Summary: A new study reveals the neural processes we use to ignore the sound of our own footsteps and other self made noises. Researchers say the findings may shed new light on how we learn to speak and play music.
A team of scientists has uncovered the neural processes mice use to ignore their own footsteps, a discovery that offers new insights into how we learn to speak and play music.
The research is reported in the journal Nature.
“The ability to ignore one’s own footsteps requires the brain to store and recall memories and to make some pretty stellar computations,” explains David Schneider, an assistant professor at New York University’s Center for Neural Science and one of the paper’s lead authors. “These are the building blocks for other, more important sound-generating behaviors, like recognizing the sounds you make when learning how to speak or to play a musical instrument.”
The research, conducted at Duke University’s School of Medicine, centered on an intuition–that we are usually unaware of the sound of our own footsteps–as a vehicle for understanding larger neural phenomena: how this behavior reveals the ability to monitor, recognize, and remember the sound of one’s own movements in relation to those of their larger environments.
“The capacity to anticipate and discriminate these movement-related sounds from environmental sounds is critical to normal hearing,” Schneider explains. “But how the brain learns to anticipate the sounds resulting from our movements remains largely unknown.”
To explore this, Schneider and his colleagues, Janani Sundararajan and Richard Mooney at Duke’s School of Medicine, designed an “acoustic virtual reality system” for the mice. Here, the scientists controlled the sounds the mice made walking on a treadmill while monitoring the animals’ neural activity, allowing them to identify the neural circuit mechanisms that learn to suppress movement-related sounds.
Overall, they found a flexibility in neural function–the mice developed an adjustable “sensory filter” that allowed them to ignore the sounds of their own footsteps. In turn, this allowed them to better detect other sounds arising from their surroundings.
“For mice, this is really important,” said Schneider. “They are prey animals, so they really need to be able to listen for a cat creeping up on them, even when they’re walking and making noise.”
Being able to ignore the sounds of one’s own movements is likely important for humans as well. But the ability to anticipate the sounds of our actions is also important for more complex human behaviors such as speaking or playing music.
“When we learn to speak or to play music, we predict what sounds we’re going to hear–such as when we prepare to strike keys on a piano–and we compare this to what we actually hear,” explains Schneider. “We use mismatches between expectation and experience to change how we play–and we get better over time because our brain is trying to minimize these errors.”
Being unable to make predictions like this is also thought to be involved in a spectrum of afflictions.
“Overactive prediction circuits in the brain are thought to lead to the voice-like hallucinations associated with schizophrenia while an inability to learn the consequences of one’s actions could lead to debilitating social paralysis, as in autism,” explains Schneider. “By figuring out how the brain normally makes predictions about self-generated sounds, we open the opportunity for understanding a fascinating ability–predicting the future–and for deepening our understanding of how the brain breaks during disease.”
About this neuroscience research article
Funding: The research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01 DC013826), the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation, and a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
Source: James Devitt – NYU Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com. Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain. Original Research:Abstract for “A cortical filter that learns to suppress the acoustic consequences of movement” by David M. Schneider, Janani Sundararajan & Richard Mooney in Nature. Published September 12 2018. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0520-5
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]NYU”We May Hear Others’ Footsteps, but How Do We Ignore Our Own?.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 12 September 2018. <https://neurosciencenews.com/noise-cancel-brain-9851/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]NYU(2018, September 12). We May Hear Others’ Footsteps, but How Do We Ignore Our Own?. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved September 12, 2018 from https://neurosciencenews.com/noise-cancel-brain-9851/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]NYU”We May Hear Others’ Footsteps, but How Do We Ignore Our Own?.” https://neurosciencenews.com/noise-cancel-brain-9851/ (accessed September 12, 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
A cortical filter that learns to suppress the acoustic consequences of movement
Sounds can arise from the environment and also predictably from many of our own movements, such as vocalizing, walking, or playing music. The capacity to anticipate these movement-related (reafferent) sounds and distinguish them from environmental sounds is essential for normal hearing1,2, but the neural circuits that learn to anticipate the often arbitrary and changeable sounds that result from our movements remain largely unknown. Here we developed an acoustic virtual reality (aVR) system in which a mouse learned to associate a novel sound with its locomotor movements, allowing us to identify the neural circuit mechanisms that learn to suppress reafferent sounds and to probe the behavioural consequences of this predictable sensorimotor experience. We found that aVR experience gradually and selectively suppressed auditory cortical responses to the reafferent frequency, in part by strengthening motor cortical activation of auditory cortical inhibitory neurons that respond to the reafferent tone. This plasticity is behaviourally adaptive, as aVR-experienced mice showed an enhanced ability to detect non-reafferent tones during movement. Together, these findings describe a dynamic sensory filter that involves motor cortical inputs to the auditory cortex that can be shaped by experience to selectively suppress the predictable acoustic consequences of movement.