Summary: Researchers reveal how our brain’s reward system tricks us into thinking a more expensive bottle of wine tastes better.
Source: University of Bonn.
When a bottle costs more, the reward center in the brain plays a trick on us.
Previous work from INSEAD Associate Professor of Marketing Hilke Plassmann’s research group did show that a higher price, for instance for chocolate or wine, increased the expectation that the product will also taste better and in turn affects taste processing regions in the brain. “However, it has so far been unclear how the price information ultimately causes more expensive wine to also be perceived as having a better taste in the brain,” says Prof. Bernd Weber, Acting Director of the Center for Economics and Neuroscience (CENs) at the University of Bonn. The phenomenon that identical products are perceived differently due to differences in price is called the “marketing placebo effect”. As with placebo medications, it has an effect solely due to ascribed properties: “Quality has its price!”
The researchers assessed how different prices are translated into corresponding taste experiences in the brain, even if the wine tasted does not differ. 30 participants took part in the study, of which 15 were women and 15 were men, with an average age of around 30 years.
Wine tasting while lying down
The wine tasting took place lying down in an MRI scanner, allowing brain activity to be recorded “online” while participants were tasting the wines. Each time, the price of the wine was shown first. Only then around a milliliter of the respective wine was administrated to the test person via a tube in their mouths. The participants were then asked to rate via a button on a nine-point scale how good the wine tasted to them. Their mouths were then rinsed with a neutral liquid and the next identical wine sample was given for tasting. All of the experiments were performed in the brain scanner at the Life & Brain Center at the University of Bonn.
“The marketing placebo effect has its limits: If, for example, a very low-quality wine is offered for 100 euros, the effect would predictably be absent,” says Prof. Weber. This is why the researchers conducted the tests using an average to good quality red wine with a retail bottle prize of 12 €. In the MRI scanner, the price of this wine was shown randomly as 3, 6 and 18 €. In order to make the study as realistic as possible, the participants were given 45 euros of initial credit. For some of the tastings, the displayed sum was deducted from this account in some of the trials.
“As expected, the subjects stated that the wine with the higher price tasted better than an apparently cheaper one,” reports Professor Hilke Plassmann from the INSEAD Business School, with campuses in Fontainebleau (France), Singapore and Abu Dhabi. “However, it was not important whether the participants also had to pay for the wine or whether they were given it for free.” Identical wine leads to a better taste experience when a greater quality expectation is associated with the wine due to its price.
The measurements of brain activity in the MRI scanner confirmed this. The research team discovered that above all parts of the medial pre-frontal cortex and also the ventral striatum were activated more when prices were higher. While the medial pre-frontal cortex particularly appears to be involved in integrating the price comparison and thus the expectation into the evaluation of the wine, the ventral striatum forms part of the brain’s reward and motivation system. “The reward and motivation system is activated more significantly with higher prices and apparently increases the taste experience in this way,” says Prof. Weber.
How can placebo effects be inhibited?
“Ultimately, the reward and motivation system plays a trick on us,” explains INSEAD post-doctoral fellow Liane Schmidt. When prices are higher, it leads us to believe that a taste is present that is not only driven by the wine itself, because the products were objectively identical in all of the tastings. “The exciting question is now whether it is possible to train the reward system to make it less receptive to such placebo marketing effects,” says Prof. Weber. This may be possible by training one’s own physical perception – such as taste – to a greater extent.
About this neuroscience research article
Source: Bernd Weber – University of Bonn Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is credited to Xenia Grote. Original Research: Full open access research for “How context alters value: The brain’s valuation and affective regulation system link price cues to experienced taste pleasantness” by Liane Schmidt, Vasilisa Skvortsova, Claus Kullen, Bernd Weber & Hilke Plassmann in Scientific Reports. Published online August 14 2017 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08080-0
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]University of Bonn “Why Expensive Wine Appears to Taste Better.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 14 August 2017. <https://neurosciencenews.com/expensive-wine-taste-psychology-7294/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]University of Bonn (2017, August 14). Why Expensive Wine Appears to Taste Better. NeuroscienceNew. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from https://neurosciencenews.com/expensive-wine-taste-psychology-7294/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]University of Bonn “Why Expensive Wine Appears to Taste Better.” https://neurosciencenews.com/expensive-wine-taste-psychology-7294/ (accessed August 14, 2017).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
How context alters value: The brain’s valuation and affective regulation system link price cues to experienced taste pleasantness
Informational cues such as the price of a wine can trigger expectations about its taste quality and thereby modulate the sensory experience on a reported and neural level. Yet it is unclear how the brain translates such expectations into sensory pleasantness. We used a whole-brain multilevel mediation approach with healthy participants who tasted identical wines cued with different prices while their brains were scanned using fMRI. We found that the brain’s valuation system (BVS) in concert with the anterior prefrontal cortex played a key role in implementing the effect of price cues on taste pleasantness ratings. The sensitivity of the BVS to monetary rewards outside the taste domain moderated the strength of these effects. These findings provide novel evidence for the fundamental role that neural pathways linked to motivation and affective regulation play for the effect of informational cues on sensory experiences.
“How context alters value: The brain’s valuation and affective regulation system link price cues to experienced taste pleasantness” by Liane Schmidt, Vasilisa Skvortsova, Claus Kullen, Bernd Weber & Hilke Plassmann in Scientific Reports. Published online August 14 2017 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08080-0