How Does the Brain Learn?

Summary: A new, open-source model of synaptic plasticity in the neocortex could propel understanding of how learning occurs in the brain.

Source: University of Montreal

Everyone knows the human brain is extremely complex—but how does it learn, exactly? Well, the answer may be a lot simpler than commonly believed.

An international research team involving Université de Montréal has achieved a major advance in accurately simulating the synaptic changes in the neocortex that are thought to be key to learning, opening the door to a greater understanding of the brain.

The scientists’ study—featuring an open-source model—was published June 1 in Nature Communications.

“This opens up a world of new directions for scientific inquiry into how we learn,” said Eilif Muller, an IVADO assistant research professor at UdeM and a Canada CIFAR AI Chair, who co-led the study at the Blue Brain Project of the École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), in Switzerland.

Muller moved to Montreal in 2019 and is pursuing his research at the Architectures of Biological Learning Laboratory, which he founded at the CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center in association with UdeM and Mila, the Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute.

“Neurons are shaped like trees, and synapses are the leaves on their branches,” said Muller, the study’s co-senior author.

“Prior approaches to model plasticity have ignored this tree structure, but now we have the computational tools to test the idea that synaptic interactions on branches play a fundamental role in guiding learning in vivo,” he said.

“This has important implications for understanding the mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and schizophrenia, but also for developing powerful new AI approaches inspired by neuroscience.”

Muller collaborated with a group of scientists from the EPFL’s Blue Brain Project, Université de Paris, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Instituto Cajal (Spain), and Harvard Medical School to come up with a model of synaptic plasticity in the neocortex based on data-constrained postsynaptic calcium dynamics.

How does it work? It’s complicated—but ultimately, simpler than you might think.

The brain is made up of billions of neurons that communicate with each other by forming trillions of synapses. These connection points between neurons are complex molecular machines that are constantly changing as a result of external stimuli and internal dynamics, a process commonly referred to as synaptic plasticity.

In the neocortex, a key area associated with learning of high-level cognitive functions in mammals, pyramidal cells (PCs) account for 80 to 90 percent of neurons and are known to play a major role in learning. Despite their importance, the long-term dynamics of their synaptic changes have been experimentally characterized between only a few types of PCs, and shown to be diverse.

As a result, there has been only limited understanding of the complex neural circuits that they form, especially across the stereotypical cortical layers, which dictate how the diverse regions of the neocortex interact.

Muller and his colleagues’ innovation was to use computational modeling to come up with a more comprehensive view of the synaptic plasticity dynamics governing learning in these neocortical circuits.

By comparing their results to the available experimental data, they showed in their study that their synaptic plasticity model can capture the varied plasticity dynamics of the diverse PCs making up the neocortical microcircuit. And they did so using only one unified model parameter set, indicating the plasticity rules of the neocortex could be shared across pyramidal cell-types, and thus be predictable.

This shows data from the study
Testing plasticity model generalization on the L4-PC to L2/3-PC connection type. a 3-D rendering of a representative pair of connected L4-PC to L2/3-PC in the in silico model. Inset shows a magnified view of the synapses mediating the connection (yellow spheres). b Evolution over time of simulated EPSP amplitude during a typical plasticity induction protocol (top left; one pairing shown out of 100). Mean EPSP amplitudes (top right) are shown before (baseline; blue) and after (long term; orange) the induction protocol. c Comparison of EPSP ratios in silico and in vitro for positive and negative timings and with presynaptic NMDAR blocker MK801. Experimental data and simulations without MK801 on the left panel, with MK801 (in vitro) and γd = 0 (in silico) on the right panel. Welch’s unequal variances two-sided t-test was n.s. for every protocol (p-value from negative to positive stimulation timing: 0.268, 0.209 MK801, 0.959 MK801; n = 100). Experimental data (in vitro) from Rodríguez-Moreno and Paulsen42. Population data reported as mean ± SEM. Credit: The Researchers

Most of these plasticity experiments were performed on brain slices of rodents in vitro, where the calcium dynamics driving synaptic transmission and plasticity are significantly altered compared to learning in the intact brain in vivo. Importantly, the study predicts qualitatively different plasticity dynamics from the reference experiments performed in vitro.

If confirmed by future experiments, the implications for our understanding of plasticity and learning in the brain would be profound, Muller and his team believe.

“What is exciting about this study is that this is further confirmation for scientists that we can overcome gaps in experimental knowledge using a modeling approach when studying the brain,” said EPFL neuroscientist Henry Markram, the Blue Brain Project’s founder and director.

“In addition, the model is open source, available on the Zenodo platform,” he added.

“Here we have shared hundreds of plastic pyramidal cell connections of different types. Not only is it the most extensively validated plasticity model to date, but it also represents the most comprehensive prediction of the differences between plasticity observed in a petri dish, and in an intact brain.

“This leap is made possible because of our collaborative team-science approach. Moreover, the community can take it further and develop their own versions by modifying or adding to it—this is open science, and it will accelerate progress.”

About this synaptic plasticity research news

Author: Press Office
Source: University of Montreal
Contact: Press Office – University of Montreal
Image: The image is credited to the researchers

Original Research: Open access.
A calcium-based plasticity model for predicting long-term potentiation and depression in the neocortex” by Giuseppe Chindemi et al. Nature Communications


A calcium-based plasticity model for predicting long-term potentiation and depression in the neocortex

Pyramidal cells (PCs) form the backbone of the layered structure of the neocortex, and plasticity of their synapses is thought to underlie learning in the brain.

However, such long-term synaptic changes have been experimentally characterized between only a few types of PCs, posing a significant barrier for studying neocortical learning mechanisms.

Here we introduce a model of synaptic plasticity based on data-constrained postsynaptic calcium dynamics, and show in a neocortical microcircuit model that a single parameter set is sufficient to unify the available experimental findings on long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) of PC connections.

In particular, we find that the diverse plasticity outcomes across the different PC types can be explained by cell-type-specific synaptic physiology, cell morphology and innervation patterns, without requiring type-specific plasticity.

Generalizing the model to in vivo extracellular calcium concentrations, we predict qualitatively different plasticity dynamics from those observed in vitro.

This work provides a first comprehensive null model for LTP/LTD between neocortical PC types in vivo, and an open framework for further developing models of cortical synaptic plasticity.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.