Summary: A new study explores how young children perceive fairness and act on it, revealing nuanced gender differences in sharing behaviors. Researchers found that girls tend to show more compassion in sharing, while boys are more competitive, especially with other boys.
Interestingly, both genders exhibited more envy when boys received more, suggesting boys are often treated with greater envy. These findings highlight how early social behaviors can align with gender stereotypes, potentially impacting fairness attitudes later in life.
Key Facts
- Girls displayed more compassion, while boys showed competitive tendencies.
- Both genders exhibited greater envy when boys received more resources.
- Boys were more compassionate toward girls than other boys.
Source: HHU
How do young children perceive what is fair and what is unfair, and how do they behave as a result?
Three psychologists from Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (HHU), Tilburg University in the Netherlands and the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, show in the scientific journal Nature Communications Psychology that stereotypical gender differences do exist, but that the story is in fact more complicated than that.
The scenario is familiar: Seven-year-old Lukas complains loudly when his friend Henry is allowed one more scoop of ice cream than him. Although – or even because (?) – he feels unfairly treated, he refuses to share his ice cream with his friend Leo, who has none at all. By contrast, Lisa shares her ice cream with Leo. The next day, however, Lukas has chocolate with him, which he happily shares with Lisa.
The first example seems to fit the stereotype: Boys recognise exactly when they are being disadvantaged, yet at the same time they treat other children just as unfairly. Conversely, girls are more willing to share. But this stereotype does not apply in the case of the chocolate.
Three researchers, who originally all worked at HHU, have examined in more detail how this sense of fairness and unfairness develops in children: Professor Dr Tobias Kalenscher, Principal Investigator of the Comparative Psychology research team in Düsseldorf, Dr Lina Oberließen, now at the Wolf Science Center of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, and Professor Dr Marijn van Wingerden from the Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence at Tilburg University.
In Nature Communications Psychology, they describe behavioural experiments they have conducted with 332 children aged between three and eight.
Professor van Wingerden: “We did not have ice cream or chocolate though. Instead, the children were paired up and had to award each other smiley stickers. In some cases, we also added additional costs for the allocating child when they e.g. distributed the stickers equally. And then we observed how the children behaved in various gender constellations.”
Dr Oberließen comments on the results: “We indeed found gender-related effects. Girls showed more compassion than boys. Interestingly however, both genders displayed the same envy when a boy received a larger portion. This suggests that boys in general were treated with higher envy.”
Boys also tend to be more spiteful to other boys: They always selected the maximum possible number of stickers for themselves, even if it meant that their partner was left empty-handed.
So, the fairness attitudes of children are in fact dependent on gender – however, not only on their own gender, but also on the gender of the children they are interacting with.
Van Wingerden: “We identified typical gender stereotypes – girls are more compassionate, while boys are more competitive.”
Oberließen adds: “The story is however more complicated than that. Both genders tend to treat boys with more envy than girls. And boys are significantly more compassionate when it comes to sharing resources with girls than with other boys.”
Professor Kalenscher concludes from the results: “Gender stereotypes permeate today’s society.
“Our study underlines that gendered differences in social behaviour can in fact be observed empirically, even in young children, possibly contributing to cultural gender typecasts in adult life.
“However, we can also see that, at least in the field of fairness preferences, gendered differences solidify over an extended period. This observation leaves room for promoting non-gender-stereotyped fairness attitudes during this critical period of childhood.”
About this neurodevelopment and psychology research news
Author: Arne Claussen
Source: HHU
Contact: Arne Claussen – HHU
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News
Original Research: Open access.
“Egalitarian preferences in young children depend on the genders of the interacting partners” by Marijn van Wingerden et al. Communications Psychology
Abstract
Egalitarian preferences in young children depend on the genders of the interacting partners
In decisions between equal and unequal resource distributions, women are often believed to be more prosocial than men. Previous research showed that fairness attitudes develop in childhood, but their—possibly gendered, developmental trajectory remains unclear.
We hypothesised that gender-related fairness attitudes might depend not only on the gender of the Allocator, but also on that of the Recipient. To examine this, we tested 332 three to 8-year-old children in a paired resource allocation task, with both boys and girls acting as Allocators and Recipients.
We indeed found gender-related effects: girls more than boys aimed to reduce advantageous inequity, and Allocators of both genders were more averse against male Recipients being better off.
Notably, older girls exhibited an envy bias, i.e., they tolerated disadvantageous inequity more when the resource allocation was in favour of other girls than when it favoured boys.
We also observed a gender-related spite gap in boys aged 7-8: unlike girls, boys treated other boys with spite, i.e., they valued unfair distributions in their own favour over equal outcomes, especially if rejecting advantageous inequity was costly.
This pattern hints at contextualised gender-related fairness preferences that evolve with age that could depend on same- and cross-gender past interaction experiences.
