Summary: Researchers have identified potential drug targets in glioblastoma cancer stem cells, providing a new approach to treat this aggressive brain cancer. By analyzing stem cells derived from patient tumors, scientists found two primary cell subtypes responsible for tumor growth, each with unique vulnerabilities.
The discovery could lead to treatments targeting both subtypes, reducing the likelihood of tumor recurrence. This research, using CRISPR screening across a large patient sample, brings hope for more effective, personalized glioblastoma therapies. If successful, the approach could enhance treatment response and patient prognosis.
Key Facts:
- Two main cell subtypes in glioblastoma drive tumor growth: developmental and injury-response.
- Specific genetic vulnerabilities (OLIG2, MEK, FAK, B1-Integrin) in these cells may be targeted to halt tumor recurrence.
- This is the largest CRISPR screen of glioblastoma stem cells, derived directly from patients.
Source: University of Toronto
A team led by researchers at the University of Toronto has uncovered new targets that could be the key to effectively treating glioblastoma, a lethal type of brain cancer. These targets were identified through a screen for genetic vulnerabilities in patient-derived cancer stem cells that represent the variability found in tumours.
Glioblastoma is the most common type of brain cancer in adults. It is also the most challenging to treat due to the resistance of glioblastoma cancer stem cells, from which tumours grow, to therapy. Cancer stem cells that survive after a tumour is treated go on to form new tumours that do not respond to further treatment.
“Glioblastoma tumors have evaded treatment thus far because their composition is highly variable both within and between tumours,” said Graham MacLeod, co-first author on the study and senior research associate of U of T’s Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research.
“The tumours vary quite a bit from person to person, and even within a single tumour there are multiple cell types that harbour differences at the genetic level.”
The study was published recently in the journal Cancer Research.
A key finding of the research is that the variability among glioblastoma cancer stem cells can be observed across a gradient between two cell subtypes. On one end is the developmental subtype, which resembles cells in which normal neurodevelopment has gone awry, and on the other end is the injury-response subtype, which is an inflammatory state.
The aim of the study was to identify potential treatment methods to target each subtype, thereby tackling tumours in a more holistic manner.
This study follows earlier research published in Cell Reports that identified vulnerabilities in glioblastoma cancer stem cells that impact their sensitivity to chemotherapy.
The next step within this line of research was to study how vulnerabilities in glioblastoma cancer stem cells vary in a large and diverse set of patient-derived cell lines to identify the most common of these vulnerabilities in each of the subtypes.
The team performed CRISPR/Cas9 screens in glioblastoma stem cell lines from 30 patients, making this the largest screening study of its kind. The patient-derived cell lines were generated by the lab of Peter Dirks, professor of surgery and molecular genetics and Chief of the Division of Neurosurgery at SickKids.
Within the cancer stem cell samples, the team found genes responsible for the proliferation of the two cell subtypes that could be targeted to prevent tumour growth. Combining drugs to target both cell subtypes simultaneously could potentially make for a more effective glioblastoma treatment.
“A lot of the research on glioblastoma is conducted with a limited number of immortalized cell lines grown in serum,” said Fatemeh Molaei, co-first author on the study and graduate student at the Donnelly Centre and the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy.
“These cells aren’t the best model as they don’t resemble true glioblastoma cells as much as we would like. The findings from our study represent what we see in a patient’s tumour more accurately because our cell lines are derived directly from a large group of patients.
“It’s through our screens of this group of cell lines that we were able to identify the OLIG2 and MEK genes as drug targets for the developmental cell subtype and the FAK and B1-Integrin genes as targets for the injury-response subtype.”
“It’s been established that there are different subtypes of glioblastoma stem cells, but their differences are not being addressed in the clinic,” said Stéphane Angers, principal investigator on the study and director of the Donnelly Centre.
“In the future, our results will help in designing new treatments that are tailored to patients by targeting the predominant cell subtype, or both subtypes simultaneously,” said Angers, who is also a professor in the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy and U of T’s Temerty Faculty of Medicine.
“The ability of glioblastoma to adapt to therapeutic treatment is its greatest strength and our biggest challenge. Our study increases our understanding of this type of cancer and proposes a different approach to treating it that will hopefully improve the prognosis of patients.”
Funding: This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
About this brain cancer research news
Author: Anika Hazra
Source: University of Toronto
Contact: Anika Hazra – University of Toronto
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News
Original Research: Closed access.
“Fitness Screens Map State-Specific Glioblastoma Stem Cell Vulnerabilities” by Graham MacLeod et al. Cancer Research
Abstract
Fitness Screens Map State-Specific Glioblastoma Stem Cell Vulnerabilities
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults and is driven by self-renewing glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) that persist after therapy and seed treatment refractory recurrent tumors.
GBM tumors display a high degree of intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity that is a prominent barrier to targeted treatment strategies. This heterogeneity extends to GSCs that exist on a gradient between two transcriptional states or subtypes termed developmental and injury-response. Drug targets for each subtype are needed to effectively target GBM.
To identify conserved and subtype-specific genetic dependencies across a large and heterogeneous panel of GSCs, we designed the GBM5K targeted gRNA library and performed fitness screens in a total of 30 patient-derived GSC cultures.
The focused CRISPR screens identified the most conserved subtype-specific vulnerabilities in GSCs and elucidated the functional dependency gradient existing between the developmental and injury-response states.
Developmental-specific fitness genes were enriched for transcriptional regulators of neurodevelopment, whereas injury-response-specific fitness genes were highlighted by several genes implicated in integrin and focal adhesion signaling. These context-specific vulnerabilities conferred differential sensitivity to inhibitors of β1 integrin, FAK, MEK and OLIG2.
Interestingly, the screens revealed that the subtype-specific signaling pathways drive differential cyclin D (CCND1 vs. CCND2) dependencies between subtypes.
These data provide biological insight and mechanistic understanding of GBM heterogeneity and point to opportunities for precision targeting of defined GBM and GSC subtypes to tackle heterogeneity.
