Summary: Understanding how the brain decides what it should pay attention to is key to understanding how prediction plays a tole in autism.
Source: Purdue University
Our brains make our lives easier by predicting what will happen next based on previous experiences. But what happens when those predictive powers don’t work like they should?
Autism spectrum disorder and other neurological disorders involve problems with brain prediction. For example, the brain usually remembers situations that can become dangerous – such as a hot stove or a car coming toward you while you’re crossing the street. For someone with autism, the brain can’t always predict those things.
A professor at Purdue University is discovering how complications with prediction lead to changes in sensory perception and learning impairments, both of which are common symptoms of autism.
“The brain precomputes everything,” said Alexander Chubykin, assistant professor of biological sciences. “When you see something familiar, it immediately tries to remember what it is and that’s how we know what will happen next. My lab is trying to understand how the brain distinguishes between something that is familiar and novel and how that plays into neurological disorders.”
Through his research, Chubykin’s goal is to work on developing new biomarkers to make diagnosing disorders such as autism easier and make advancements toward discovering potential new drugs for treatment.
Understanding how the brain predicts future events is critical when it comes to defining and understanding neurological disorders, Chubykin said. It’s also a key to survival and normal brain function.
“If you see something dangerous, your brain usually recognizes that and predicts something bad could happen.” Chubykin said. “If you have this previous experience and can process this information, you can escape in time. When your brain can’t tell you those things, it’s overwhelming and frightening.”
Chubykin says understanding how the brain decides what it should pay attention to in the first place is key to understanding how prediction plays a role in disorders such as autism. In order for the brain to decide what is novel, it needs to first recognize a sensory stimulus. Recognition of the familiar stimulus leads to a generation of an expectation or prediction. However, when a prior expectation is violated, that leads to a surprise. These surprises are called prediction errors, which is when the senses do not correspond to the brain’s predictions.
When the brain receives surprises, it then wants to minimize that surprise in the future by memorizing it and the corresponding environment, a process otherwise known as learning.
“We continually receive new sensory information, and we learn it,” Chubykin said. “But for someone with a disorder such as autism, it’s not that easy.” In autism, the brain can’t always accurately predict what will happen in the near future from senses such as vision, touch, and hearing.
That’s why people affected by autism often experience “sensory overload,” which is when sensory input overrides prediction. Sensory overload can cause stress and makes it difficult to focus.
“For instance, if I have an umbrella sitting in the corner of my office and I see it every day, my brain knows it’s going to be there and it’s not a surprise,” Chubykin said. “I get used to it being there. But for patients with autism, it might take them a while to process it. It may also take them longer to get used to new environments with a lot of new sensory stimuli, and it’s these details that overwhelm them.”
Chubykin also led recently published research that revealed mice can perceive so-called Kanizsa optical illusions and the neural mechanisms that are involved. The work was published in the Journal of Neuroscience.
“Patients with autism and schizophrenia typically have difficulty perceiving this illusion,” Chubykin said. “This could be significant for diagnostic testing of early detection of autism and schizophrenia in the future. The reason for that is that this illusion tests the ability to do spatial prediction.”
He says in schizophrenia, prediction also is impaired, but it is the complete opposite of autism.
“For patients with schizophrenia, their brains have a higher emphasis on prediction compared to senses,” Chubykin said. “When they’re hallucinating or hearing voices, their internal predictions override their senses.”
Chubykin wants his research to provide answers for both patients and their families. The earlier these disorders can be diagnosed, the quicker patients can get the help they need.
“The more we learn, the more we can help,” Chubykin said.
Chubykin, who is part of Purdue’s College of Science, also is a member of Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience and the Purdue Autism Research Center, which supports autism research, collaboration, courses and professional development opportunities at the university. His work is supported by the Whitehall Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health.
Source:
Purdue University
Media Contacts:
Abbey Nickel – Purdue University
Image Source:
The image is credited to J.F. Podevin.
Original Research: Closed access
“Top-Down Feedback Controls the Cortical Representation of Illusory Contours in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex”. Alexandr Pak, Esther Ryu, Claudia Li and Alexander A. Chubykin.
Journal of Neuroscience doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1998-19.2019.
Abstract
Top-Down Feedback Controls the Cortical Representation of Illusory Contours in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex
Visual systems have evolved to recognize and extract features from complex scenes using limited sensory information. Contour perception is essential to this process and can occur despite breaks in the continuity of neighboring features. Such robustness of the animal visual system to degraded or occluded shapes may also give rise to an interesting phenomenon of optical illusions. These illusions provide a great opportunity to decipher neural computations underlying contour integration and object detection. Kanizsa illusory contours have been shown to evoke responses in the early visual cortex despite the lack of direct receptive field activation. Recurrent processing between visual areas has been proposed to be involved in this process. However, it is unclear whether higher visual areas directly contribute to the generation of illusory responses in the early visual cortex. Using behavior, in vivo electrophysiology, and optogenetics, we first show that the primary visual cortex (V1) of male mice responds to Kanizsa illusory contours. Responses to Kanizsa illusions emerge later than the responses to the contrast-defined real contours in V1. Second, we demonstrate that illusory responses are orientation-selective. Finally, we show that top-down feedback controls the neural correlates of illusory contour perception in V1. Our results suggest that higher-order visual areas may fill in the missing information in the early visual cortex necessary for illusory contour perception.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
Perception of the Kanizsa illusory contours is impaired in neurodevelopmental disorders such as schizophrenia, autism, and Williams syndrome. However, the mechanism of the illusory contour perception is poorly understood. Here we describe the behavioral and neural correlates of Kanizsa illusory contours perception in mice, a genetically tractable model system. We show that top-down feedback controls the neural responses to Kanizsa illusion in V1. To our knowledge, this is the first description of the neural correlates of the Kanizsa illusion in mice and the first causal demonstration of their regulation by top-down feedback.
