Neuroscience research articles are provided.
What is neuroscience? Neuroscience is the scientific study of nervous systems. Neuroscience can involve research from many branches of science including those involving neurology, brain science, neurobiology, psychology, computer science, artificial intelligence, statistics, prosthetics, neuroimaging, engineering, medicine, physics, mathematics, pharmacology, electrophysiology, biology, robotics and technology.
– These articles focus mainly on neurology research. – What is neurology? – Definition of neurology: a science involved in the study of the nervous systems, especially of the diseases and disorders affecting them. – Neurology research can include information involving brain research, neurological disorders, medicine, brain cancer, peripheral nervous systems, central nervous systems, nerve damage, brain tumors, seizures, neurosurgery, electrophysiology, BMI, brain injuries, paralysis and spinal cord treatments.
What is Psychology? Definition of Psychology: Psychology is the study of behavior in an individual, or group. Psychology news articles are listed below.
Artificial Intelligence articles involve programming, neural engineering, artificial neural networks, artificial life, a-life, floyds, boids, emergence, machine learning, neuralbots, neuralrobotics, computational neuroscience and more involving A.I. research.
Robotics articles will cover robotics research press releases. Robotics news from universities, labs, researchers, engineers, students, high schools, conventions, competitions and more are posted and welcome.
Genetics articles related to neuroscience research will be listed here.
Neurotechnology research articles deal with robotics, AI, deep learning, machine learning, Brain Computer Interfaces, neuroprosthetics, neural implants and more. Read the latest neurotech news articles below.
Combining behavioral and physiologic measures depicts gradual process, may help diagnose sleep disorders.
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) investigators have developed a system to accurately track the dynamic process of falling asleep, something has not been possible with existing techniques. In their report in the October issue of the open-access journal PLOS Computational Biology, the research team describes how combining key physiologic measurements with a behavioral task that does not interfere with sleep onset gives a better picture of the gradual process of falling asleep. In addition to being a powerful tool for future research, the system could provide valuable insight into diagnosing and understanding sleep disorders.
“While our personal experience tells us that falling asleep is a gradual process, current clinical methods only define a single point in time at which one has fallen asleep,” says Michael Prerau, PhD, of the MGH Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, lead author of the report. “Our new research shows that it’s not simply when you fall asleep that’s important, it’s how you fall asleep that really matters. We now have the power to chart the entire trajectory of your neurological, physiological and behavioral activity as you transition from wake to asleep, rather than simply reporting the time it takes.”
In their report, the investigators describe developing a method that continuously estimates the degree to which an individual is awake at each point during the sleep onset process. “This is a real paradigm shift in the way we study sleep onset,” says Patrick Purdon, PhD, MGH Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management and senior author of the study. “By quantifying the dynamic changes in brain activity and behavior during the transition from wakefulness to sleep, we now have a rigorous framework with which to study disorders of sleep onset, such as insomnia or narcolepsy.”
To link changes in brain activity to loss of consciousness during sleep onset, the investigators developed a new, minimally disruptive means of tracking behavior as someone falls asleep. Earlier methods either used tasks in which a participant was asked to respond to auditory cues, something that could disrupt falling asleep, or actigraphy – the method of measuring movement used in most clinical sleep devices and consumer wearables, which cannot distinguish between sleep and motionless wakefulness. To get around these problems the investigators developed an ingenious new behavioral task that is accurate without disturbing sleep.
Instead of responding to a sound, a participant holds a small rubber “stress ball” in one hand and is asked to squeeze the ball with every intake of breath and release it when exhaling. A special glove on that hand and electrodes on the forearm measure both the timing and the force of each squeeze. In this way, the participant’s own breathing acts as the stimulus, and the squeezes act as the behavioral response. Tracking how well ball squeezes are aligned with an individual’s breathing reflects a gradual process during which more and more squeezes are mistimed or totally absent. Measuring the force exerted by the forearm muscle also reflects how the strength of the squeezing motion drops with sleep onset.
At the same time as the ball-squeeze measurements are taken, EEG readings track three brain wave patterns previously associated with falling asleep, decreasing power in the alpha frequency range and increasing power in delta and theta frequencies. The combination of all of these measures – the timing and strength of ball squeezes and the change in brain wave levels – is used to calculate what the investigators call the wake probability, an estimate of the degree to which a participant is awake during the process of sleep onset.
