Neuroscience research articles are provided.
What is neuroscience? Neuroscience is the scientific study of nervous systems. Neuroscience can involve research from many branches of science including those involving neurology, brain science, neurobiology, psychology, computer science, artificial intelligence, statistics, prosthetics, neuroimaging, engineering, medicine, physics, mathematics, pharmacology, electrophysiology, biology, robotics and technology.
– These articles focus mainly on neurology research. – What is neurology? – Definition of neurology: a science involved in the study of the nervous systems, especially of the diseases and disorders affecting them. – Neurology research can include information involving brain research, neurological disorders, medicine, brain cancer, peripheral nervous systems, central nervous systems, nerve damage, brain tumors, seizures, neurosurgery, electrophysiology, BMI, brain injuries, paralysis and spinal cord treatments.
What is Psychology? Definition of Psychology: Psychology is the study of behavior in an individual, or group. Psychology news articles are listed below.
Artificial Intelligence articles involve programming, neural engineering, artificial neural networks, artificial life, a-life, floyds, boids, emergence, machine learning, neuralbots, neuralrobotics, computational neuroscience and more involving A.I. research.
Robotics articles will cover robotics research press releases. Robotics news from universities, labs, researchers, engineers, students, high schools, conventions, competitions and more are posted and welcome.
Genetics articles related to neuroscience research will be listed here.
Neurotechnology research articles deal with robotics, AI, deep learning, machine learning, Brain Computer Interfaces, neuroprosthetics, neural implants and more. Read the latest neurotech news articles below.
Summary: A new study adds to growing evidence that infants possess a basic theory of mind. Neuroimaging reveals the temporal parietal junction, an area of the brain associated with theory of mind, responds similarly in infants and adults when watching videos of actors expressing different mental states.
Source: University of Illinois.
A brain-imaging study offers new support for the idea that infants can accurately track other people’s beliefs. When 7-month-old infants in the study viewed videos of an actor who saw – or failed to see – an object being moved to a new location, activity in a brain region known to play a role in processing others’ beliefs changed in the infants just as it did in adults watching the same videos.
“This suggests that the infant brain, like that of adults, may distinguish when others hold true and false beliefs,” said University of Illinois psychology professor Daniel Hyde, who led the new research. (Watch a video about the research.)
The findings, reported in The Journal of Neuroscience, add to the evidence that infants possess at least a basic “theory of mind,” Hyde said.
“Theory of mind would be your ability to think about other people’s mental states: the thoughts, beliefs or anything else that goes on in the head of another person,” he said. “It seems remarkable that an infant could have even a basic understanding of other people’s mental states. But when you consider all the things infants have to learn and how they learn, it makes sense that they would have at least some ability to imagine why people are doing what they are doing.”
Infants cannot explain their perceptions of external events, and some psychologists think that very young children cannot grasp other people’s mental states until they are 2 to 4 years of age – old enough to verbalize what the children think is going on, Hyde said.
However, previous studies that tracked where infants look and how long they look at people engaged in hide-and-seek activities have found that infants tend to notice when someone holds a false belief – for example, when the person fails to see a puppet move a toy from one box to another, Hyde said. In such cases, infants appear to be surprised – as indicated by increased looking – when a person fails to see the toy moved to a new location but looks for it in the new location anyway.
In a previous study, Hyde and his colleagues looked at activity in the temporal-parietal junction, a brain region thought to play a role in theory of mind in adults. They recorded activity in the TPJ as adults viewed a video of an actor watching – or not watching – a puppet move a toy from one location to another.
In the new study, they used the same brain-imaging methodology in infants who watched the same videos the adults had seen.
“We wanted to see whether there was a parallel between activity in the TPJ in infancy and what occurs in adults during these scenarios that some people claim engage theory of mind,” Hyde said. “The logic is that if this region responds in a similar way in infants, you can draw a more direct comparison to what adults and older children are doing.”
