This shows a woman.
The real ratio of male female psychopathy may be about 1.2:1 – up to five times higher than previously suggested. Credit: Neuroscience News

Prevalence of Female Psychopaths: More Common than Believed

Summary: Researchers provide novel insights into female psychopathy, challenging the conventional 6:1 male-to-female psychopath ratio with new evidence suggesting a closer 1.2:1 ratio.

The research indicates that societal gender biases have obscured the true nature and prevalence of female psychopaths, who often employ manipulation and seduction rather than violence to achieve their goals. This revelation not only calls for a reassessment of psychopathy across genders but also signals significant implications for criminal justice and corporate leadership.

Key Facts:

  1. New Ratio Uncovered: Dr. Boddy’s research suggests the real ratio of male-to-female psychopathy could be as low as 1.2:1, indicating female psychopaths are up to five times more common than previously thought.
  2. Gender Bias in Identification: Traditional psychopathy measures, designed around male criminal behavior, fail to capture the more manipulative and seductive tactics employed by female psychopaths.
  3. Implications for Society and Business: The underestimation of female psychopaths has serious repercussions for the criminal justice system and organizational leadership decisions, highlighting a need for gender-inclusive assessment methods.

Source: Anglia Ruskin University

Female psychopaths are up to five times more common than previously thought, according to an expert who will present his work at the Cambridge Festival later this month.
Current scientific evidence suggests that male psychopaths outnumber females by around 6:1. However, expert in corporate psychopathy, Dr Clive Boddy of Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), argues that studies may be failing to identify female psychopaths because they are largely based around profiles of criminal and male psychopaths.
During his talk at ARU’s Cambridge campus on Saturday, 16 March, Dr Boddy will argue that the characteristics of female psychopaths differ from males and that gender bias plays a role in the under-reporting, with society ignoring what people perceive to be male traits when they are displayed by women.
Dr Boddy will present his own research which shows that using measures of primary psychopathy, which exclude psychopathy’s antisocial behavioural characteristics and concentrate on its core elements, the real ratio of male female psychopathy may be about 1.2:1 – up to five times higher than previously suggested.
Referencing research into corporate psychopaths and how they operate in high-achieving roles in the workplace, Dr Boddy will explain how female psychopaths are more manipulative than males, use different techniques to create a good impression, and utilise deceit and sexually seductive behaviour to gain social and financial advantage more than male psychopaths do.
Dr Boddy, Deputy Head of the School of Management at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), said:

“People generally attribute psychopathic characteristics to males rather than to females. So even when females display some of the key traits associated with psychopathy – such as being insincere, deceitful, antagonistic, unempathetic and lacking in emotional depth – because these are seen as male characteristics they may not be labelled as such, even when they should be.
“Also, female psychopaths tend to use words, rather than violence, to achieve their aims, differing from how male psychopaths tend to operate. If female psychopathy expresses differently, then measures designed to capture and identify male, criminal, psychopaths may be inadequate at identifying female non-criminal, psychopaths.
“Female psychopaths, while not as severely psychopathic or as psychopathic as often as males are, have nevertheless been underestimated in their incidence levels and are therefore more of a potential threat to business and society than anyone previously suspected.
“This has implications for the criminal justice system because current risk management decisions involving partners and children may be faulty. It also has implications for organisational leadership selection decisions because female leaders cannot automatically be assumed to be more honest, caring and concerned with issues such as corporate social responsibility.”

Dr Clive Boddy has been researching the effects of having psychopaths in the workplace since 2005 and has published more on corporate psychopaths than any other academic. His research interests include toxic leadership and particularly the effects of corporate psychopaths on employees, organisations and society.

About this psychopathy research news

Author: Jamie Forsyth
Source: Anglia Ruskin University
Contact: Jamie Forsyth – Anglia Ruskin University
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Dr Boddy’s talk at 6pm on Saturday, 16 March will take place at ARU’s campus in East Road, Cambridge, and will also be available to attend virtually.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.