosen by the self-image influences the memory image and how it is experienced – and in particular, in what form it is then recorded.

“Essentially, this means we shape our memories in such a way that we protect our positive self and tend to mitigate the challenges posed by negative memories that do not fit our self-image,” concludes Albert Newen.

About this memory research news

Author: Julia Weiler
Source: RUB
Contact: Julia Weiler – RUB
Image: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Open access.
Constructing the Past: the Relevance of the Narrative Self in Modulating Episodic Memory” by Albert Newen. et al. Review of Philosophy and Psychology


Abstract

Constructing the Past: the Relevance of the Narrative Self in Modulating Episodic Memory

Episodic memories can no longer be seen as the re-activation of stored experiences but are the product of an intense construction process based on a memory trace.

Episodic recall is a result of a process of scenario construction. If one accepts this generative framework of episodic memory, there is still a be big gap in understanding the role of the narrative self in shaping scenario construction.

Some philosophers are in principle sceptic by claiming that a narrative self cannot be more than a causally inefficacious attributed entity anyway.

Thus, we first characterize a narrative self in detail and second we clarify its influential causal role in shaping our episodic memories by influencing the process of scenario construction.

This happens at three stages, namely at the level of the input, the output and the process of scenario construction.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. From experience I believe that people reconstruct and edit their past to form a meaningful story of their lives. Nobody wants to think that their life has been meaningless. We also derive pleasure and comfort from retelling our story over and over again and we have to be patient with our friends to allow them to relate their story to us.

  2. Play only big disagreement is on the term: memory Trace.

    Where is it it’s going to be more like a memory scan in most cases.

    Yes in some will be using a sort of trade system which is specific and pinpoint accurate.

    But in the vast majority of instances that we go into our memories it’s in a scan fashion. Then once we find the general memory the chunk as it’s referred to in neurology and psychology. There will be another scan to be able to identify which memory to trace.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *