This shows the outline of a man surrounded by clocks and neurons.
Yet, the relation of these cells to memory performance will need to be explored with further research. Credit: Neuroscience News

Mapping Time and Space: Neurons Decode Human Existence Dimensions

Summary: Researchers unveil how neurons in the brain depict time and space, fundamental to human consciousness.

Utilizing special depth electrodes, they studied patients undergoing treatment for epilepsy, revealing “place cells” for spatial awareness and “time cells” for temporal comprehension.

One study showed these cells operate independently yet concurrently during navigation tasks. Another found certain neurons maintained regular temporal patterns regardless of external stimuli speed.

Key Facts:

  1. The brain contains “place cells” and “grid cells” for spatial mapping and “time cells” for temporal tracking.
  2. While navigating a virtual environment, place cells remain consistent, but time cells change based on the task, suggesting time and space are separable neuron dimensions.
  3. Temporally periodic cells (TPCs) exhibit unique periodic behavior across time scales, potentially providing metrics for both time and space in the brain.

Source: UCLA

Two studies led by UCLA researchers offer new insights into the way neurons in the human brain represent time and space—the most basic ingredients of consciousness of human existence and the primary dimensions of experience that allow us to reconstruct the past and envision the future.

The new findings are based on recordings of the activity of single neurons in the brain, from studies led by Dr. Itzhak Fried, a neurosurgeon and researcher at the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, the senior author of two articles in Cell Reports.

Credit: Neuroscience News

Patients who had undergone surgical placement of special depth electrodes developed and implanted by Fried for surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy agreed to perform cognitive tasks while their brain cell activity is recorded for these studies.

Neurons that act as the brain’s GPS system—termed “place cells” and “grid cells”—were discovered initially in rodents, similar findings later described in humans by Fried and colleagues at UCLA in collaboration with Dr. Michael Kahana, professor of Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania and a co-senior author of one of the new studies. The brain’s clock cells, or “time cells,” were identified in more recent years.

In one of the new studies, researchers sought to determine how the brain keeps track of both space and time simultaneously.

“To provide an answer, our patients played a timed navigation game where they alternated between searching for and retrieving gold in a virtual gold mine,” Fried said.

The researchers, including first author Dr. Daniel Schonhaut and co-author Dr. Zahra Aghajan, first identified “time cells” that activated during waiting periods between the patients’ searching periods and retrieval periods.

These “at-rest” time cells would activate one after another, as if each was responsible for counting a different second, throughout the waiting period.

During game navigation, separate “place cells” appeared as participants navigated to specific locations in the virtual mine, with a new set of “time cells” appearing at particular points during navigation.

“When patients alternated from searching for gold—a learning phase—and digging for gold—retrieval—place cells remained unchanged, firing at the same locations, while time cells changed. Thus, while temporal and spatial contexts are jointly represented in the brain, they are dissociable, or separable, dimensions at the neuron level,” Kahana said.

“This is the first study to demonstrate the coexistence of time and place cells in the human brain,” Fried added.

“Together, these neuronal classes constitute a biological basis for the cognitive map of spatiotemporal context that we propose comprises the scaffolding onto which memories are written.”

In the second study, researchers wanted to understand how the brain keeps track of time during an extended period—a single, continuous episode—like when people are watching a movie with no interruptions.

They wondered if neurons would activate periodically—at recurring time intervals—similar to the way certain spatial neurons fire at spatial intervals when a rodent or human moves through an environment.

In spatial situations, a specific set of space-related cells in the brain’s entorhinal cortex forms a grid-like map of the environment, where different scales expressed in modulated firing rates provide a metric, or measure, of space at different distances.

To determine if the “periodicity” present in spatial scales can also be seen in the time-axis, the researchers showed 14 neurosurgical patients an hourlong movie while recording single-neuron activity from multiple brain regions.

Examination of the firing rates revealed that some units exhibited striking periodicity in their firing over the course of the movie, and the time scale of this periodicity varied from unit to unit, ranging from tens of seconds to several minutes.

Fried said the researchers were surprised to find this unique set of neurons, mostly in the entorhinal cortex, that modulated their activity in such a strikingly periodic manner across time scales that extended to minutes.

