Decision-Making: A New Distribution of Tasks in Our Prefrontal Cortex?

Summary: Study reveals how specific tasks are distributed to different areas within the prefrontal cortex to help with decision-making processes.

Source: Paris Brain Institute

The “Motivation, Brain and Behavior” team, co-directed by Mathias Pessiglione (Inserm) at the Paris Brain Institute, proposes in a study published in the Journal of Neuroscience a new approach to understand how our prefrontal cortex makes decisions.

Decision-making: costs and benefits

Making a decision is based on a fine balance between costs and benefits. In other words, when faced with several options, we must identify the one that will provide the greatest reward with the least effort. When we are faced with this situation, which is almost all the time in our lives, a series of operations take place in our brain to evaluate the different possibilities that are presented to us and choose the best one.

“If the role of the prefrontal cortex in the evaluation of effort and reward is well accepted, the functional role of each sub-region is subject to debate, because the results obtained in different studies are contradictory,” explains Nicolas Clairis, first author of the study, currently a post-doctoral fellow at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne (EPFL, Switzerland).

Deliberation and confidence in one’s own choices

In an attempt to answer this question, Mathias Pessiglione’s team at the Paris Brain Institute adopted another approach, in order to clarify the distribution of roles in the prefrontal cortex. To do this, they took into account the metacognitive part of the decision, i.e. the costs and benefits of the deliberation itself (spending time thinking to have more confidence in one’s decision).

Thus, in a decision such as “Do I continue up to the pass to get the view of the other valley?”, one must evaluate not only the option under consideration, i.e., the effort to be made (you have to climb all the way up the scree and that seems difficult) and the reward to come (I’ve been told that the view is really nice from up there), but also the confidence in the choice under consideration (am I right in wanting to continue?) and the time of deliberation (do I need to think about it more?)

The researchers presented 39 participants with several preference tasks that ranged from ratings — do you like this option a little, a lot, or not at all? – as well as binary decisions — do you prefer option A or B? Are you willing to put in this much effort for this much reward? These tests were combined with functional imaging (fMRI).

A new distribution of tasks in our prefrontal cortex

Their results confirm the role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in assigning a value to the different options presented during a choice. Thus, the activity of this region increases according to the value of the promised reward and decreases according to the cost of the effort required to obtain it.

This shows the outline of two heads
Their results confirm the role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in assigning a value to the different options presented during a choice. Image is in the public domain

The more dorsal regions of the prefrontal cortex are more associated with the metacognitive variables proposed by the Paris Brain Institute’s team.

Confidence in one’s own choices is represented in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) activity, while deliberation time is reflected active in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC).

“Here we confirm the value of distinguishing between variables that determine the decision (effort and reward) and those that determine the meta-decision (when to stop one’s choice) in understanding the functional architecture of the prefrontal cortex.

“The advantage of the new conceptual framework is that it can easily be generalized to other types of behavior than choices. For example, to make a judgment, there is also a metacognitive trade-off between confidence and deliberation: one must have confidence in one’s judgment, and at the same time one cannot take an infinite amount of time before stopping one’s judgment,” concludes Mathias Pessiglione, team leader at the Paris Brain Institute and last author of the study.

About this neuroscience research news

Author: Nicolas Brard
Source: Paris Brain Institute
Contact: Nicolas Brard – Paris Brain Institute
Image: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Closed access.
Value, confidence, deliberation: a functional partition of the medial prefrontal cortex demonstrated across rating and choice tasks” by Mathias Pessiglione et al. Journal of Neuroscience


Value, confidence, deliberation: a functional partition of the medial prefrontal cortex demonstrated across rating and choice tasks

Deciding about courses of action involves minimizing costs and maximizing benefits. Decision neuroscience studies have implicated both the ventral and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC and dmPFC) in signaling goal value and action cost, but the precise functional role of these regions is still a matter of debate.

Here, we suggest a more general functional partition that applies not only to decisions but also to judgments about goal value (expected reward) and action cost (expected effort). In this conceptual framework, cognitive representations related to options (reward value and effort cost) are dissociated from metacognitive representations (confidence and deliberation) related to solving the task (providing a judgment or making a choice).

We used an original approach aiming at identifying consistencies across several preference tasks, from likeability ratings to binary decisions involving both attribute integration and option comparison. fMRI results in human male and female participants confirmed the vmPFC as a generic valuation system, its activity increasing with reward value and decreasing with effort cost.

In contrast, more dorsal regions were not concerned with the valuation of options but with metacognitive variables, confidence being reflected in mPFC activity and deliberation time in dmPFC activity.

Thus, there was a dissociation between the effort attached to choice options (represented in the vmPFC) and the effort invested in deliberation (represented in the dmPFC), the latter being expressed in pupil dilation.

More generally, assessing commonalities across preference tasks might help reaching a unified view of the neural mechanisms underlying the cost/benefit tradeoffs that drive human behavior.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.