Summary: Researchers propose a new model to help explain how the level of activity in neural networks influences the flow of information.
Source: University of Freiburg.
The brain is organized into a network of specialized networks of nerve cells. For such a brain architecture to function, these specialized networks – each located in a different brain area – need to be able to communicate with each other. But which conditions are required for communication to take place and which control mechanisms work? Researchers at the Bernstein Center Freiburg and colleagues in Spain and Sweden are proposing a new model that combines three seemingly different explanatory models. Their conclusions have now been published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
The synthesis of Dr. Gerald Hahn (Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona/Spain), Prof. Dr. Ad Aertsen (Bernstein Center Freiburg), Prof. Dr. Arvind Kumar (formerly Bernstein Center Freiburg, now KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm/Sweden) and colleagues is based on the theory of dynamic systems and takes particular account of how the level of activity of the respective networks influences the exchange of information. The study combines three prominent explanatory models that have been proposed in recent years: synfire communication, communication through coherence and communication through resonance.
“We believe that our work helps to provide a better understanding as to how neuron populations interact, depending on the state of their network activity, and whether messages from a neuron group in brain area A can reach a neuron group in brain area B or not,” says Arvind Kumar. “This insight is an essential prerequisite in understanding not only how a brain functions locally, within a limited area of the brain, but also more globally, across whole brain areas.”
The scientists were particularly interested in what role activity rhythms occurring in the brain – known as oscillations – play in communication. Typically these oscillations can affect anything from a large group of neurons up to entire brain areas and can either be slow, such as alpha or theta rhythms, or fast, such as the gamma rhythm. In their theoretical model, the researchers were able to show that the interaction of these rhythms with each other plays a significant role in determining whether communication between networks can take place or not. Certain types of interlocking of these rhythms could act as important control mechanisms.
“The possibility of exchanging information depends on many factors, for example whether the oscillations are fast or slow, the frequencies are similar or different, the relationship between the phases and so on,” explains Ad Aertsen. “With our model, we are now able to make specific predictions for each of these cases. The next step will be to test these predictions in experiments.”
Source: Dr. Ad Aertsen – University of Freiburg
Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com.
Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to BCF.
Original Research: Abstract for “Portraits of communication in neuronal networks” by Gerald Hahn, Adrian Ponce-Alvarez, Gustavo Deco, Ad Aertsen & Arvind Kumar in Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Published December 14 2018.
doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0094-0
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]University of Freiburg”Communication Between Neural Networks.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 17 December 2018.
<https://neurosciencenews.com/neural-netwoek-communication-10360/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]University of Freiburg(2018, December 17). Communication Between Neural Networks. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved December 17, 2018 from https://neurosciencenews.com/neural-netwoek-communication-10360/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]University of Freiburg”Communication Between Neural Networks.” https://neurosciencenews.com/neural-netwoek-communication-10360/ (accessed December 17, 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Abstract
Portraits of communication in neuronal networks
The brain is organized as a network of highly specialized networks of spiking neurons. To exploit such a modular architecture for computation, the brain has to be able to regulate the flow of spiking activity between these specialized networks. In this Opinion article, we review various prominent mechanisms that may underlie communication between neuronal networks. We show that communication between neuronal networks can be understood as trajectories in a two-dimensional state space, spanned by the properties of the input. Thus, we propose a common framework to understand neuronal communication mediated by seemingly different mechanisms. We also suggest that the nesting of slow (for example, alpha-band and theta-band) oscillations and fast (gamma-band) oscillations can serve as an important control mechanism that allows or prevents spiking signals to be routed between specific networks. We argue that slow oscillations can modulate the time required to establish network resonance or entrainment and, thereby, regulate communication between neuronal networks.
