Summary: Researchers have discovered that our beliefs, when strongly held, can actually change how we physically experience the world around us.
In a new study, participants were hypnotized and convinced to believe their index finger was either five times smaller or five times larger than its actual size. When participants believed their finger was larger, they could feel two close-together needle pricks as separate points, something they couldn’t do before.
However, when they believed their finger was smaller, their ability to distinguish between the two points got worse.
The findings show how our minds can impact our physical sensations, suggesting that our beliefs can reshape our perception of reality.
The study found that beliefs, when strongly held, can alter physical perceptions. This was demonstrated by participants who were hypnotized to believe their index finger was either five times larger or smaller than its actual size.
When participants were convinced that their index finger was larger, their ability to distinguish two closely spaced needle pricks improved. Conversely, when they believed their finger was smaller, their ability to differentiate between the two points decreased.
The results from this study provide evidence supporting the concept of cognitive penetrability of perception, the idea that our thoughts or beliefs can influence our sensory perceptions.
Two needles feel like one
The researchers measured the tactile perception of their 24 test participants using the two-point discrimination method. This involves the index finger lying relaxed on a device with two needles repeatedly touching the finger painlessly but perceptibly.
“If the needles are far enough apart, we can easily distinguish two points of contact,” explains Hubert Dinse from the Neurological Clinic of Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil.
“But if the needles are very close together, we only feel the touch in one place.”
At a certain distance between the needles, the sensation changes from feeling two needles to feeling just one, although two are presented. This discrimination threshold is stable for each person given normal everyday consciousness.
If the finger were five times bigger
“We wanted to find out whether it’s possible to change this sensation threshold by activating a verbally articulated thought in a person,” explains Albert Newen from the Philosophy Institute II at Ruhr University Bochum.
The research team chose two thought cues: “Imagine your index finger is five times smaller” and “Imagine your index finger is five times bigger.”
To specifically activate these semantic contents, the researchers used hypnotic suggestion. During a controlled state of hypnosis induced by a professional hypnotist, the participant was asked to sincerely accept the first belief for a series of tests and then the second.
The subjects took part in a total of four experiments to determine the sensation threshold in each case: under normal everyday consciousness, under hypnosis without suggestion, and under two hypnotic conditions with the suggestions of a bigger or smaller index finger.
Changes in the sense of touch
“Discrimination thresholds did not differ when measured during normal consciousness and hypnosis without suggestion. This supports our preliminary assumption that hypnosis alone doesn’t lead to changes,” says Martin Tegenthoff.
“However, if the beliefs are induced as suggestions under hypnosis, we observe a systematic change in the tactile discrimination threshold.”
When a test person imagined that their index finger was five times bigger than it actually was, their discrimination threshold improved and they were able to feel two needles, even when they were closer together. When the suggestion was that their index finger was five times smaller, the discrimination threshold worsened.
This means that it is the beliefs that change perception. The behavioral results were supported by parallel recordings of brain activity such as spontaneous EEG and sensory evoked potentials.
The scientific community is divided on the question of whether or not perceptual processes can be influenced by semantic content alone – experts refer to this as the question of cognitive penetrability of perception.
“Our study provides another building block supporting the idea that such top-down influences of beliefs on perception do indeed exist,” stresses Hubert Dinse.
“The beliefs we hold do indeed change how we experience the world.”
The interdisciplinary team at Ruhr University Bochum consisted of researchers from the fields of neuroscience, medicine and philosophy. In addition to team leaders Hubert Dinse, Albert Newen and Martin Tegenthoff, the experiment was conducted by Marius Markmann and Dr. Melanie Lenz from Bergmannsheil.
They were assisted in data collection by Agnė Steponavičiūte and in evaluation by Professor Oliver Höffken. The basic concept was developed by the lead team together with Professor Martin Brüne (LWL University Clinic for Psychiatry, Bochum).
About this neuroscience and perception research news
Author: Meike Driessen Source: RUB Contact: Meike Driessen – RUB Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News
Hypnotic suggestions cognitively penetrate tactile perception through top-down modulation of semantic contents
Perception is subject to ongoing alterations by learning and top-down influences. Although abundant studies have shown modulation of perception by attention, motivation, content and context, there is an unresolved controversy whether these examples provide true evidence that perception is penetrable by cognition.
Here we show that tactile perception assessed as spatial discrimination can be instantaneously and systematically altered merely by the semantic content during hypnotic suggestions. To study neurophysiological correlates, we recorded EEG and SEPs.
We found that the suggestion “your index finger becomes bigger” led to improved tactile discrimination, while the suggestion “your index finger becomes smaller” led to impaired discrimination. A hypnosis without semantic suggestions had no effect but caused a reduction of phase-locking synchronization of the beta frequency band between medial frontal cortex and the finger representation in somatosensory cortex.
Late SEP components (P80–N140 complex) implicated in attentional processes were altered by the semantic contents, but processing of afferent inputs in SI remained unaltered.
These data provide evidence that the psychophysically observed modifiability of tactile perception by semantic contents is not simply due to altered perception-based judgments, but instead is a consequence of modified perceptual processes which change the perceptual experience.