Caltech researchers have mapped out a circuit of neurons that is responsible for motor impairment–such as difficulty walking–in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
Because billions of neurons are packed into our brain, the neuronal circuits that are responsible for controlling our behaviors are by necessity highly intermingled. This tangled web makes it complicated for scientists to determine exactly which circuits do what. Now, using two laboratory techniques pioneered in part at Caltech, Caltech researchers have mapped out the pathways of a set of neurons responsible for the kinds of motor impairments–such as difficulty walking–found in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
The work–from the laboratory of Viviana Gradinaru (BS ’05), assistant professor of biology and biological engineering–was published on April 20 in the journal Neuron.
In patients with Parkinson’s disease, gait disorders and difficulty with balance are often caused by the degeneration of a specific type of neuron–called cholinergic neurons–in a region of the brainstem called the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN). Damage to this same population of neurons in the PPN is also linked to reward-based behaviors and disorders, such as addiction.
Previously, researchers had not been able to untangle the neural circuitry originating in the PPN to understand how both addictions and Parkinson’s motor impairments are modulated within the same population of cells. Furthermore, this uncertainty created a barrier to treating those motor symptoms. After all, deep brain stimulation–in which a device is inserted into the brain to deliver electrical pulses to a targeted region–can be used to correct walking and balance difficulties in these patients, but without knowing exactly which part of the PPN to target, the procedure can lead to mixed results.
“The circuits responsible for controlling our behaviors are not nicely lined up, where this side does locomotion and this side does reward,” Gradinaru says, and this disordered arrangement arises from the way neurons are structured. Much as a tree extends into the ground with long roots, neurons are made up of a cell body and a long string-like axon that can diverge and project elsewhere into different areas of the brain. Because of this shape, the researchers realized they could follow the neuron’s “roots” to an area of the brain less crowded than the PPN. This would allow them to more easily look at the two very different behaviors and how they are implemented.
Cheng Xiao, a senior research scientist at Caltech and first author on the study, began by mapping the projections of the cholinergic neurons in the PPN of a rat using a technique developed by the Gradinaru lab called Passive CLARITY Technique, or PACT. In this technique, a solution of chemicals is applied to the brain; the chemicals dissolve the lipids in the tissue and render that region of the brain optically transparent–see-through, in other words–and able to take up fluorescent markers that can label different types of neurons. The researchers could then follow the path of the PPN neurons of interest, marked by a fluorescent protein, by simply looking through the rest of the brain.
Using this method, Gradinaru and Xiao were able to trace the axons of the PPN neurons as they extended into two regions of the midbrain: the ventral substantia nigra, a landmark area for Parkinson’s disease that had been previously associated with locomotion; and the ventral tegmental area, a region of the brain that had been previously associated with reward.
Next, the researchers used an electrical recording technique to keep track of the signals sent by PPN neurons–confirming that these neurons do, in fact, communicate with their associated downstream structures in the midbrain. Then, the scientists went on to determine how this specific population of neurons affects behavior. To do this, they used a technique that Gradinaru helped develop called optogenetics, which allows researchers to manipulate neural activities–in this case, by either exciting or inhibiting the PPN neural projections in the midbrain, using different colors of light.
Using the optogenetic approach in rats, the researchers found that exciting the neuronal projections in the ventral substantia nigra would stimulate the animal to walk around its environment; by contrast, they could stop the animal’s movement by inhibiting these same projections. Furthermore, they found that they could stimulate reward-seeking behavior by exciting the neuronal projections in the ventral tegmental area, but could cause aversive behavior by inhibiting these projections.
“Our results show that the cholinergic neurons from the PPN indeed have a role in controlling both behaviors,” Gradinaru says. “Although the neurons are very densely packed and intermingled, these pathways are, to some extent, dedicated to very specialized behaviors.” Determining which pathways are associated with which behaviors might also improve future treatments, she adds.
“In the past it’s been difficult to target treatment to the PPN because the specific neurons associated with different behaviors are intermingled at the source–the PPN. Our results show that you could target the axonal projections in the substantia nigra for movement disorders and projections in the ventral tegmental area for reward disorders, as addiction is,” Gradinaru says. In addition, she notes, these projections in the midbrain are much easier to access surgically than their source in the PPN.
Although this new information could inform clinical treatments for Parkinson’s disease, the PPN is only one region of the brain and there are many more important examples of connectivity that need to be explored, Gradinaru says. “These results highlight the need for brain-wide functional and anatomical maps of these long-range neuronal projections; we’ve shown that tissue clearing and optogenetics are enabling technologies in the creation of these maps.”
About this Parkinson’s disease research
These results are published in a paper titled, “Cholinergic mesopontine signals govern locomotion and reward through dissociable midbrain pathways.” In addition to Gradinaru and Xiao, other Caltech coauthors include Jounhong Ryan Cho, Chunyi Zhou, Jennifer Treweek, Ken Chan, Sheri McKinney, and Bin Yang.
Funding: The work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Heritage Medical Research Institute, the Pew Charitable Trust, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, and the Sloan Foundation; the Beckman Institute supports the Resource Center on CLARITY, Optogenetics, and Vector Engineering (CLOVER) for technology development and broad dissemination.
Source: Deborah Williams-Hedges – CalTech Image Credit: The image is credited to Ken Chan and Viviana Gradinaru Group at Caltech. Original Research: Full open access research for “Cholinergic Mesopontine Signals Govern Locomotion and Reward through Dissociable Midbrain Pathways” by Cheng Xiao, Jounhong Ryan Cho, Chunyi Zhou, Jennifer B. Treweek, Ken Chan, Sheri L. McKinney, Bin Yang, and Viviana Gradinaru in Neuron. Published online April 20 2016 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.028
Cholinergic Mesopontine Signals Govern Locomotion and Reward through Dissociable Midbrain Pathways
Highlights •Optogenetic characterization of mesopontine cholinergic cells inputs to midbrain •Separable pedunculopontine cholinergic pathways govern locomotion and reward •Laterodorsal tegmental cholinergic inputs to VTA modulates reward •Retrograde tracing reveals mesopontine cholinergic collateralization to VTA and vSNc
Summary The mesopontine tegmentum, including the pedunculopontine and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei (PPN and LDT), provides major cholinergic inputs to midbrain and regulates locomotion and reward. To delineate the underlying projection-specific circuit mechanisms, we employed optogenetics to control mesopontine cholinergic neurons at somata and at divergent projections within distinct midbrain areas. Bidirectional manipulation of PPN cholinergic cell bodies exerted opposing effects on locomotor behavior and reinforcement learning. These motor and reward effects were separable via limiting photostimulation to PPN cholinergic terminals in the ventral substantia nigra pars compacta (vSNc) or to the ventral tegmental area (VTA), respectively. LDT cholinergic neurons also form connections with vSNc and VTA neurons; however, although photo-excitation of LDT cholinergic terminals in the VTA caused positive reinforcement, LDT-to-vSNc modulation did not alter locomotion or reward. Therefore, the selective targeting of projection-specific mesopontine cholinergic pathways may offer increased benefit in treating movement and addiction disorders.
“Cholinergic Mesopontine Signals Govern Locomotion and Reward through Dissociable Midbrain Pathways” by Cheng Xiao, Jounhong Ryan Cho, Chunyi Zhou, Jennifer B. Treweek, Ken Chan, Sheri L. McKinney, Bin Yang, and Viviana Gradinaru in Neuron. Published online April 20 2016 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.028