Summary: Researchers report finger configurations used in children for counting and communicating numeric information are associated with number representation in the brain. Additionally, this association can be observed during adulthood.
Source: University of Alabama.
Ask toddlers how old they are, and they are likely to hold up the corresponding number of fingers and say, “this many.”
By the time children begin walking and talking, they’re accustomed to using their fingers to point, grab and even brace for a fall. Children also use their fingers for numerical representation and counting, a common practice for teaching and learning simple arithmetic, such as addition and subtraction.
While children likely won’t rely on finger counting much past the second grade, the practice has evolutionary and neural backgrounds that could have implications for understanding a child’s aptitude for math, according to Dr. Firat Soylu, an educational neuroscientist at The University of Alabama.
Soylu is interested in exploring embodied cognition – the relationship between the body and mind and how the body is related to learning and thinking. Soylu began studying the neural processes of numerical cognition and how we use bodily systems to learn math while deciding on a dissertation topic at Indiana University.
“We are trying to teach all these abstract things to kids – mathematics, English, science – and when you think about the learning process, we don’t really consider how the body plays a role,” Soylu said. “Human beings haven’t changed much in the last 100,000 years, so we’re still using systems that evolved to do other things, like coordinated behaviors of hunting and gathering.”
Soylu is exploring these relationships through campus’ Embodied Learning Design and Educational Neuroscience Lab, or ELDEN, and through collaborative studies across the country.
He is examining the relationship between finger sensorimotor development and numerical development and the implications of this research for mathematics education. He’s also collaborated on a fMRI, or Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, study with the Cognitive Neuroimaging Lab at Indiana University that looks at the neural and behavioral relations between finger sense and arithmetic ability in children ages 7 and 8.
NUMBER, FINGER SENSE
Finger sense, or the ability to distinguish between fingers, is a common test for neuropsychological disorders. The test can be as simple as closing your eyes and naming the finger that has been touched, or more complicated, like using the fingers on the right hand to repeat a pattern of someone touching fingers on the left hand.
Young children struggle with this task because their sensory motor skills aren’t fully learned and refined. Studies have shown finger sense either correlates or predicts math ability, but the results, particularly in behavioral associations, are conflicting, Soylu said.
An fMRI is a specialized brain scan of neural activity that could fill gaps in the literature and point researchers in new directions, even if it doesn’t provide a clear causal measure.
Soylu and colleagues studied the relationship between finger sense and two arithmetic operations – addition and subtraction – through fMRI scans of 24 second and third grade students. The results showed finger sense scores in three clusters of the brain were negatively correlated with brain activity for both addition and subtraction, showing kids with high finger sense scores had lower activation in these areas.
This might be from more efficient functioning of a more developed finger sensorimotor system, which overlaps with the network responsible for arithmetic. Activation in another cluster negatively correlated for only addition, even though it was active for both math tasks. This shows the association of the finger sensorimotor system and addition goes deeper, compared to subtraction, possibly because more intensive finger counting experiences with addition compared to subtraction.
The study supported the hypothesis that fingers provide a necessary scaffold for calculation.
“When you think about the finger sense task, the ability to distinguish between fingers is not only a sensory task, it’s also visuospatial,” Soylu said. “You need to create the visual representation of fingers and then match those with your sensory experience to distinguish between fingers.”
The researchers assumed mathematics memories for addition and subtraction encode differently because of differences in learning experiences, he said.
“This is a part where embodied cognition plays a role in interpreting these results, because when you think about memory, according to the traditional information processing approaches, the content of the memory plays no role in how we store it,” Soylu said. “But according to the embodied interpretation of memory, the memory is actually a simulation of bodily states, so the content of the memory plays a role in how it’s stored in the brain.”
In a recently completed study focusing on how adult participants processed number gestures in his lab, Soylu found evidence for a specific association between conventional finger gestures to represent numbers and numerical magnitude representation in the brain.
