‘Just as Deadly’: Inside the Mind of a Female Serial Killer

Summary: Female serial killers are considered fairly anomalous. Research into females who commit serial killings has been pretty limited, until now. Researchers have identified certain characteristics of female serial killers, finding they tend to be white, married at least once, of at least average intelligence, and are more likely to be employed in healthcare professions.

Source: Penn State

Movies, books and podcasts have popularized the stories of serial killers like Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy, but they also have contributed to the longstanding myth that women are incapable of committing such heinous crimes.

According to Marissa Harrison, associate professor of psychology at Penn State Harrisburg, that myth is dead wrong.

Harrison has spent years studying the sex differences in serial killers and what motivates a woman to kill, a field that has largely been understudied. Her drive to fill research gaps has culminated in her new book, “Just as Deadly: The Psychology of Female Serial Killers.”

“There’s so much rumor and gossip about serial murderers, but the field lacks information on female serial killers,” said Harrison. “I’m a psychological scientist, a data-wrangler. My book presents a psychological science approach to understanding the minds of female serial killers.”

An expert on evolutionary psychology and behavioral neuroscience, Harrison discusses what makes female serial killers so dangerous in the following Q&A.

How are male and female serial killers different?

Harrison: Let’s start with motives. For females, the most common is financial gain, whereas for men it’s often sexual gain. The ways in which they kill also differ. Women’s primary means are poison, and men’s are asphyxiation.

Men are far more likely to target a stranger and to have stalked their victim; women are more likely to target somebody familiar to them and are more than twice as likely to have murdered a spouse or partner. They tend to target the vulnerable — elderly people, ill people or children.

Females tend to have been married at least once; males tend to be single at the time of first crime. Males tend to have a high school education or less; females tend to have some college or more. As for the media’s treatment of serial murderers, my team’s statistical analysis found that the nickname assigned to female serial killers is more likely to convey their gender, like Tiger Woman, versus calling a man the BTK (bind, torture, kill) Killer.

Your book includes 27 case studies. While researching these cases, did anything stand out?

Harrison: What surprised me was how frequently these individuals were victimized as children or adolescents and the frequency of the trauma. To be clear, I feel much more compassion for the victims. But, the serial killers whose cases I outline were often sexually molested, so how do you not have compassion for that? It made me question if they had received the mental health help that they deserved, maybe they wouldn’t have become murderers.

One of the most heinous instances I write about is a woman named Martha Patty Cannon. She killed men, women and children. She kidnapped free people and sold them into slavery. She beat children to death with logs. Once, a child sneezed by her and she threw the child into a fire. Reading her history, which is sparse, I went back to newspapers from the late 1700s to early 1800s.

She was violated by her father, and he was executed by hanging. Think about what a taboo subject that was back then, and that people knew this happened and they hanged the father. It must have been known that he abused her, and the abuse must have been terrible.

Can you give a snapshot of a female serial killer?

Harrison: My colleagues and I came up with a composite based on statistics. She’s probably white, married at least once, maybe multiple times. She’s probably in her 20s or 30s, likely middle class, a Christian, displays at least average intelligence and has average or above average attractiveness.

She is probably employed legally, perhaps in health care or a related field. In fact, we found that 39% of female serial killers were nurses or health care workers. They might have a history of abuse or a recent crisis. And at least one murder will occur in a suburban area.

The people familiar to her are at most risk, especially children, the ill and the elderly. Most likely she murders via poisoning or asphyxiation, and those methods would mimic natural death to people who aren’t really suspecting her.

Did any of the cases you included in your book shock you?

Harrison: Serial murder, in any instance, is shocking. I went into the book knowing the crimes I would find. The shock that I experienced was, we know hindsight is 20-20, but how did nobody see what was happening in some of these cases?

In the book I include the case of Marybeth Tinning. All nine of her children — born between the 1960s and ‘80s — died. The authorities think she killed at least eight of them. They suspect her first child died in unfortunate circumstances, but not the rest.

