Shift in Teens’ Perception and Use After Recreational Marijuana is Legalized

Summary: Legalization may have reduced the stigma associated with marijuana use in teens, a new study reports.

Source: UC Davis.

Marijuana use significantly increased and its perceived harm decreased among eighth- and 10th-graders in Washington state following enactment of recreational marijuana laws, according to a study published online in JAMA Pediatrics by UC Davis and Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. There was no change in use or perceived harm among 12th graders or among similar grades in Colorado.

The journal also posted editorials on the impact of legalization of marijuana by Wayne Hall and Megan Weier and by Alain Joffe.

The study authors believe their research is the first in the nation to assess changes in teens’ perceptions and marijuana use before and after legalized recreational use, and compare these attitudes and use in 45 other contiguous states where marijuana use is not legal.

The data showed that legalization of recreational marijuana use significantly reduced perceptions of marijuana’s harmfulness by 14 percent and 16 percent among eighth and 10th graders and increased their past-month marijuana use by 2 percent and 4 percent in Washington state but not in Colorado.

Among states without legalized marijuana use, the perceived harmfulness also decreased by 5 percent and 7 percent for students in the two grades, but marijuana use decreased by 1.3 percent and .9 percent. Among older adolescents in Washington state and all adolescents surveyed in Colorado, there were no changes in perceived harmfulness or marijuana use in the month after legalization.

The researchers compared data on the perceived harmfulness of marijuana use to health and self-reported marijuana use for nearly 254,000 Colorado and Washington state students in the eighth, 10th and 12th grades who participated in the Monitoring the Future survey.

The survey measures drug, alcohol and cigarette use and related attitudes among adolescent students nationwide. The authors compared Washington and Colorado with 45 other states in the contiguous U.S. that did not legalize recreational marijuana use. In a sensitivity analysis, they also compared Washington and Colorado data with 20 states with medical marijuana laws but no recreational marijuana laws; results were unchanged.

The investigators attribute the lack of change in attitudes and marijuana use among teens in Colorado after legalization to a more robust commercialization effort prior to the law taking effect.

Colorado had very developed medical marijuana dispensary systems before recreational use became legal, with substantial advertising which youth were exposed to. Colorado also had lower rates of perceived harmfulness and higher rates of use compared to Washington state and other states where recreational use is not legal.

“While legalization for recreational purposes is currently limited to adults, potential impacts on adolescent marijuana use are of particular concern,” said Magdalena Cerdá, an epidemiologist with the UC Davis Violence Prevention Research Program and first author of the study.

“Some adolescents who try marijuana will go on to chronic use, with an accompanying range of adverse outcomes, from cognitive impairment to downward social mobility, financial, work-related and relationship difficulties. We need to better understand the impact of recreational marijuana use so we’re better prepared to prevent adverse consequences among the most vulnerable sectors of the population,” Cerdá said.

While more targeted research is needed to determine the influence of legalized recreational marijuana use among adolescents and how well the Washington state and Colorado experiences can be generalized to the rest of the U.S., the authors believe that states considering legalized recreational use may also want to consider investing in evidence-based substance abuse prevention programs for adolescents.

The potential effect of legalizing marijuana for recreational use has been a topic of considerable debate since Washington and Colorado first legalized its use for adults in 2012. Alaska, Oregon and Washington, D.C., followed suit in 2014, and voters in California, Massachusetts and Nevada approved recreational use this past November.

Image shows marijuana plants.
Colorado had very developed medical marijuana dispensary systems before recreational use became legal, with substantial advertising which youth were exposed to. Colorado also had lower rates of perceived harmfulness and higher rates of use compared to Washington state and other states where recreational use is not legal. NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the UC Davis press release.

“The perceived harmfulness of marijuana has declined sharply in the U.S. in the last few years, despite the fact that there are adverse consequences associated with marijuana use in some adults and in adolescents,” said Deborah Hasin, a professor of epidemiology at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health and in psychiatry at Columbia University and principal investigator of the study.

“Epidemiologic monitoring of these consequences as more states legalize recreational use, and public education about potential health consequences, are important to protect public health,” Hasin said.

Cerdá noted that the study suggests that legalization of marijuana in Washington reduced stigma and perceived risk of use, which could explain why younger adolescents are using more marijuana after legalization.

“Other potential reasons for the increase in use include increased access to marijuana through third-party purchases, and lower price,” Cerdá said. “Older adolescents may also have had their attitudes and beliefs about marijuana formed before recreational marijuana use was legalized, making it less likely their use would change after legalization.”

About this psychology research article

Funding: The research is funded with grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse R01DA034244 and K01DA030449, and from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism K01AA021511.

