Summary: How young people use social media impacts their mental health more than how much time they spend on it. Researchers found that reducing harmful comparisons and fostering meaningful connections online can improve mental well-being, reducing loneliness, anxiety, and depression. While quitting social media entirely can reduce anxiety and depression, it may increase loneliness by cutting off social ties.
A balanced approach, teaching intentional engagement, provided benefits like lower loneliness and improved social support. The findings suggest that smarter social media habits, rather than abstinence, can be key to mental health. Researchers envision educational programs to teach young adults to use social media as a tool for connection rather than comparison.
Key Facts:
- Intentional social media use reduced loneliness and social comparisons.
- Complete abstinence reduced depression and anxiety but didn’t improve loneliness.
- Tutorials on mindful social media use encouraged healthier, more meaningful connections.
Source: University of British Columbia
Young people’s mental health may depend on how they use social media, rather than how much time they spend using it, according to a new study by University of B.C. researchers.
The research, led by psychology professor Dr. Amori Mikami (she/her) and published this week in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, examined the effects of quitting social media versus using it more intentionally.
The results showed that users who thoughtfully managed their online interactions, as well as those who abstained from social media entirely, saw mental health benefits—particularly in reducing symptoms of anxiety, depression and loneliness.
With social media use nearly universal among young adults, especially those ages 17-29, concerns over its impact on mental health have grown.
“There’s a lot of talk about how damaging social media can be, but our team wanted to see if this was really the full picture or if the way people engage with social media might make a difference,” said Dr. Mikami.
Instead of treating social media as an all-or-nothing choice, the study explored whether helping young adults learn “smarter” engagement techniques could enhance their well-being.
In the six-week study, 393 Canadian young adults with some mental health symptoms and concerns about social media’s impact on their mental health were split into three groups:
- a control group that continued their usual routines
- an abstinence group asked to stop using social media entirely
- a “tutorial” group that was coached in intentional usage
The tutorials guided participants on fostering meaningful online connections, limiting interactions that encouraged self-comparison, and carefully selecting who they followed.
Both the abstinence and tutorial groups reduced their social media use and experienced fewer social comparisons—a common trigger for anxiety and low self-esteem. While the tutorial group didn’t cut back on social media as much as those who tried to abstain completely, they reported notable improvements in loneliness and fear of missing out (FOMO).
By comparison, those who abstained from social media altogether were more successful in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms, yet reported no improvement in loneliness.
“Cutting off social media might reduce some of the pressures young adults feel around presenting a curated image of themselves online. But, stopping social media might also deprive young adults of social connections with friends and family, leading to feelings of isolation,” said Dr. Mikami.
Dr. Mikami, along with graduate students Adri Khalis and Vasileia Karasavva, used an approach with the tutorial group that emphasized quality over quantity in social media interactions. By muting or unfollowing accounts that triggered envy or negative self-comparisons and prioritizing close friendships, tutorial participants built a healthier online environment.
Rather than passively scrolling, they were encouraged to actively engage with friends by commenting or sending direct messages—a behaviour that tends to deepen meaningful connections while helping users feel more socially supported.
For Dr. Mikami, this balanced approach may be a realistic alternative to complete abstinence, which may not be feasible for many young adults.
“Social media is here to stay,” she said. “And for many people, quitting isn’t a realistic option. But with the right guidance, young adults can curate a more positive experience, using social media to support their mental health instead of detracting from it.”
Dr. Mikami believes the findings can offer valuable insights for mental health programs and schools. She envisions future workshops and educational sessions where young adults learn to use social media as a tool to strengthen their relationships rather than as a source of comparison and stress. This approach, she suggests, could break the cycle of quitting social media only to return later, sometimes with worse effects.
The research emphasizes that young people’s well-being is closely tied to how they engage. By offering alternative ways to interact online, Dr. Mikami’s team has shown that positive mental health outcomes are possible without sacrificing the social connectivity that platforms provide.
As she put it: “For many young people, it’s not about logging off. It’s about leaning in—in the right way.”
About this neurodevelopment and stress research news
Author: Erik Rolfsen
Source: University of British Columbia
Contact: Erik Rolfsen – University of British Columbia
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News
Original Research: Open access.
“Logging Out or Leaning In? Social Media Strategies for Enhancing Well-Being” by Amori Mikami et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology General
Abstract
Logging Out or Leaning In? Social Media Strategies for Enhancing Well-Being
Social media use is endemic among emerging adults, raising concerns that this trend may harm users. We tested whether reducing the quantity of social media use, relative to improving the way users engage with social media, benefits psychological well-being.
Participants were 393 social media users (ages 17–29) in Canada, with elevated psychopathology symptoms, who perceived social media to negatively impact their life somewhat.
They were randomized to either (a) assistance to engage with social media in a way to enhance connectedness (tutorial), (b) encouragement to abstain from social media (abstinence), or (c) no instructions to change behavior (control).
Participants’ social media behaviors were self-reported and tracked using phone screen time apps while well-being was self-reported, over four timepoints (6 weeks in total).
Results suggested that the tutorial and abstinence groups, relative to control, reduced their quantity of social media use and the amount of social comparisons they made on social media, with abstinence being the most effective.
Tutorial was the only condition to reduce participants’ fear of missing out and loneliness, and abstinence was the only condition to reduce internalizing symptoms, relative to control.
No condition differences emerged in eating pathology or the tendency to make social comparisons in an upward direction. Changes in social media behaviors mediated the effects of abstinence (but not of tutorial) on well-being outcomes.
Participant engagement and perceptions of helpfulness were acceptable, but the abstinence group possibly perceived the content as less helpful. In conclusion, using social media differently and abstaining from social media may each benefit well-being.
