This shows the outline of a head and brain. Behind are two people fighting.
According to the authors, this neural mechanism could inform the development of neural and behavioral treatment interventions for learned violence. Credit: Neuroscience News

Aggression Is Contagious: Observing Violence Primes the Brain for Aggression

Summary: A new study shows that observing violence can make individuals more likely to act aggressively later, but the effect depends on familiarity. Male mice who watched familiar peers attack others became more violent afterward, driven by amygdala neurons that “prime” aggression.

When these neurons were inhibited, the learned aggression disappeared, while activating them heightened violent responses. These findings highlight how social context and brain circuits combine to shape the spread of violence.

Key Facts:

  • Familiarity Matters: Only observing aggression by familiar peers—not strangers—led to later violence.
  • Amygdala Link: Aggression-priming neurons in the amygdala activated during familiar attacks.
  • Intervention Potential: Manipulating these neurons suppressed or promoted later aggressive behavior.

Source: SfN

People who repeatedly observe aggression have a higher likelihood of engaging in violent behavior later in life.

In a new Journal of Neuroscience paper, Jacob Nordman and colleagues, from Southern University of Illinois School of Medicine, used mice to explore the environmental factors and neural mechanisms that lead to the aggression that witnesses later acquire. 

In a behavioral paradigm created by this research group, mice observed known peers or unfamiliar strangers attack intruder mice.

Only male witnesses later displayed increased aggression themselves, and this happened only after watching familiar peers attack intruders. 

What neural mechanism might be driving this behavior in the bystander males? As male mice behaved in the paradigm, the researchers recorded activity from neurons in a part of the amygdala that is implicated in aggression priming.

Elaborating on this, says Nordman, “We previously found that these neurons are involved in an ‘aggression priming’ effect, meaning that being a perpetrator of an attack increases the likelihood of attacking again. For example, imagine getting in an argument with a coworker or family member.

“Afterwords, your agitation and frustration make you more likely to have another outburst.”

The researchers theorized that these neurons might be active in male witnesses observing violent peers because the familiarity makes them mirror their friends’ own aggression priming. Indeed, these neurons were active in males as they saw familiar—but not unfamiliar—attacks.

Notably, artificially inhibiting these neurons suppressed later aggression after witnessing peers, and activating these neurons while males watched violent strangers promoted attacking behavior in observers later.  

These findings shed light on aggression learned via observation, suggesting that not only proximity, but also familiarity of attackers may be risk factors for behaving violently later, at least in males.

According to the authors, this neural mechanism could inform the development of neural and behavioral treatment interventions for learned violence.

About this neuroscience and aggression research news

Author: SfN Media
Source: SfN
Contact: SfN Media – SfN
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: The findings will appear in Journal of Neuroscience

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. Society’s increasingly violent sporting events also serve as bad examples of how boys, and even girls, can behave towards one another.

    I’ve always been bewildered and troubled by a person’s moral or psychological ability to throw a serious punch without physical provocation. Also disturbing are the only-too-eager onlookers. … In the early 1980s, I’d see from a distance the mostly-male ‘audience’ at the after-classes fights between a pair of almost-always male students, one of whom was needed to initiate the barbaric exchange.

    A few years later, during my own troubled-teen years, I observed how by ‘swinging first’ a guy potentially places himself in an unanticipated psychological disadvantage — one favoring the combatant who chooses to patiently wait for his opponent to take the first swing, perhaps even without the fist necessarily connecting.

    Just having the combatant swing at him before he’d even given his challenger a physical justification for doing so seemed to instantly create a combined psychological and physical imperative within to react to that swung fist with justified anger. In fact, such testosterone-prone behavior may be reflected in the typically male (perhaps unconsciously strategic) invitation for one’s foe to ‘go ahead and lay one on me,’ while tapping one’s own chin with his forefinger.

    Yet, it’s a theoretical advantage not widely noticed by both the regular scrapper mindset or general society. Instead of the commonly expected advantage of an opponent-stunning first blow, the hit triggers an infuriated response earning the instigator multi-fold returned-payment blows.

    Nevertheless, matters should remain peaceful, or at least non-violent, if every party shows the other due respect. And, of course, everyone follows the basic rule: Only a physical first swing will justify a returned swing. And, similarly, a verbal assault is merited only when in response to one.

    Seriously, boxing was bad enough as a professional sport, but now there’s (most notably) the barbaric ‘ultimate fighting’. It uses barely covered knuckles and even bare knees for knock-out blows — yet it’s legally selling live-viewing tickets to eagerly excited individuals and commercial-time slots to legitimate business advertisers.

Comments are closed.