Summary: Limiting tackling drills during football practice can reduce a player’s exposure to serious head impact, a new study reports.
Source: Virginia Tech.
Virginia Tech researchers measure impacts, suggest ways to make football practice safer.
Nearly three quarters of the football players in the U.S. are less than 14 years old. But amid growing concern about concussion risk in football, the majority of the head-impact research has focused on college and professional players.
Researchers at Virginia Tech are changing that. A new study published in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics suggests that limiting tackling drills in youth football practices could significantly reduce players’ exposure to serious head impacts.
“There are more than three million youth football players in the U.S., but there’s almost no research on this population. We believe that’s it’s possible to engineer safer sports at every level, but first you need the data. There’s an opportunity here to really make a difference,” said Stefan Duma, the Harry Wyatt Professor of engineering in the College of Engineering and a world-renowned expert on injury biomechanics, who led the research. Duma is also the interim director of the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science.
This is the first study examining which activities at youth football practices are associated with the highest risk of head impacts.
“If you know what scenarios carry the highest risk, you can start to design interventions based on that data,” said Steve Rowson, an associate professor of biomedical engineering and mechanics and an author of the paper.
Duma and Rowson followed 34 nine- to 11-year-old players on two Blacksburg youth football teams. The players wore helmets lined with spring-mounted accelerometers, which allowed the researchers to measure head acceleration.
Over 10 games and 55 practices, these instrumented helmets recorded thousands of head impacts, and video footage showed what activity led to each one.
The data showed that some practice drills carried much higher risks of head impacts than others.
Of the strongest 10 percent of impacts the players received, the majority occurred during tackling drills — even though the players spent relatively little practice time on these.
The drill with the highest rate of head impacts was King of the Circle, a tackling drill in which a ball carrier rushes at defenders on the perimeter of a circle. On the other hand, offensive and defensive drills had the lowest rates of head impact — and resemble actual game play more closely than isolated tackling drills like King of the Circle.
Over the course of the season, the youth players experienced more high-magnitude impacts in practices than they did in games — in contrast to college and professional players, who sustain more serious hits during games.
This means that changing the structure of youth football practices could substantially reduce young players’ exposure to dangerous head impacts. While there is no established threshold in youth players for a level of impact that puts a player at risk of a concussion, harder hits are more likely to cause injury.
Based on the results of the study, Duma and Rowson suggest that eliminating the King of the Circle Drill, and reducing the amount of time spent in tackling drills in general, could make practice safer for youth athletes.
As football season starts up again, Duma and Rowson are continuing their research in Blacksburg, and collaborators at Wake Forest University and Brown University are collecting data on additional youth teams. This larger data set will allow the researchers to study how practice structure and head impact risk varies from team to team.
This research is part of a five-year project funded by the National Institutes of Health to track head impact exposure in children, the largest study yet on head impacts in youth football.
Duma and Rowson share their conclusions with the youth teams who participate in the study, which has sometimes inspired coaches to change the way they structure their practices.
“Without the data, you don’t know,” Rowson said. “Doing studies like this provides an opportunity to make data-driven decisions that can ultimately lead to less risk. You don’t need to completely change the game of football to improve safety.”
Duma and Rowson lead Virginia Tech’s helmet research lab, which has won international recognition for evidence-based ratings of football and hockey helmets that give athletes, coaches, and parents the information they need to choose helmets that best reduce concussion risk. This year, the lab is adding bicycle helmets and soccer headgear to their testing program.
About this concussion research article
Source: Eleanor Nelsen – Virginia Tech Image Source: This NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to Virginia Tech. Original Research: Full open access research for “Drill-specific head impact exposure in youth football practice” by Eamon T. Campolettano, BS, Steven Rowson, PhD, and Stefan M. Duma, PhD in Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. Published online August 23 2016 doi:10.3171/2016.5.PEDS1696
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]Virginia Tech. “Some Youth Football Drills Are Riskier Than Others.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 23 August 2016. <https://neurosciencenews.com/head-impact-youth-football-4895/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]Virginia Tech. (2016, August 23). Some Youth Football Drills Are Riskier Than Others. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved August 23, 2016 from https://neurosciencenews.com/head-impact-youth-football-4895/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]Virginia Tech. “Some Youth Football Drills Are Riskier Than Others.” https://neurosciencenews.com/head-impact-youth-football-4895/ (accessed August 23, 2016).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
Drill-specific head impact exposure in youth football practice OBJECTIVE
Although 70% of football players in the United States are youth players (6–14 years old), most research on head impacts in football has focused on high school, collegiate, or professional populations. The objective of this study was to identify the specific activities associated with high-magnitude (acceleration > 40g) head impacts in youth football practices.
A total of 34 players (mean age 9.9 ± 0.6 years) on 2 youth teams were equipped with helmet-mounted accelerometer arrays that recorded head accelerations associated with impacts in practices and games. Videos of practices and games were used to verify all head impacts and identify specific drills associated with each head impact.
A total of 6813 impacts were recorded, of which 408 had accelerations exceeding 40g (6.0%). For each type of practice drill, impact rates were computed that accounted for the length of time that teams spent on each drill. The tackling drill King of the Circle had the highest impact rate (95% CI 25.6–68.3 impacts/hr). Impact rates for tackling drills (those conducted without a blocker [95% CI 14.7–21.9 impacts/hr] and those with a blocker [95% CI 10.5–23.1 impacts/hr]) did not differ from game impact rates (95% CI 14.2–21.6 impacts/hr). Tackling drills were observed to have a greater proportion (between 40% and 50%) of impacts exceeding 60g than games (25%). The teams in this study participated in tackling or blocking drills for only 22% of their overall practice times, but these drills were responsible for 86% of all practice impacts exceeding 40g. CONCLUSIONS
In youth football, high-magnitude impacts occur more often in practices than games, and some practice drills are associated with higher impact rates and accelerations than others. To mitigate high-magnitude head impact exposure in youth football, practices should be modified to decrease the time spent in drills with high impact rates, potentially eliminating a drill such as King of the Circle altogether.
“Drill-specific head impact exposure in youth football practice” by Eamon T. Campolettano, BS, Steven Rowson, PhD, and Stefan M. Duma, PhD in Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. Published online August 23 2016 doi:10.3171/2016.5.PEDS1696