Testing their model in healthy volunteers over several nights not only provided more accurate results than did traditional methods of sleep determination, it also revealed differences in the way sleep onset occurs in different individuals. Current clinical criteria define sleep as beginning when the power of an individual’s alpha-range brainwaves disappears. While seven of the nine study participants followed this pattern, two participants continued to correctly time their ball squeezes for several minutes after alpha levels had dropped. Only when the power in their brainwaves at the theta and delta frequencies had risen did both the behavioral and physiological measures indicate that they were asleep.
“These participants continued to respond to the task, even though current clinical measures would say they were still asleep, which was clearly not the case,” says Prerau. “These results suggest that it is the presence of delta and theta power, rather than the lack of alpha power, that is necessary for the cessation of behavior. We may need to carefully re-examine the way sleep onset is defined, since behavior is an essential component of the story that is not measured clinically.”
By characterizing the trajectory of the sleep onset process in healthy individuals, Prerau and Purdon believe this study will ultimately shed light on what happens in patients who have trouble falling asleep, leading to an improved ability to understand and diagnose sleep disorders as well as to more precisely measure the effect of sleep medications. This method could also be used to track drowsiness in situations in which alertness is vital.
[divider]About this sleep research[/divider]
Prerau is an instructor of Anæsthesia, and Purdon is an assistant professor of Anæsthesia at Harvard Medical School. Additional co-authors are Katie Hartnack, Gabriel Obregon-Henao and Aaron Sampson, MGH Anesthesia; Margaret Merlino, Karen Gannon and Matt Bianchi, MD, PhD, MGH Department of Neurology; and Jeffrey M. Ellenbogen, MD, Johns Hopkins University. The study was supported by National Institutes of Health New Innovator Award DP2-OD006454.
Contact: Terri Ogan – Massachusetts General Hospital Source: Massachusetts General Hospital press release Image Source: The image is credited to Michael Prerau, PhD, MGH Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management and is adapted from the Mass General press release Original Research: Full open access research for “Tracking the Sleep Onset Process: An Empirical Model of Behavioral and Physiological Dynamics” by Michael J. Prerau, Katie E. Hartnack, Gabriel Obregon-Henao, Aaron Sampson, Margaret Merlino, Karen Gannon, Matt T. Bianchi, Jeffrey M. Ellenbogen, and Patrick L. Purdon in PLOS COmputational Biology. Published online October 2 2014 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003866
[divider]Open Access Neuroscience Abstract[/divider]
Tracking the Sleep Onset Process: An Empirical Model of Behavioral and Physiological Dynamics
The sleep onset process (SOP) is a dynamic process correlated with a multitude of behavioral and physiological markers. A principled analysis of the SOP can serve as a foundation for answering questions of fundamental importance in basic neuroscience and sleep medicine. Unfortunately, current methods for analyzing the SOP fail to account for the overwhelming evidence that the wake/sleep transition is governed by continuous, dynamic physiological processes. Instead, current practices coarsely discretize sleep both in terms of state, where it is viewed as a binary (wake or sleep) process, and in time, where it is viewed as a single time point derived from subjectively scored stages in 30-second epochs, effectively eliminating SOP dynamics from the analysis. These methods also fail to integrate information from both behavioral and physiological data. It is thus imperative to resolve the mismatch between the physiological evidence and analysis methodologies. In this paper, we develop a statistically and physiologically principled dynamic framework and empirical SOP model, combining simultaneously-recorded physiological measurements with behavioral data from a novel breathing task requiring no arousing external sensory stimuli. We fit the model using data from healthy subjects, and estimate the instantaneous probability that a subject is awake during the SOP. The model successfully tracked physiological and behavioral dynamics for individual nights, and significantly outperformed the instantaneous transition models implicit in clinical definitions of sleep onset. Our framework also provides a principled means for cross-subject data alignment as a function of wake probability, allowing us to characterize and compare SOP dynamics across different populations. This analysis enabled us to quantitatively compare the EEG of subjects showing reduced alpha power with the remaining subjects at identical response probabilities. Thus, by incorporating both physiological and behavioral dynamics into our model framework, the dynamics of our analyses can finally match those observed during the SOP.
“Tracking the Sleep Onset Process: An Empirical Model of Behavioral and Physiological Dynamics” by Michael J. Prerau, Katie E. Hartnack, Gabriel Obregon-Henao, Aaron Sampson, Margaret Merlino, Karen Gannon, Matt T. Bianchi, Jeffrey M. Ellenbogen, and Patrick L. Purdon in PLOS COmputational Biology. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003866.
[divider]Share this Psychology News[/divider]