Summary: Inserting a microelectrode deep into the brain to measure serotonin and dopamine levels of patients scheduled to receive deep brain stimulation is safe and effective.
Source: Wake Forest University
Scientists at Wake Forest University School of Medicine have demonstrated that a neurosurgical procedure used to research and measure dopamine and serotonin in the human brain is safe.
Their findings are published online in PLOS One, a journal published by the Public Library of Science.
“Dopamine and serotonin are neurotransmitters that affect how people think, feel and act,” said Kenneth T. Kishida, Ph.D., associate professor of physiology and pharmacology and neurosurgery at Wake Forest University School of Medicine and principal investigator of the study. “These neurotransmitters are chemical messengers used by the nervous system to regulate countless functions and processes in the body.”
Measuring dopamine and serotonin in humans, with the speed (10 times per second) and accuracy that Kishida’s team is able to achieve, can only be done during invasive procedures such as deep-brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantation, which is commonly used to treat conditions such as epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Since 2011, Kishida’s research team has collaborated with Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist neurosurgeons Stephen B. Tatter, M.D., Ph.D., and Adrian W. Laxton, M.D., to study these neurotransmitters. To detect and record serotonin and dopamine released from neurons, a carbon fiber microelectrode is inserted deep into the brain of patients who are scheduled to receive a DBS implant to treat their conditions.
After the microelectrode insertion and while patients are awake in the operating room, they perform decision-making tasks similar to playing a simple computer game. As they perform tasks, measurements of dopamine and serotonin are taken in the striatum, the part of the brain that controls cognition, reward and coordinated movements.
For this study, researchers identified 602 patients who had the DBS implantation procedure between January 2011 and October 2020. Of these, 116 patients volunteered to also take part in the research protocol with the carbon fiber microelectrode, and 486 patients did not.
“We compared the infection rate across these two groups and found no significant increase or change,” Kishida said. “The brain is exposed a bit longer for the research procedure, but it does not elevate the risk of infection.”
Kishida’s team noted that infection was observed in 1 (.21%) out of the 486 patients that did not participate in the research procedure and 2 (1.72%) of the 116 patients that did have the procedure.
“These findings show that the research procedures used for monitoring of neurotransmitter release can be performed without increasing the rate of infection,” Kishida said.
According to Kishida, demonstrating the safety of the research procedure is critical for future studies.
“Having a better understanding of how these brain chemicals work in people may lead to improved medications or treatments for movement disorders, substance use disorder or depression,” Kishida said.
Funding: This study was supported by National Institutes of Health F30DA053176, R01DA048096, R01MH121099, R01NS092701, R01MH124115 and KL2TR001421
About this neuroscience research news
Author: Myra Wright
Source: Wake Forest University
Contact: Myra Wright – Wake Forest University
Image: The image is in the public domain
Original Research: Open access.
“Intracranial approach for sub-second monitoring of neurotransmitters during DBS electrode implantation does not increase infection rate” by Dr. Kishida et al. PLOS One
Abstract
Intracranial approach for sub-second monitoring of neurotransmitters during DBS electrode implantation does not increase infection rate
Introduction
Currently, sub-second monitoring of neurotransmitter release in humans can only be performed during standard of care invasive procedures like DBS electrode implantation. The procedure requires acute insertion of a research probe and additional time in surgery, which may increase infection risk. We sought to determine the impact of our research procedure, particularly the extended time in surgery, on infection risk.
Methods
We screened 602 patients who had one or more procedure codes documented for DBS electrode implantation, generator placement, programming, or revision for any reason performed at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center between January 2011 through October 2020 using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for infection. During this period, 116 patients included an IRB approved 30-minute research protocol, during the Phase 1 DBS electrode implantation surgery, to monitor sub-second neurotransmitter release. We used Fisher’s Exact test (FET) to determine if there was a significant change in the infection rate following DBS electrode implantation procedures that included, versus those that did not include, the neurotransmitter monitoring research protocol.
Results
Within 30-days following DBS electrode implantation, infection was observed in 1 (0.21%) out of 486 patients that did not participate in the research procedure and 2 (1.72%) of the 116 patients that did participate in the research procedure. Notably, all types of infection observed were typical of those expected for DBS electrode implantation.
Conclusion
Infection rates are not statistically different across research and non-research groups within 30-days following the research procedure (1.72% vs. 0.21%; p = 0.0966, FET). Our results demonstrate that the research procedures used for sub-second monitoring of neurotransmitter release in humans can be performed without increasing the rate of infection.