What shocked me was, OK, now she has three dead children. OK, here’s the fourth. OK, here’s the fifth presented to a local hospital. Some of the media reported that people were calling a hotline saying, aren’t you going to do something?

This shows a spooky looking woman with a shadowy background
Females tend to have been married at least once; males tend to be single at the time of first crime. Image is in the public domain

People noticed what was going on, the shock was how long it took the authorities to act. Authorities think she probably had ‘Munchausen syndrome by proxy,’ that she killed the babies for attention.

What is the main takeaway that you want readers to know about female serial killers?

Harrison: I want readers to know that female serial killers exist. Usually movies, books and podcasts focus on men. The FBI did not recognize female serial killers until the 1990s. They called these crimes sexual killing, and sexual killing is almost always indicative of a male murderer.

But there are well-known women who murdered far more victims than men did. Jolly Jane Toppan was a nurse in Boston in the late 1800s. She killed at least 30 people, but she told the authorities that she thought she killed close to 100.

The authorities have no idea how many people Belle Gunness, a farmer from Indiana, killed. They dug up her farm and in the hog pit found the remains of as many as 100 victims. Women commit murder, and they get away with it.

What do you think our society needs to do to decrease instances of serial killers?

Harrison: My team’s research shows that for female and male serial killers, there is a good chance that mental illness is involved. For males, it’s highly likely; for females, our research showed about 40% demonstrated evidence of mental illness. If instances of mental illness and child abuse continually appear in the histories of these women, maybe mental illness awareness and treatment could prevent some future deaths.

Also, I learned on my travels that life doesn’t work like the show “CSI.” Local police and detectives lack the resources for the type of testing depicted on TV. So, if a series of murders happens, let’s get investigators more resources to address and solve the crimes. It might prevent future victimization.

About this criminal psychology research news

Author: Francisco Tutella
Source: Penn State
Contact: Francisco Tutella – Penn State
Image: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: The book, “Just as Deadly: The Psychology of Female Serial Killers” can be accessed (limited) and purchased in full here.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. All of the female serial killers known to the FBI have been adoptees.

    Adoptees are 4x more likely to take our own lives, are more likely to commit parricide, to be killed at the hands of their parents, to suffer mental health issues and to have addictions.

    The thread running through all of this is adoption. Relinquishment and adoption are TRAUMA. The American Academy if Pediatrics acknowledges the scientific research demonstrating this connection in its statement to its member physicians: “Assume every adoptee and foster child has experienced trauma.” (P. 7 of this document: https://downloads.aap.org/AAP/PDF/hfca_foster_trauma_guide.pdf?_ga=2.253965441.881192584.1667845372-1684549261.1667378771)

    Mother-child separation at birth is TRAUMA. Look it up. When will the average psychologist and therapist finally realize that adoption is trauma, and that as part of their intake session in therapy, they must ask if the client is adopted?

    When will society stop perpetuating its happy adoption myth which is rooted in the desires of the adoptive parents and it in the needs of the actual child? When will society stop gaslighting adult adoptees when we say it is trauma?

    When will society begin to support pregnant mothers in crisis instead of coercing them to give up their own children, telling them they can and will move on with their lives? They are met with trauma, too. When will their parents, and boyfriends stop emotionally abandoning them if they say they want to keep their child?

    When will the shyster, sleazy for-profit adoption companies who like to go by “agency” to sound more official and approved stop forcing women in pregnancy crisis to hand over their babies when they try to change their mind and the agency sics its lawyers on them, telling them the agency will sue if they keep the child and don’t pay back the $$ given them for rent or the sparkly new cell phone or TV they gave the pregnant mother as a bribe?

    When will the adoption companies stop sending the hopeful adoptive parents directly into the labor & delivery room as silent pressure to hand over the baby before bonding personality with their baby?

    When will society open its eyes to the harms inherent in relinquishment and adoption?

    Very disappointing Ms. Harrison didn’t conduct enough research to include the 100% match in FBI-known female serial killers with being adopted. Somehow, somewhere, someone needs to tip off society that adoption is traumatic and harmful!

Comments are closed.