Playing Action Video Games May Increase Capability for a Suicide Attempt

A new study by Texas Tech researchers examines the acquired capability for suicide.

Among individuals already thinking about suicide, those who play action video games may be significantly more capable of attempting it than those who play other video game categories, according to a new study from Texas Tech University.

Researchers in the Department of Psychological Sciences examined the relationship between video game play and the acquired capability for suicide, with the moderating effects of video game category and gender. The team published its findings in a recent issue of the peer-reviewed journal Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking.

The research was based on the interpersonal theory of suicide by psychologist Thomas Joiner, which says a person can develop a capability for suicide through exposure to physically painful or psychologically provocative events.

“What we know from previous research is that not everyone who thinks about suicide goes on to attempt or die by suicide,” said the study’s lead author, Sean Mitchell, a doctoral candidate in clinical psychology. “What the interpersonal theory of suicide brought in was the acquired capability for suicide, which is meant to differentiate who may think about suicide but never attempt versus someone who thinks about suicide and does go on to attempt.

“Acquired capability is an increased fearlessness about death, not being as afraid to die, and also an increased pain tolerance – not being as sensitive to pain. Increased acquired capability allows individuals to overcome the fear and pain that would inhibit a suicide attempt.”

An important caveat to the research is it’s only applicable to people already thinking about suicide, what researchers call suicide ideation.

The research also doesn’t give a clear picture as to whether violent video games cause an increased acquired capability for suicide.

“We didn’t assess change over time,” Mitchell said. “Some studies say people play violent video games, which causes them to be more aggressive. Other studies say there’s no association. Other studies say the opposite: people who are already more violent seek out violent video games. We see findings that show all of it, so there’s not a clear picture. Without doing intensive study over a long period of time, we can’t really say what causes what.”

The study included data from 228 students at Texas Tech who reported playing video games weekly, largely male (65.5 percent) and Caucasian (74.1 percent).

Participants were asked to report what categories of video games they played:

  • Action games: First-person shooter, horror, fighting, sports or crime/war games, such as “Call of Duty,” the “HALO” series, “Left for Dead,” “Resident Evil,” “Streetfighter,” “Mortal Kombat,” “Tomb Raider” and “Grand Theft Auto”
  • Adventure games: Role-playing, multiplayer online or adventure games, such as “The Sims” and “World of Warcraft”
  • Simulation games: Wii, PlayStation Move, vehicle simulation, sports, racing or music games, such as “Guitar Hero”
  • Educational/traditional games: Puzzles, educational or traditional games, such as “Solitaire,” “Chess,” “Minesweeper” or “Tetris”

“The more hours of video games you play, the higher your acquired capability tended to be,” Mitchell said. “But if we took into consideration what kinds of video games you’re playing, we saw that if you play action games, which tend to be more violent, there is a stronger relationship between hours of video game play and acquired capability. However, if you don’t play action games, there was no relationship. So, hours of video game play is associated with increased acquired capability only when they report playing action games.”

Image shows people playing video games.
The research also doesn’t give a clear picture as to whether violent video games cause an increased acquired capability for suicide. Image is adapted from the Texas Tech press release.

However, because action games aren’t the only types of games that contain violence, the reality may be more definitive than the study’s results.

“Violence could show up in adventure games as well, so by us having it be just action games, it’s probably a slightly more conservative estimate of that association than if we said ‘violent video games,’” Mitchell said. “If we had the question rephrased that way, we might have seen a stronger relationship.”

About this psychology research

In addition to Mitchell, the study’s other authors are Danielle Jahn, an assistant professor at the University of Maryland’s School of Medicine who earned her master’s and doctorate at Texas Tech; Evan Guidry, a clinical psychology doctoral candidate in the Texas Tech Department of Psychological Sciences; and Kelly Cukrowicz, an associate professor of clinical psychology, chair of the institutional review board and director of Texas Tech’s Suicide and Depression Research Program.

Source: Glenys Young – Texas Tech
Image Source: The image is in the public domain.
Original Research: Abstract for “The Relationship Between Video Game Play and the Acquired Capability for Suicide: An Examination of Differences by Category of Video Game and Gender” by Mitchell Sean M., Jahn Danielle R., Guidry Evan T., and Cukrowicz Kelly C in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. Published online December 2015 doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0171


Abstract

The Relationship Between Video Game Play and the Acquired Capability for Suicide: An Examination of Differences by Category of Video Game and Gender

This study examined the relationship between video game (VG) play and the acquired capability for suicide (ACS), as well as the moderating effects of VG category and gender on this relationship. Participants were 228 college students who played VGs on a weekly basis and who completed self-report assessments of VG play, painful and provocative events, and the ACS. Results indicated that there was a significant positive association between hours of VG play and the ACS. The action category of VGs was a significant moderator of the relationship between hours of VG play and the ACS after adjusting for previous painful and provocative events. Gender did not significantly moderate the relationship between hours of VG play and the ACS, and there was no significant three-way interaction between hours of VG play, playing action category VGs, and gender. This suggests that individuals who play many hours of action VGs may be more capable of lethal self-harm if they experience suicide ideation, although this association does not exist for individuals who play other categories of VGs.

“The Relationship Between Video Game Play and the Acquired Capability for Suicide: An Examination of Differences by Category of Video Game and Gender” by Mitchell Sean M., Jahn Danielle R., Guidry Evan T., and Cukrowicz Kelly C in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. Published online December 2015 doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0171

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. “Acquired capability is an increased fearlessness about death, not being as afraid to die, and also an increased pain tolerance – not being as sensitive to pain. Increased acquired capability allows individuals to overcome the fear and pain that would inhibit a suicide attempt.”…..or so says the above study’s lead author, Sean Mitchell. These kinds of pseudoscience studies demand the harshest, most personal criticism. Generally, “capability” is assumed by the 100’s of millions, or even billion+, Modern English speakers to imply a “capacity to engage in an action or behavior”. But, “fearlessness”, or “fearfulness”, or even simply “fear”, is considered by ME speakers to be an emotion, or a mental state of mind. Mitchell is thus conflating a feeling with a (possible) future action. That’s absurd, illogical, and irrational. So “acquire capability” means to attain more skill. There’s no emotional component to skill acquisition. Is Mitchell going to thus claim that my Buddhist studies, which have lead me to largely accept the fact that I will die someday in the future, also made me more suicidal? Isn’t that the logical, rational result of Mitchell’s claims? Do I need to continue with the very nebulous concept of “pain tolerance”? How about a study on the GermanWings pilot who murdered over 100 people in a psychiatric-drug fueled suicide-by-commercial airliner?
    Honestly, people, your irrational and illogical psychobabble, or “Psycho Babel”, is truly amusing!

Comments are closed.