Flame Retardant Exposure Found to Lower IQ in Children

Summary: Children whose mothers were exposed to PBDEs during pregnancy may have a lower IQ than their peers who did not experience prenatal exposure, a new study reports. Researchers found that every 10 fold increase of maternal PBDE levels was associated with a drop of 3.7 IQ points in her child.

Source: UCSF.

A hazardous class of flame retardant chemicals commonly found in furniture and household products damages children’s intelligence, resulting in loss of IQ points, according to a new study by UC San Francisco researchers.

The study, published Aug. 3, 2017, in Environmental Health Perspectives, included the largest meta-analysis performed on flame retardants to date, and presented strong evidence of polybrominated diphenyl ethers’ (PBDE) effect on children’s intelligence.

The study comes as the debate over flame retardant chemicals continues to flare up; on July 25, legislation was introduced in the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to ban PBDEs and all other flame retardant chemicals from furniture and children’s products in sold in the City and County of San Francisco.

“Despite a series of bans and phase-outs, nearly everyone is still exposed to PBDE flame retardants, and children are at the most risk,” said UCSF’s Tracey Woodruff, professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and a member of the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies. “Our findings should be a strong wake-up call to those policymakers currently working to weaken or eliminate environmental health protections.”

The findings go beyond merely showing a strong correlation: using rigorous epidemiological criteria, the authors considered factors like strength and consistency of the evidence to establish that there was “sufficient evidence” supporting the link between PBDE exposure and intelligence outcomes. Furthermore, a recent report by the National Academies of Sciences endorsed the study and integrated evidence from animal studies to reach similar conclusions that PBDEs are a “presumed hazard” to intelligence in humans.

Prenatal PDBE exposure damages intelligence

Researchers examined data from studies around the world, covering nearly 3,000 mother-child pairs. They discovered that every 10-fold increase in a mom’s PBDE levels led to a drop of 3.7 IQ points in her child.

“A 3.7-point decrease in IQ might not sound like a lot, but on a population-wide level it means more children who need early interventions and families who may face personal and economic burdens for the rest of their lives,” said Juleen Lam, an associate research scientist at UCSF’s Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment (PRHE) and the study’s lead author.

“Many people are exposed to high levels of PBDEs, and the more PBDEs a pregnant woman is exposed to, the lower her child’s IQ,” said Woodruff. “And when the effects of PBDEs are combined with those of other toxic chemicals such as from building products or pesticides, the result is a serious chemical cocktail that our current environmental regulations simply don’t account for.”

The researchers also found some evidence of a link between PDBE exposures and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but concluded that more studies are necessary to better characterize the relationship.

Flame retardants still ubiquitous despite phase-out, bans

PBDEs first came into widespread use after California passed fire safety standards for furniture and certain other products in 1975. Thanks to the size of the Californian market, flame retardants soon became a standard treatment for furniture sold across the country. The additives received a boost from tobacco companies: since many furniture fires are caused by burning cigarettes, these companies lobbied heavily for stringent furniture safety regulations.

Image shows baby feet.
Researchers examined data from studies around the world, covering nearly 3,000 mother-child pairs. They discovered that every 10-fold increase in a mom’s PBDE levels led to a drop of 3.7 IQ points in her child. NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the UCSF news release.

Mounting evidence of PDBEs’ danger prompted reconsideration and starting in 2003 California, other states, and international bodies approved bans or phase outs for some of the most common PBDEs. PBDEs and similar flame retardants are especially concerning because they aren’t chemically bonded to the foams they protect. Instead, they are merely mixed in, so can easily leach out from the foam and into house dust, food, and eventually, our bodies.

“The bans, restrictions, and phase out were forward progress towards protecting people’s health, but the problem is that people are still exposed,” said Patrice Sutton, who led the research translation division of PRHE and is a co-author on the study. “Reservoirs of PDBEs can be found in dust, old furniture, and electronic equipment. It’s the horrible gift that keeps on giving.”

In fact, Woodruff has previously found that pregnant women in California have much higher PDBE levels than other pregnant women around the world — the legacy, she believes, of California’s previous flammability standards that paved the way for widespread use of these chemical additives.

