BGU researchers have discovered that arachnophobes overestimate spider size compared with other neutral animals that do not elicit fear. The findings could be useful in treating phobias.
The new study published in the journal, Biological Psychology, consisted of two experiments measuring attractiveness (valence) and the self-relevance role in neutral (birds, butterflies) vs. aversive (spiders) animal size estimation.
“We found that although individuals with both high and low arachnophobia rated spiders as highly unpleasant, only the highly fearful participants overestimated the spider size,” explains Dr. Tali Leibovich, a Ph.D. researcher at BGU’s Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience.
The research was born from a lab experience when Dr. Noga Cohen noticed a spider crawling and her spider-phobic colleague, Dr. Leibovich, asked her to get rid of it. Dr. Cohen could not understand why Dr. Leibovich was afraid and thought the spider was small, while Dr. Leibovich insisted the spider was large. “How could this be if we both saw the same spider?” asked Dr. Cohen.
In the study, the researchers had female BGU students complete a questionnaire that measured their fear of spiders and divided the participants into two groups: afraid and unafraid. The results of the first experiment demonstrated that although both groups rated the spider pictures as more unpleasant than the other pictures, only the highly fearful participants overestimated the size of spiders compared to butterflies.
Further experiments showed that size estimation was affected by both the level of unpleasantness and the great fear a participant had of spiders.
“This study revealed how perception of even a basic feature such as size is influenced by emotion, and demonstrates how each of us experiences the world in a unique and different way,” says Dr. Leibovich.
“This study also raises more questions such as: Is it fear that triggers size disturbance, or maybe the size disturbance is what causes fear in the first place? Future studies that attempt to answer such questions can be used as a basis for developing treatments for different phobias.”
This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement 295644 to AH.
Source: Andrew Lavin – Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Image Source: The image is credited to the researchers.
Original Research: Full open access research for “Itsy bitsy spider?: Valence and self-relevance predict size estimation” by Tali Leibovich, Noga Cohen, and Avishai Henik in Biological Psychology. Published online January 21 2016 doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.01.009
Itsy bitsy spider?: Valence and self-relevance predict size estimation
The current study explored the role of valence and self-relevance in size estimation of neutral and aversive animals. In Experiment 1, participants who were highly fearful of spiders and participants with low fear of spiders rated the size and unpleasantness of spiders and other neutral animals (birds and butterflies). We found that although individuals with both high and low fear of spiders rated spiders as highly unpleasant, only the highly fearful participants rated spiders as larger than butterflies. Experiment 2 included additional pictures of wasps (not self-relevant, but unpleasant) and beetles. The results of this experiment replicated those of Experiment 1 and showed a similar bias in size estimation for beetles, but not for wasps. Mediation analysis revealed that in the high-fear group both relevance and valence influenced perceived size, whereas in the low-fear group only valence affected perceived size. These findings suggest that the effect of highly relevant stimuli on size perception is both direct and mediated by valence.
“Itsy bitsy spider?: Valence and self-relevance predict size estimation” by Tali Leibovich, Noga Cohen, and Avishai Henik in Biological Psychology. Published online January 21 2016 doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.01.009