Summary: A new study analyzing print cartoons from 1930-2010 reveals intriguing gender differences in humor preferences. Men tend to favor visual jokes, while women prefer humor involving politics or close relationships. However, both genders share a liking for cartoons that explore the complexities of romance.
The research collected data from 3,380 participants attending a cartoon exhibit in London. It also uncovered that more complex jokes with multiple “mindstates” are funnier, but there’s a limit to their comprehensibility.
Key Facts:
- Men favor visual jokes, while women prefer political and relationship-themed humor in print cartoons.
- Complex jokes with multiple “mindstates” are considered funnier up to a limit.
- Both genders enjoy cartoons exploring romantic complexities, but they are least enthusiastic about political humor.
Source: De Gruyter
Men rate visual jokes more highly than women do, whereas women prefer jokes that involve political commentary or the dynamics of close relationships, a new study of print cartoons dating from 1930-2010 finds.
The research, led by Professor Robin Dunbar of the University of Oxford and published in the De Gruyter journal Humor, also found some similarities, with both sexes enjoying cartoons that delve into the complexities of romance.
Study data was collected from 3,380 people attending an exhibit of print cartoons by well-known artists at The Cartoon Museum, London. The humor of such cartoons is strongly visual and often uses a verbal caption to add context and, in many instances, the punchline.
The researchers arranged cartoons of varying complexity in 18 pairs and asked study participants to rate which joke was funnier. The responses were then analyzed according to the ‘mentalizing’ content of the cartoons, participants’ age and sex, and when the cartoon was first published.
More complex jokes with more ‘mindstates’ (“I know what she’s thinking about what he’s saying”) were considered funnier than those that relied on simpler, more slapstick humor. However, such jokes only worked up to a limit of three levels with additional mindstates falling flat: the 2D medium cannot ably handle more detailed reveals like moving 3D images with an additional time perspective.
“Like verbal jokes, cartoons are funnier the more mindstates, essentially characters, they involve,” says Professor Dunbar. “But there is a limit after which they become incomprehensible.”
Participant age didn’t significantly affect the humor rating given to a cartoon, and nor did the time since its publication.
Both sexes clearly considered visual jokes using puns or wordplay and social commentary jokes about domestic marital relationships funnier than any other topic. Men and women were least enthusiastic about political jokes.
However, some modest differences were found between the sexes with women indicating a greater preference for jokes about domestic situations and political commentary while men preferred situational (slapstick) and visual jokes.
This finding may reflect how men and women manage their relationships, the authors surmise. “We argue that these differences in humor preference arise from the remarkable differences in social style of the two sexes,” Professor Dunbar says. “This explanation has previously been overlooked because psychologists and others have concentrated on IQ-type differences, which are minimal.”
About this humor and psychology research news
Author: Mauricio Quiñones
Source: De Gruyter
Contact: Mauricio Quiñones – De Gruyter
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News
Original Research: Open access.
“Why cartoons make (some of) us smile” by Robin Dunbar et al. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research
Abstract
Why cartoons make (some of) us smile
Pocket cartoons are a regular feature of most contemporary newspapers and magazines. As such, they represent a way of conveying complex social and political commentary in a simple visual form. How well we enjoy verbal (oral) jokes depends on the number of mindstates in the joke, and here we ask whether this is also true of visual cartoons.
We use survey data from a sample of 3,380 participants attending a public exhibition of published print media cartoons by well-known cartoonists to determine the extent to which viewers’ ratings of cartoons are determined by the mentalizing content of cartoons, the participants’ gender and age, and the publication date of the cartoon.
We show that the number of mindstates involved in the cartoon affects its appreciation, just as in verbal jokes. In addition, we show that preferred topics vary by age and gender.
While both genders strongly prefer cartoons that explore the complexities of romantic relationships, men rate visual jokes more highly than women do, whereas women prefer jokes that involve political commentary or the dynamics of close relationships.
These differences seem to reflect differences in the way the social worlds of the two genders are organized.