Guidelines for avoiding PDBEs during pregnancy are posted on UCSF’s California Childcare Health Program website and on PRHE’s website, but the authors say the needed solution is a change in policy. “The lesson we should learn from our experience with PBDEs is that persistent, harmful chemicals should never have been added to household products in the first place,” said Lam.

About this neuroscience research article

Other authors of the study were Natalyn Daniels of UCSF; Bruce P. Lanphear of Simon Fraser University, Canada; David Bellinger of the Harvard School of Public Health; Daniel A. Axelrad of the US EPA; Jennifer McPartland of the Environmental Defense Fund; Dr. Lissette Davidson of Kaiser Permanente; and Saunak Sen of the University of Tennessee.

Funding: The study was funded by the John Merck Foundation, the U.S. EPA (grants A124617-01 and 83543301) and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (PO1ES022841).

Source: Bennett McIntosh – UCSF
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the UCSF news release.
Original Research: Full open access research for “Developmental PBDE Exposure and IQ/ADHD in Childhood: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis” by Juleen Lam, Bruce P. Lanphear, David Bellinger, Daniel A. Axelrad, Jennifer McPartland, Patrice Sutton, Lisette Davidson, Natalyn Daniels, Saunak Sen, and Tracey J. Woodruff in Environmental Health Perspectives. Published online August 3 2017 doi:10.1289/EHP1632

Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article

[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]UCSF “Flame Retardant Exposure Found to Lower IQ in Children.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 4 August 2017.
<https://neurosciencenews.com/child-iq-flame-retardant-7243/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]UCSF (2017, August 4). Flame Retardant Exposure Found to Lower IQ in Children. NeuroscienceNew. Retrieved August 4, 2017 from https://neurosciencenews.com/child-iq-flame-retardant-7243/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]UCSF “Flame Retardant Exposure Found to Lower IQ in Children.” https://neurosciencenews.com/child-iq-flame-retardant-7243/ (accessed August 4, 2017).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]


Abstract

Developmental PBDE Exposure and IQ/ADHD in Childhood: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND:
In the United States, one in six children are affected by neurodevelopmental disorders, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in flame-retardant chemicals are measured ubiquitously in children.

OBJECTIVE:
We conducted a systematic a systematic review regarding developmental exposure to PBDEs and intelligence or Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and attention-related behavioral conditions in humans.

METHODS:
We searched articles published up to 26 September 2016, and included original studies that quantified exposures to PBDEs incurred any time in proximity to conception or during in utero, perinatal, or childhood time periods. We evaluated the risk of bias of individual studies and the overall quality and strength of the evidence according to the Navigation Guide systematic review methodology. We established criteria in advance to identify studies that could be combined using random effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian-Laird method).

RESULTS:
Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria; 10 studies met the criteria for intelligence and nine for attention-related problems. We rated studies generally with “low” to “probably low” risk of bias and rated the overall body of evidence as “moderate” quality with “sufficient” evidence for an association between Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and PBDEs. Our meta-analysis of four studies estimated a 10-fold increase (in other words, times 10) in PBDE exposure associated with a decrement of 3.70 IQ points (95% confidence interval: 0.83, 6.56). We concluded the body of evidence was of “moderate” quality for ADHD with “limited” evidence for an association with PBDEs, based on the heterogeneity of association estimates reported by a small number of studies and the fact that chance, bias, and confounding could not be ruled out with reasonable confidence.

CONCLUSION:
We concluded there was sufficient evidence supporting an association between developmental PBDE exposure and reduced IQ. Preventing developmental exposure to PBDEs could help prevent loss of human intelligence.

“Developmental PBDE Exposure and IQ/ADHD in Childhood: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis” by Juleen Lam, Bruce P. Lanphear, David Bellinger, Daniel A. Axelrad, Jennifer McPartland, Patrice Sutton, Lisette Davidson, Natalyn Daniels, Saunak Sen, and Tracey J. Woodruff in Environmental Health Perspectives. Published online August 3 2017 doi:10.1289/EHP1632

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.