Summary: A new machine learning algorithm can predict which tumors were lower-grade gliomas or glioblastoma brain cancer with a high degree of accuracy.Source: YaleAn estimated 18,000 people in the United States will die of brain and spinal cord tumors in 2020. To help doctors differentiate between the severity of cancers in the brain, an international team of researchers led by Dr. Murat Günel, Chair of Neurosurgery at Yale School of Medicine, and Nixdorff-German Professor of Neurosurgery, built a machine learning model that uses complex mathematics to learn how various types of brain tumors look in the brain. The model is designed to “learn” from this gathered data to make predictions and help doctors diagnose the stage of brain cancers faster and more accurately.To test their artificial learning method, the team used 229 patients with brain tumors along a spectrum of how likely they are to become malignant from lower-grade gliomas, which are relatively slow-growing tumors that originate from glial cells of the brain – to glioblastomas, the highly aggressive counterpart to gliomas.“Our machine learning models used to differentiate the tumor types were very accurate,” said Hang Cao, a medical student from Xiangya Hospital working with Dr. Gunel, and the lead author of the study published in European Radiology.The researchers compiled data from a public tumor machine resonance imaging (MRI) database called The Cancer Imaging Archive. Board-certified neuro-radiologists then identified and selected glioma cases, which the researchers used for their model.To test their artificial learning method, the team used 229 patients with brain tumors along a spectrum of how likely they are to become malignant from lower-grade gliomas, which are relatively slow-growing tumors that originate from glial cells of the brain – to glioblastomas, the highly aggressive counterpart to gliomas. The image is credited to Yale.The team found significant differences in how the cancers looked, their volumes in various regions of the brain, and their locations. When taken together, the model could predict which tumors were lower-grade gliomas or glioblastomas with a high degree of accuracy.The timeline for using such a model in a clinical setting is not known at this time. Although it would be possible to implement now as a stand-alone evaluation, the process is not yet integrated into the clinical evaluation of the patient. A clear set of standards will need to be established by the scientific community and then be embraced the manufacturers of software and hardware used in radiology departments.“This work is fundamentally important to our understanding of brain tumors and a great example of the collaborative, multidisciplinary effort we use to advance the field and provide the best care to brain tumor patients,” said co-author Dr. Jennifer Moliterno, Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery at Yale School of Medicine and Clinical Program Leader of the Brain Tumor Program.[divider]About this neuroscience research article[/divider]Source: Yale Media Contacts: Jennifer Chen – Yale Image Source: The image is credited to Yale.Original Research: Closed access “A quantitative model based on clinically relevant MRI features differentiates lower grade gliomas and glioblastoma”. Jennifer Moliterno et al. European Radiology doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06632-8.AbstractSee alsoFeaturedNeuroscienceOpen Neuroscience Articles·January 24, 2020Imbalance between serotonin and dopamine in social anxiety disorderA quantitative model based on clinically relevant MRI features differentiates lower grade gliomas and glioblastomaObjectives To establish a quantitative MR model that uses clinically relevant features of tumor location and tumor volume to differentiate lower grade glioma (LRGG, grades II and III) and glioblastoma (GBM, grade IV).Methods We extracted tumor location and tumor volume (enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, peritumor edema) features from 229 The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LGG and TCGA-GBM cases. Through two sampling strategies, i.e., institution-based sampling and repeat random sampling (10 times, 70% training set vs 30% validation set), LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression and nine–machine learning method–based models were established and evaluated.Results Principal component analysis of 229 TCGA-LGG and TCGA-GBM cases suggested that the LRGG and GBM cases could be differentiated by extracted features. For nine machine learning methods, stack modeling and support vector machine achieved the highest performance (institution-based sampling validation set, AUC > 0.900, classifier accuracy > 0.790; repeat random sampling, average validation set AUC > 0.930, classifier accuracy > 0.850). For the LASSO method, regression model based on tumor frontal lobe percentage and enhancing and non-enhancing tumor volume achieved the highest performance (institution-based sampling validation set, AUC 0.909, classifier accuracy 0.830). The formula for the best performance of the LASSO model was established.Conclusions Computer-generated, clinically meaningful MRI features of tumor location and component volumes resulted in models with high performance (validation set AUC > 0.900, classifier accuracy > 0.790) to differentiate lower grade glioma and glioblastoma.[divider]Feel Free To Share This Machine Learning and Brain Cancer News.[/divider]Join our Newsletter I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )Sign up to receive the latest neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email daily from NeuroscienceNews.comWe hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. We do not sell email addresses. You can cancel your subscription any time.