Source: Carole Gan- UC Davis
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the UC Davis press release.
Original Research: Abstract for “Association of State Recreational Marijuana Laws With Adolescent Marijuana Use” by Magdalena Cerdá, DrPH, MPH; Melanie Wall, PhD; Tianshu Feng, MS; Katherine M. Keyes, PhD; Aaron Sarvet, MPH; John Schulenberg, PhD; Patrick M. O’Malley, PhD; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, PhD; Sandro Galea, MD, DrPH; Deborah S. Hasin, PhD in JAMA Pediatrics. Published online December 27 2016 doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3624

Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article

[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]UC Davis “Shift in Teens’ Perception and Use After Recreational Marijuana is Legalized.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 27 December 2016.
<https://neurosciencenews.com/marijuana-legalization-perception-5816/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]UC Davis (2016, December 27). Shift in Teens’ Perception and Use After Recreational Marijuana is Legalized. NeuroscienceNew. Retrieved December 27, 2016 from https://neurosciencenews.com/marijuana-legalization-perception-5816/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]UC Davis “Shift in Teens’ Perception and Use After Recreational Marijuana is Legalized.” https://neurosciencenews.com/marijuana-legalization-perception-5816/ (accessed December 27, 2016).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]


Abstract

Association of State Recreational Marijuana Laws With Adolescent Marijuana Use

Importance Historical shifts are occurring in marijuana policy. The effect of legalizing marijuana for recreational use on rates of adolescent marijuana use is a topic of considerable debate.

Objective To examine the association between the legalization of recreational marijuana use in Washington and Colorado in 2012 and the subsequent perceived harmfulness and use of marijuana by adolescents.

Design, Setting, and Participants We used data of 253 902 students in eighth, 10th, and 12th grades from 2010 to 2015 from Monitoring the Future, a national, annual, cross-sectional survey of students in secondary schools in the contiguous United States. Difference-in-difference estimates compared changes in perceived harmfulness of marijuana use and in past-month marijuana use in Washington and Colorado prior to recreational marijuana legalization (2010-2012) with postlegalization (2013-2015) vs the contemporaneous trends in other states that did not legalize recreational marijuana use in this period.

Main Outcomes and Measures Perceived harmfulness of marijuana use (great or moderate risk to health from smoking marijuana occasionally) and marijuana use (past 30 days).

Results Of the 253 902 participants, 120 590 of 245 065(49.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 15.6 (1.7) years. In Washington, perceived harmfulness declined 14.2% and 16.1% among eighth and 10th graders, respectively, while marijuana use increased 2.0% and 4.1% from 2010-2012 to 2013-2015. In contrast, among states that did not legalize recreational marijuana use, perceived harmfulness decreased by 4.9% and 7.2% among eighth and 10th graders, respectively, and marijuana use decreased by 1.3% and 0.9% over the same period. Difference-in-difference estimates comparing Washington vs states that did not legalize recreational drug use indicated that these differences were significant for perceived harmfulness (eighth graders: % [SD], −9.3 [3.5]; P = .01; 10th graders: % [SD], −9.0 [3.8]; P = .02) and marijuana use (eighth graders: % [SD], 5.0 [1.9]; P = .03; 10th graders: % [SD], 3.2 [1.5]; P = .007). No significant differences were found in perceived harmfulness or marijuana use among 12th graders in Washington or for any of the 3 grades in Colorado.

Conclusions and Relevance Among eighth and 10th graders in Washington, perceived harmfulness of marijuana use decreased and marijuana use increased following legalization of recreational marijuana use. In contrast, Colorado did not exhibit any differential change in perceived harmfulness or past-month adolescent marijuana use following legalization. A cautious interpretation of the findings suggests investment in evidence-based adolescent substance use prevention programs in any additional states that may legalize recreational marijuana use.

“Association of State Recreational Marijuana Laws With Adolescent Marijuana Use” by Magdalena Cerdá, DrPH, MPH; Melanie Wall, PhD; Tianshu Feng, MS; Katherine M. Keyes, PhD; Aaron Sarvet, MPH; John Schulenberg, PhD; Patrick M. O’Malley, PhD; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, PhD; Sandro Galea, MD, DrPH; Deborah S. Hasin, PhD in JAMA Pediatrics. Published online December 27 2016 doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3624

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. The legalization of marijuana recently, be its studies among tweens, teens or adults, haven’t been done for long enough periods of time to actually say whether or not: 1. Use would ultimately increase, 2. (And, perhaps this should’ve been my 1st objection/tive) Unless I missed it, the studies were done with 8-12th graders? “Legalization”–infers a stipulation re “who”–does it not? 8-12th grade “youth” can’t yet buy alcohol, cigarettes or vote, or did I miss this too? and, for the sake of time and space, I know of more than 1 well-known and respected defense attorney who was present at the NORML festival in Atlanta almost 40 yrs ago–to speak, not party, on the benefits of legalizing marijuana. He was very learned in how, by legalization, “we” might be able to, not only what I have said above, but also tax it and have some control over what dangerous and harmful chemicals were then being blended in w what kids were buying on the street. Nearly 40yrs later, the marijuana found on the street–at least 400 x more polluted than at the NORML festival decades ago.

    The USA, in order to figure out how legalization affects the country has only to look to several other countries where pot (as well as O D) are, & have been legal for long periods of time to get the answers it’s searching for. Humanity, despite cultural diversities, is, at its core, the same everywhere.

Comments are closed.