Summary: A new study reveals temperature may influence voter behavior. Researchers note increases in state temperatures between elections are related to increased voter turn out and support for the incumbent party. Additionally, higher temperatures motivated some to vote for smaller political parties.
Higher voter turnout and an increase in votes for the incumbent political party are linked to state-level increases in temperature during US presidential elections.
Political rebellions and riots have been associated with warmer weather, but until now, there has been little research on its potential influence on peaceful and democratic political behavior. A new study, published in the open-access journal Frontiers in Psychology, has uncovered a connection between changes in temperature and voting behavior in the United States of America.
“We found that increases in state-level temperatures from one election to another are related to increases in state-level voter turnout, and increases in votes for the incumbent party,” says Jasper Van Assche, who completed this research in the Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology at Ghent University, Belgium.
“Voter behavior data from each state was collected for all the U.S. presidential elections from 1960 to 2016 and compared to the difference between maximum temperature on voting day and that of the previous election day,” explains Van Assche. “We found that for every 10C increase in temperature, voter turnout increased by 1.4%.”
The study also revealed that a rise in temperature motivated some citizens to cast their vote for the smaller political parties (Greens, Libertarians, Independents). Counteracting this, was the finding that warmer weather was a stronger motivator for some citizens to vote for the government currently in power.
“Although these effects are rather small compared to the ‘usual suspects’ that predict voting, they might play a role in close races,” says Van Assche.
The study details one such case; the 2000 presidential election. Applying the findings of the study, Van Assche and his co-authors suggests a mere 10C (1.8oF) increase in temperature may have made Al Gore the 43rd U.S. President instead of George W. Bush, as Gore would have won in Florida.
Van Assche is keen to explain that his results were not affected by other factors that can influence voter behavior.
“Importantly, the relationship between voter behavior and turnout remained true even when we took into account the ‘usual suspects’ that can have an effect – the president being available for reappointment, the incumbent president being elected or not (Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Gerald Ford were Vice Presidents), presidential approval ratings, whether the president’s party had a majority in Congress during the two last years, and change in state gross domestic product (GDP), amongst others.”
The study analyzed changes in temperature (an increase or decrease in temperature on voting day, when compared to the previous election day), rather than absolute temperature because of the latter’s potential effects on the results. An absolute temperature of 30oC would be a normal temperature for California, but hot in Alaska. Moreover, absolute temperature can be linked to other factors that may affect voting behavior. For example, poverty is generally higher in countries with hotter climates.
It is hoped that future studies will delve deeper and increase our knowledge of what can influence voter behavior.
“There is a large amount of research on voter behavior, but little attention has been paid to the seemingly illogical factors that can influence the way people vote. Future studies could expand our understanding by tapping into smaller levels of analyses (e.g., cities or counties) or by including emotions (such as anger) which might explain some of the effects,” concludes Van Assche.
About this neuroscience research article
Source: Melissa Cochrane – Frontiers Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain. Original Research: Full open access research for “When the Heat Is On: The Effect of Temperature on Voter Behavior in Presidential Elections” by Jasper Van Assche, Alain Van Hiel, Jonas Stadeus, Brad J. Bushman, David De Cremer and Arne Roets in Frontiers in Psychology. Published online June 8 2017 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00929
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]Frontiers “Voter Behavior Influenced by Hot Weather.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 20 August 2017. <https://neurosciencenews.com/voting-heat-7336/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]Frontiers (2017, August 20). Voter Behavior Influenced by Hot Weather. NeuroscienceNew. Retrieved August 20, 2017 from https://neurosciencenews.com/voting-heat-7336/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]Frontiers “Voter Behavior Influenced by Hot Weather.” https://neurosciencenews.com/voting-heat-7336/ (accessed August 20, 2017).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
When the Heat Is On: The Effect of Temperature on Voter Behavior in Presidential Elections
Hot temperatures lead to heightened arousal. According to excitation transfer theory, arousal can increase both antisocial and prosocial behavior, depending on the context. Although many studies have shown that hot temperatures can increase antisocial behavior, very few studies have investigated the relationship between temperature and prosocial behavior. One important prosocial behavior is voting. We analyzed state-level data from the United States presidential elections (N = 761). Consistent with excitation transfer theory, which proposes that heat-induced arousal can transfer to other activities and strengthen those activities, changes in temperature and voter turnout were positively related. Moreover, a positive change in temperature was related to a positive change in votes for the incumbent party. These findings add to the literature on the importance of non-ideological and non-rational factors that influence voting behavior.
“When the Heat Is On: The Effect of Temperature on Voter Behavior in Presidential Elections” by Jasper Van Assche, Alain Van Hiel, Jonas Stadeus, Brad J. Bushman, David De Cremer and Arne Roets in Frontiers in Psychology. Published online June 8 2017 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00929