“Time within the video could be decoded from the activity of this population of neurons,” said Zahra Aghajan, first author of the study also co-authored by Dr. Gabriel Kreiman Professor at Harvard Medical School.

“The ability to extract precise, localized, temporal information from this population of cells shows that their periodic activity constitutes a viable mechanism to encode time.”

When the participants took a memory test after viewing the movie, many of the time cells changed their dominant timing to shorter time scales, suggesting that these cells may play a role in temporal compression of experience required for memory retrieval. Yet, the relation of these cells to memory performance will need to be explored with further research.

The researchers observed that when the video was presented at two different speeds—regular and sped up—a significant percentage of these temporally periodic cells, or TPCs, maintained their dominant time scales, suggesting a degree of regularity regardless of the audiovisual content.

“Our results suggest that TPCs’ temporal periodicity may complement the spatial periodicity of grid cells, together providing scalable metrics for both space and time and enabling the encoding and retrieval of human experience,” Fried said.

About this neuroscience research news

Author: Itzhak Fried
Source: UCLA
Contact: Itzhak Fried – UCLA
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.
A neural code for time and space in the human brain” by Itzhak Fried et al. Cell Reports

Open access.
Minute-scale periodicity of neuronal firing in the human entorhinal cortex” by Itzhak Fried et al. Cell Reports


Abstract

A neural code for time and space in the human brain

Highlights

  • Human medial temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex neurons encode time during task-free delays
  • Time and place are independently represented during timed navigation
  • Time cells remap between contextually similar events with stable place cell firing
  • Population neural activity represents time across multiple events in a sequence

Summary

Time and space are primary dimensions of human experience. Separate lines of investigation have identified neural correlates of time and space, yet little is known about how these representations converge during self-guided experience.

Here, 10 subjects with intracranially implanted microelectrodes play a timed, virtual navigation game featuring object search and retrieval tasks separated by fixed delays.

Time cells and place cells activate in parallel during timed navigation intervals, whereas a separate time cell sequence spans inter-task delays.

The prevalence, firing rates, and behavioral coding strengths of time cells and place cells are indistinguishable—yet time cells selectively remap between search and retrieval tasks, while place cell responses remain stable. Thus, the brain can represent time and space as overlapping but dissociable dimensions.

Time cells and place cells may constitute a biological basis for the cognitive map of spatiotemporal context onto which memories are written.


Abstract

Minute-scale periodicity of neuronal firing in the human entorhinal cortex

Highlights

  • When watching a movie, the activity of human neurons exhibits minute-scale periodicity in time
  • Different neurons maintain or remap their periodicity when playback speed is altered
  • During recognition memory, most neurons remap their periodicity to shorter time scales

Summary

Grid cells in the entorhinal cortex demonstrate spatially periodic firing, thought to provide a spatial map on behaviorally relevant length scales. Whether such periodicity exists for behaviorally relevant time scales in the human brain remains unclear.

We investigate neuronal firing during a temporally continuous experience by presenting 14 neurosurgical patients with a video while recording neuronal activity from multiple brain regions.

We report on neurons that modulate their activity in a periodic manner across different time scales—from seconds to many minutes, most prevalently in the entorhinal cortex. These neurons remap their dominant periodicity to shorter time scales during a subsequent recognition memory task.

When the video is presented at two different speeds, a significant percentage of these temporally periodic cells (TPCs) maintain their time scales, suggesting a degree of invariance.

The TPCs’ temporal periodicity might complement the spatial periodicity of grid cells and together provide scalable spatiotemporal metrics for human experience.

Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. Interesting concept but not difficult to understand. Our brains do this so naturally it is like breathing. some times it is more difficult than other times. But intuitively we preform easily. Or not.

  2. It’s becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman’s Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first.

    What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990’s and 2000’s. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I’ve encountered is anywhere near as convincing.

    I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there’s lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order.

    My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar’s lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman’s roadmap to a conscious machine is at https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

  3. Hello,

    Time = Timeless!
    Space = Spaceless!

    Think & Feel twice & vice versa!
    Good Luck!

    With kind regards,
    Berry Zomerveld (Netherlands)

Comments are closed.