The researchers used an emerging technology called near-infrared spectroscopy to capture brain activity in the TPJ. This noninvasive technique measures how light scatters on the surface of the brain. Light scatters differently when a brain region is more active – a response to changes in the oxygenation state of blood in that part of the brain.
Near-infrared spectroscopy offers a way to compare activity changes in adult and infant brains, Hyde said.
“This method is nice because with the infants, you put a cap on their head, they can sit on their parent’s lap and watch whatever you present to them. They probably feel more comfortable and it’s more natural than other methods,” he said.
The team found that the TPJ in infants responds very similarly to that of adults when viewing the different video scenarios, Hyde said.
“The infants, like the adults, had an uptick in activity in the TPJ when watching a scenario where the actor failed to observe where the puppet put the toy and, therefore, held a false belief about the location of the toy,” he said.
Hyde said the new findings do not suggest that infants have a fully developed theory of mind in the first year of life.
“This simply provides a foundation for developing a deeper understanding of other people’s thoughts and beliefs,” he said.
[divider]About this neuroscience research article[/divider]
Source: Diana Yates – University of Illinois Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com. Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to Kaitlin Southworth. Original Research: Abstract for “Functional Organization of the Temporal–Parietal Junction for Theory of Mind in Preverbal Infants: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study” by Daniel C. Hyde, Charline E. Simon, Fransisca Ting and Julia I. Nikolaeva in Journal of Neuroscience. Published May 2 2018. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0264-17.2018
[divider]Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article[/divider]
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]University of Illinois “Study Adds New Evidence that Infants Track Others’ Mental States.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 7 May 2018. <https://neurosciencenews.com/infant-mental-state-tracking-8978/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]University of Illinois (2018, May 7). Study Adds New Evidence that Infants Track Others’ Mental States. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved May 7, 2018 from https://neurosciencenews.com/infant-mental-state-tracking-8978/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]University of Illinois “Study Adds New Evidence that Infants Track Others’ Mental States.” https://neurosciencenews.com/infant-mental-state-tracking-8978/ (accessed May 7, 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Functional Organization of the Temporal–Parietal Junction for Theory of Mind in Preverbal Infants: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study
Successful human social life requires imagining what others believe or think to understand and predict behavior. This ability, often referred to as theory of mind (ToM), reliably engages a specialized network of temporal and prefrontal brain regions in older children and adults, including selective recruitment of the temporal–parietal junction (TPJ). To date, how and when this specialized brain organization for ToM arises is unknown due to limitations in functional neuroimaging at younger ages. Here, we used the emerging technique of functional near-infrared spectroscopy to measure the functional brain response across parietal, temporal, and prefrontal regions in 7-month-old male and female infants as they viewed different video scenarios of a person searching for a hidden object. Over different conditions, we manipulated whether the person held an accurate (true) or inaccurate (false) belief about the location of the hidden object in the videos. In two separate experiments, we observed that activity from the TPJ, but not other temporal and prefrontal regions, spontaneously tracked with the beliefs of the other person, responding more during scenarios when the other person’s belief regarding the location of the object was false compared with scenarios when her belief was true. These results mirror those obtained with adults to show that the TPJ already shows some functional organization relevant to high-level social cognition by around 7 months of age. Furthermore, these results suggest that infants may draw on similar core mechanisms to implicitly track beliefs, as adults do when reasoning explicitly about them.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans selectively engage a network of brain regions, including the temporal–parietal junction (TPJ), to track what others think, an ability referred to as theory of mind. How and when this specialized brain organization for high-level social cognition arises is unknown. Using the emerging technique of near-infrared spectroscopy with 7-month-old infants, we observed that activity of the TPJ, but not other temporal and frontal regions, distinguished between scenarios when another person’s belief about the location of the object was false compared with scenarios when the belief was true. These results suggest that a basic neural architecture to understand and predict the actions of others based on their beliefs may be present from the first year of life.
[divider]Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.[/divider]