Summary: Study finds a correlation between the construct of personal responsibility and an increased risk of developing OCD and generalized anxiety disorder.
Source: Hiroshima University
A new study has found that people who reported intense feelings of responsibility were susceptible to developing Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) or Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) was published in the International Journal of Cognitive Therapy.
“People with OCD are tortured by repeatedly occurring negative thinking and they take some strategy to prevent it… GAD is a very pervasive type of anxiety. [Patients] worry about everything.” describes Associate Professor Yoshinori Sugiura of the University of Hiroshima.
Anxiety and OCD-like behaviors, such as checking if the door is locked, are common in the general population. However, it is the frequency and intensity of these behaviors or feelings that make the difference between a character trait and disorder.
“For example, you’re using two audio recorders instead of one,” says Sugiura when interviewed. “It’s just in case one fails … having two recorders will enhance your work but if you prepare [too] many recorders … that will interfere with your work.”
A problem Sugiura identifies in psychology is that each disorder that sufferers experience has several competing theories regarding their cause.
“There are too many theories and therapies for mental disorders for one expert to master them all.” elaborates Sugiura.
The goal of this research team (consisting of Sugiura and Associate Professor Brian Fisak (University of Central Florida) was to find a common cause for these disorders and simplify the theories behind them.
Sugiura and Fisak first defined and explored “inflated responsibility”. The team identified 3 types of inflated responsibility: 1) Responsibility to prevent or avoid danger and/or harm, 2) Sense of personal responsibility and blame for negative outcomes and 3) Responsibility to continue thinking about a problem. The research group combined tests used to study OCD and GAD as there had been no previous work that compared these tests in the same study.
To establish whether inflated responsibility was a predictor of OCD or GAD, Sugiura and Fisak sent an online questionnaire to American university students. Through this survey, they found that respondents who scored higher in questions about responsibility were more likely to exhibit behaviors that resemble those of OCD or GAD patients. Personal Responsibility and Blame and the Responsibility to Continue Thinking had the strongest link to the disorders.
The researchers would like to clarify that this preliminary study is not representative of the general population due to the small scale and skewed population (mostly female university students). However, the promising findings suggest that this format can be applied to a larger population and yield similar results.
Sugiura is currently looking into how to reduce responsibility and the preliminary outcomes are positive. When asked for any tips to reduce anxiety or obsessive behaviors he said:
“A very quick or easy way is to realize that responsibility is working behind your worry. I ask [patients] “Why are you worried so much?” so they will answer “I can’t help but worry” but they will not spontaneously think “Because I feel responsibility” … just realizing it will make some space between responsibility thinking and your behavior.”
Norifumi Miyokawa – Hiroshima University
The image is credited to Emma Buchet and Associate Professor Yoshinori Sugiura/University of Hiroshima.
Original Research: Closed access.
“Inflated Responsibility in Worry and Obsessive Thinking”
Yoshinori Sugiura and Brian Fisak. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. doi:10.1007/s41811-019-00041-x
Inflated Responsibility in Worry and Obsessive Thinking
Utilizing two measures of inflated responsibility, the current study provides an examination of the relation between responsibility and both obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms and worry/generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms. More specifically, the goals of the study were twofold. The first goal was to provide an elucidation of the construct of inflated responsibility by conducting a joint factor analysis with two measures commonly utilized to assess responsibly, the Responsibility Attitudes Scale (RAS) and the Responsibility to Continue Thinking Scale (RESP). The second goal was to examine the degree to which the factors obtained from the joint factor analysis predict symptoms of OCD, GAD, and worry. Based on an exploratory factor analysis, a three-factor solution emerged, with factors labeled Harm/Danger Avoidance (HDA), Personal Responsibility/Blame (PRB), and Responsibility to Continue Thinking/Perseverate (RCTP). Based on the results of regression analyses, PRB and RCTP, but not HAD, were found to be significant and unique predictors of OCD symptoms and of worry/GAD symptoms. Overall, this study provides insight into the construct of responsibly and the relation of this construct to psychopathology.