Targeting the Social Networks of Group Violence

Summary: Researchers report a strong group of freinds could be just as big a factor in acts of group violence as a charismatic leader.

Source: Yale.

A strong network of friends may be just as big a factor in acts of group violence as having a charismatic leader or a savvy battle plan, according to a new study.

Researchers studied the social dynamics of the Nyangatom, a nomadic tribal group in East Africa that is regularly involved in violent raids with other groups. The researchers mapped the interpersonal connections among Nyangatom men over a three-year period, focusing on how those friendship networks affected the initiation of raids and participation in those raids.

The findings, which appear the week of Oct. 10 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, may also apply to potentially violent activities associated with terrorism, revolutions, and gangs.

“Social interactions in networks are crucial for the emergence of positive phenomena, like cooperation and innovation, but they also play a role in other sorts of collective behavior, like the seemingly spontaneous emergence of violence,” said Nicholas Christakis, co-director of the Yale Institute for Network Science (YINS) and senior author of the study. Christakis is a professor of sociology, ecology & evolutionary biology, biomedical engineering, and medicine at Yale.

“People go to war with their friends, and the social network properties of such violent activities have rarely been explored,” Christakis added.

The study found that the initiation of Nyangatom raids depended on the presence of leaders who had participated in many raids, had more friends, and held central positions in the social network. However, membership in raiding parties depended on a population much larger than the leaders’ network of friends. Non-leaders, in fact, had a bigger impact on raid participation than leaders, by virtue of their own friendships.

“Collective action doesn’t get off the ground with just a charismatic leader attracting random followers,” said Alexander Isakov, co-first author of the study and a postdoc at the Human Nature Lab at YINS. “People are driven to participate in the group predominantly due to friendship ties.”

A surprising aspect of the findings, according to the researchers, was the interplay between leadership and friendship in an environment without any formal hierarchy. The Nyangatom raiding groups are informal groups of peers, yet individuals played distinct roles that mirrored a formal leadership structure.

Image shows guns.
Two rifles belonging to Nyangatom men hang on a brush fence. NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to Luke Glowacki.

“They have no formal political leaders or chiefs,” said co-first author Luke Glowacki, a research fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, France. “The lack of political centralization creates an opportunity to study the social dynamics of collective action in a way that is difficult in a state society such as our own. We wanted to know how, outside of formal leadership or institutions, real-world collective behavior, including violence, is initiated.”

The researchers said their work suggests that diminishing a leader’s impact may prevent an original spark of violence. Yet the study also suggests that once violence begins, participants are likely to join in from throughout the entire group’s population. Once initiated within a network, violent tendencies and groups propagate.

In addition, the study offers a mathematical system to observe multiple groups over a period of time and determine who the leaders are in the overall population.

About this psychology research article

Additional co-authors of the study are Richard Wrangham of Harvard University, Rose McDermott of Brown University, and James Fowler of the University of California-San Diego.

Source: Jim Shelton – Yale
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image credited to Luke Glowacki.
Original Research: Full open access research for “Formation of raiding parties for intergroup violence is mediated by social network structure” by Luke Glowacki, Alexander Isakov, Richard W. Wrangham, Rose McDermott, James H. Fowler, and Nicholas A. Christakis in PNAS. Published online October 10 2016 doi:10.1073/pnas.1610961113

Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article

[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]Yale. “Targeting the Social Networks of Group Violence.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 10 October 2016.
<https://neurosciencenews.com/group-violence-social-networks-5259/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]Yale. (2016, October 10). Targeting the Social Networks of Group Violence. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved October 10, 2016 from https://neurosciencenews.com/group-violence-social-networks-5259/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]Yale. “Targeting the Social Networks of Group Violence.” https://neurosciencenews.com/group-violence-social-networks-5259/ (accessed October 10, 2016).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]


Abstract

Formation of raiding parties for intergroup violence is mediated by social network structure

Intergroup violence is common among humans worldwide. To assess how within-group social dynamics contribute to risky, between-group conflict, we conducted a 3-y longitudinal study of the formation of raiding parties among the Nyangatom, a group of East African nomadic pastoralists currently engaged in small-scale warfare. We also mapped the social network structure of potential male raiders. Here, we show that the initiation of raids depends on the presence of specific leaders who tend to participate in many raids, to have more friends, and to occupy more central positions in the network. However, despite the different structural position of raid leaders, raid participants are recruited from the whole population, not just from the direct friends of leaders. An individual’s decision to participate in a raid is strongly associated with the individual’s social network position in relation to other participants. Moreover, nonleaders have a larger total impact on raid participation than leaders, despite leaders’ greater connectivity. Thus, we find that leaders matter more for raid initiation than participant mobilization. Social networks may play a role in supporting risky collective action, amplify the emergence of raiding parties, and hence facilitate intergroup violence in small-scale societies.

“Formation of raiding parties for intergroup violence is mediated by social network structure” by Luke Glowacki, Alexander Isakov, Richard W. Wrangham, Rose McDermott, James H. Fowler, and Nicholas A. Christakis in PNAS. Published online October 10 2016 doi:10.1073/pnas.1610961113

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.