The study provides further evidence finger configurations used for communicating number information and counting are associated with number representation in the brain. Further, the study showed the effects of these associations can be observed in adulthood.
To further understand the role of spatial processing in arithmetic, Soylu is collaborating on another fMRI study on how different types of play can affect arithmetic processing, like using blocks to develop visuospatial abilities.
“We can teach kids to count from one to 20, but it’s not number sense, it’s memorization,” Soylu said. “But if you stack or separate the blocks, it can represent quantity, and you develop an approximate number system.”
Educational neuroscience is a relatively new and slowly emerging field.
While the goal is to impact how math is taught, more scientific evidence is needed before diagnostic tools can be formed.
“We’re still understanding all of the mechanisms,” Soylu said. “There are no longitudinal studies that look at finger-related measures and math ability and see the causal relations. We don’t know if it’s finger sense that affects number counting or if finger counting has an affect on finger sense, or if it’s co-developing.”
Soylu said while the driving goal is to be skilled enough to not rely on physical interaction to perform math tasks, it is necessary to go through the stages of physical interaction to enhance math ability. Thus, parents should think about how early interactions during development might affect later cognitive development.
“If development of the sensory motor system is so important for later math skills, we need to think about what type of interactions we need to provide for kids, so that these systems develop,” Soylu said. “I can comfortably say that people shouldn’t discourage the use of fingers for physical interaction when kids are doing math. We’re not computers, so you shouldn’t expect kids to do their computations like computers.”
About this neuroscience research article
Dr. Soylu is an assistant professor of educational psychology and education neuroscience. He is a coauthor on a paper for the Journal of Numerical Cognition that covers some of the research mentioned, with other papers pending.
Source:University of Alabama Publisher: Organized by NeuroscienceNews.com. Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the AGS news release. Original Research: Open access research for”The Differential Relationship Between Finger Gnosis, and Addition and Subtraction: An fMRI Study” by Firat Soylu, David Raymond, Arianna Gutierrez, and Sharlene D. Newman in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Published online January 30 2018. doi:10.5964/jnc.v3i3.102
Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article
[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]University of Alabama “This Many: Unlocking the Relationship Between Math Ability and Fingers.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 25 March 2018. <https://neurosciencenews.com/math-fingers-8682/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]University of Alabama (2018, March 25). This Many: Unlocking the Relationship Between Math Ability and Fingers. NeuroscienceNews. Retrieved March 25, 2018 from https://neurosciencenews.com/math-fingers-8682/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]University of Alabama “This Many: Unlocking the Relationship Between Math Ability and Fingers.” https://neurosciencenews.com/math-fingers-8682/ (accessed March 25, 2018).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]
The Differential Relationship Between Finger Gnosis, and Addition and Subtraction: An fMRI Study
The impact of fingers on numerical cognition has received a great deal of attention recently. One sub-set of these studies focus on the relation between finger gnosis (also called finger sense or finger gnosia), the ability to identify and individuate fingers, and mathematical development. Studies in this subdomain have reported mixed findings so far. While some studies reported that finger gnosis correlates with or predicts mathematics abilities in younger children, others failed to replicate these results. The current study explores the relationship between finger gnosis and two arithmetic operations—addition and subtraction. Twenty-four second to third graders participated in this fMRI study. Finger sense scores were negatively correlated with brain activation measured during both addition and subtraction. Three clusters, in the left fusiform, and left and right precuneus were found to negatively correlate with finger gnosis both during addition and subtraction. Activation in a cluster in the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) was found to negatively correlate with finger gnosis only for addition, even though this cluster was active both during addition and subtraction. These results suggest that the arithmetic fact retrieval may be linked to finger gnosis at the neural level, both for addition and subtraction, even when behavioral correlations are not observed. However, the nature of this link may be different for addition compared to subtraction, given that left IPL activation correlated with finger gnosis only for addition. Together the results reported appear to support the hypothesis that fingers provide a scaffold for arithmetic competency for both arithmetic operations.