Changing how we think about warm perception

Summary: Mouse study reveals cooling receptors in the skin are critical for the perception of warmth. The findings challenge long-standing beliefs about non-painful temperature perception.

Source: MDC

A team of neuroscientists at Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC) have made an unexpected discovery about the way mice perceive warming sensations. It’s counterintuitive: cooling receptors in the skin are critical for the perception of warmth.

The finding, recently published in the journal Neuron, challenges the predominant model of non-painful temperature perception, and provides clues about the way not just mice, but also humans, consciously detect warmth.

“When we grab a cup of coffee with our hands, and we can quickly feel its warmth, this is happening because not only neurons activated by warming are at play, but also neurons inactivated by it,” said Ricardo Paricio-Montesinos, co-first paper author and neuroscientist from the MDC. “Without the second type, our data from mice suggest that we would either need much longer to feel it or perhaps we wouldn’t even sense warming at all.”

A mysterious sensation

Since the late 1800s, neuroscientists have theorized that dedicated pathways or “labeled lines” convey only warm or only cool sensations from the skin to the brain. While there has been some evidence of this in humans and primates, it has been difficult to prove.

Professor Gary Lewin, who heads MDC’s Molecular Physiology of Somatic Sensation Lab teamed up with Dr. James Poulet, who heads MDC’s Neural Circuits and Behavior Lab to study non-painful temperature perception in mice. “Temperature is still a mysterious sensation,” Poulet said. “It is very understudied, especially compared to vision, touch or hearing.”

The mouse’s ability to perceive non-painful temperature changes has not been closely investigated. Through a series of behavioral studies, they discovered that mice detect temperature changes with same high level of acuity as humans – licking a water dispenser in response to 1ºC of warming and 0.5ºC of cooling.

“For the first time, we could show that mice basically feel warmth and cooling just exactly the same as we do,” Lewin said.

“They have the exact same thresholds as humans.”

A bigger surprise

When neural pathways thought to be associated with warming were blocked, the mice would lick the dispenser in response to 2ºC of warming, revealing perception was diminished but not gone. This indicates those pathways are helpful, but not essential to perceive warmth. In contrast, when the pathway associated with cooling was blocked by turning off the trmp8 gene, the mice could not perceive warmth at all.

“We were really surprised,” said Dr. Frederick Schwaller, co-first author and post-doc in the Lewin Lab. “We initially tried to train these mice to detect skin warming as a control, but we stumbled on the most important finding in the paper sort of by chance.”

Upon closer inspection of nerve cells in the forepaw, the researchers observed two things. First, no nerve cells were solely dedicated to warming. Rather, they found most nerve cells fired an electrical signal in response to temperature and blunt pressure.

This shows a handprint in thermal light
Infrared (thermal) imaging: Warm fingerprints left on a table surface after touching it with the hand. The image is credited to Lewin/Poulet Lab, MDC.

“That is puzzling,” Lewin said, “How does the nervous system figure out if the neuron’s activity is because of warm, cold or mechanical force?”

The answer lies in the second thing the team found: a population of nerve cells that are always firing at the forepaw baseline temperature of 27ºC. As the temperature rises, these cells decrease their activity. That decrease appears to be the key.

Compared, not labeled

The team theorizes that the mouse is able to detect warmth because one population of neurons increases activity, while the cool neurons decrease activity. Two signals going in opposite directions generates a pattern that conveys “warm” to the brain. This is distinct from cooling, in which all the neurons increase activity, so the pattern is all going in the same direction.

“The use of two populations makes it much easier for the mouse to unambiguously say that’s warming, that’s cooling,” Lewin said.

When the cooling pathway was blocked, the cool cells were silent and no activity was transmitted to the brain. Without that contributing to an opposite signal pattern, the mice did not perceive warmth, the researchers conclude.

The researchers anticipate the mouse’s sensations reflect what is happening in humans because we have the same receptors and nerves that convey information from the skin to the spinal cord and brain. Further studies will be required to confirm humans exhibit the same pattern, and to determine where and how the signals are compared in the brain or spinal cord.

[divider]About this neuroscience research article[/divider]

Source:
MDC
Media Contacts:
Gary Lewin – MDC
Image Source:
The image is credited to Lewin/Poulet Lab, MDC.

Original Research: Open access
“The sensory coding of warm perception”. Ricardo Paricio-Montesinos et al.
Neuron doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.035.

Abstract

The sensory coding of warm perception

Highlights
• Mice, like humans, perceive forepaw warming (≥1°C) and discriminate warm from cool
• Warm-activated and warm-silenced polymodal C-fibers both signal forepaw warming
• Mice lacking the cool-sensitive ion channel TRPM8 are unable to perceive warm
• The inability to perceive warm is associated with loss of warm-silenced C-fibers

Summary
Humans detect skin temperature changes that are perceived as warm or cool. Like humans, mice report forepaw skin warming with perceptual thresholds of less than 1°C and do not confuse warm with cool. We identify two populations of polymodal C-fibers that signal warm. Warm excites one population, whereas it suppresses the ongoing cool-driven firing of the other. In the absence of the thermosensitive TRPM2 or TRPV1 ion channels, warm perception was blunted, but not abolished. In addition, trpv1:trpa1:trpm3−/− triple-mutant mice that cannot sense noxious heat detected skin warming, albeit with reduced sensitivity. In contrast, loss or local pharmacological silencing of the cool-driven TRPM8 channel abolished the ability to detect warm. Our data are not reconcilable with a labeled line model for warm perception, with receptors firing only in response to warm stimuli, but instead support a conserved dual sensory model to unambiguously detect skin warming in vertebrates.

[divider]Feel Free To Share This Neuroscience News.[/divider]

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive the latest neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email daily from NeuroscienceNews.com
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. We do not sell email addresses. You can cancel your subscription any time.