Summary: A new study reveals nine ending prices are not universally effective at getting shoppers to the checkout line.
Source: Baylor University.
A traditional belief in retail marketing is that prices ending in “9” – $1.99 or $2.99, for example – will prompt more purchases than a whole number. But is that true? And is a simple one-penny price difference the best tactic to sell more products?
In a new study published in the journal Marketing Letters, marketing researchers in Baylor University’s Hankamer School of Business contend that “nine-ending pricing” is not universally effective. The study, composed of four experiments with 932 consumers, reveals that marketers might experience more success in price-setting if they focus their efforts on identifying – and even modifying – the thinking styles of their target consumers.
“We looked specifically at two styles of thinking – analytic and holistic,” said Lingjiang Lora Tu, Ph.D., assistant clinical professor of marketing at Baylor and the study’s lead author. Chris Pullig, Ph.D., professor and chair of Baylor’s marketing department, served as co-author.
Analytic thinkers, Tu explained, tend to view all the digits in a price as separate and independent, with the focal object being the left-most digit. Holistic thinkers tend to view all the digits as interconnected, with each digit being an inseparable part of the price. The study shows:
1. Analytic thinkers are more subject to nine-ending pricing than holistic thinkers.
“Analytic thinkers tend to view the nine-ending price as lower because of the difference in the left-most digit. In contrast, holistic thinkers tend to view all price digits as a whole and are less subject to the nine-ending price effect,” Tu said. “We identified that when individuals are more inclined to holistic thinking (versus analytic thinking), the effectiveness of a nine-ending pricing tactic is pretty weak.”
2. When holistic thinkers’ cognitive resources are limited – they’re under time pressure, for example – they are more subject to the nine-ending price effect, just as analytic thinkers are.
“Holistic thinkers are not always immune to nine-ending prices. Our research shows that holistic thinking takes more cognitive resources than analytic thinking. When their cognitive resources are limited by time pressure or distractions, holistic thinkers respond to nine-ending prices the same way analytic thinkers do.
That is, they view a nine-ending price as much lower than a round price just one cent higher.” Tu said.
“Our findings suggest that irrespective of consumers’ thinking style, nine-ending prices are most likely to be effective in situations that strain consumers’ resources, such as when shoppers are time-pressured at the checkout counter or distracted by background music or occupied with an interactive product demonstration.”
3. Analytic/holistic thinking style can be manipulated as well as measured.
“Marketers may manipulate thinking style via communication strategies, such as promotion imagery, message framing, website design and retailer environment so that chosen pricing tactics will be more effective,” Tu said.
She added that nine-ending pricing is more effective with chronically analytic thinkers (e.g. Westerners, individualists) than with chronically holistic thinkers (e.g. East Asians, collectivists).
“Given growing cultural diversity of most major markets, identifying chronically holistic and analytic thinkers in regional and local markets will boost the effectiveness and predictive accuracy of managers’ pricing policies,” the researchers wrote.
About this neuroscience research article
Source: Eric Eckert – Baylor University Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com. Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain. Original Research:Abstract for “Penny wise and pound foolish? How thinking style affects price cognition” by Lingjiang Lora Tu, and Chris Pullig in Marketing Letters. Published May 26 2018. doi:10.1007/s11002-018-9460-y
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]Baylor University”$2.99 or $3.00? Will a Penny Difference Get You to the Checkout Counter?.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 30 July 2018. <https://neurosciencenews.com/psychology-penny-difference-9629/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]Baylor University(2018, July 30). $2.99 or $3.00? Will a Penny Difference Get You to the Checkout Counter?. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved July 30, 2018 from https://neurosciencenews.com/psychology-penny-difference-9629/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]Baylor University”$2.99 or $3.00? Will a Penny Difference Get You to the Checkout Counter?.” https://neurosciencenews.com/psychology-penny-difference-9629/ (accessed July 30, 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Penny wise and pound foolish? How thinking style affects price cognition
Nine-ending pricing is a common marketing technique because of the traditional belief that consumers pay more attention to the dollar digits and less attention to the penny digits. This research challenges the universal effectiveness of nine-ending pricing and identifies thinking style as a moderator for the nine-ending price effect with analytic (holistic) thinkers more (less) prone to the effect of nine-ending prices. Further, we examine cognitive resource as a boundary condition for the moderating effect. Our results demonstrate that holistic thinkers are not responsive to nine-ending prices when they have unlimited cognitive resources. With limited cognitive resources (e.g., under time pressure or cognitive load), both holistic and analytic thinkers are subject to the nine-ending price effect. We identify the lack of holistic thinking as a mechanism underlying the nine-ending effect.