Eating Red and Processed Meats, Even in Small Amounts, May Increase Death Risk

Summary: Combined total intake of both red and processed meat is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease deaths.

Source: Loma Linda University

A new study out of Loma Linda University Health suggests that eating red and processed meats — even in small amounts — may increase the risk of death from all causes, especially cardiovascular disease.

Saeed Mastour Alshahrani, the lead author of the study and a doctoral student at Loma Linda University School of Public Health, said the research fills an important gap left by previous studies that looked at relatively higher levels of red meat intake and compared them with low intakes.

“A question about the effect of lower levels of intakes compared to no-meat eating remained unanswered,” Alshahrani said. “We wanted to take a closer look at the association of low intakes of red and processed meat with all-cause, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer mortality compared to those who didn’t eat meat at all.”

This study, “Red and Processed Meat and Mortality in a Low Meat Intake Population” is part of the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2), a prospective cohort study of approximately 96,000 Seventh-day Adventist men and women in the United States and Canada. The principal investigator of AHS-2 is Gary E. Fraser, MD, Ph.D., professor of medicine and epidemiology at Loma Linda University Health.

Adventists are a unique population — approximately 50 percent are vegetarians, and those who consume meat do so at low levels. This allowed researchers to investigate the effect of low levels of red and processed meat intake compared to zero-intake in a large setting such as the Adventist Health Study.

The study evaluated the deaths of over 7,900 individuals over an 11-year period. Diet was assessed by a validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire and mortality outcome data were obtained from the National Death Index. Of those individuals who consumed meat, 90 percent of them only ate about two ounces or less of red meat per day.

This is a steak cooking in a pan
The total intake of red and processed meat was associated with relatively higher risks of total and cardiovascular disease deaths. The image is in the public domain.

Nearly 2,600 of the reported deaths were due to cardiovascular disease, and over 1,800 were cancer deaths. Processed meat — modified to improve flavor through curing, smoking, or salting (such as ham and salami) — alone was not significantly associated with risk of mortality possibly due to a very small proportion of the population who consume such meat. However, the total intake of red and processed meat was associated with relatively higher risks of total and cardiovascular disease deaths.

Michael Orlich, MD, Ph.D., co-director of AHS-2 and co-author of the present study, said these new findings support a significant body of research that affirms the potential ill health effects of red and processed meats.

“Our findings give additional weight to the evidence already suggesting that eating red and processed meat may negatively impact health and lifespan,” Orlich said.

About this neuroscience research article

Source:
Loma Linda University
Media Contacts:
Julia Milzer – Loma Linda University
Image Source:
The image is in the public domain.

Original Research: Open access.
Alshahrani, Saeed M.; Fraser, Gary E.; Sabaté, Joan; Knutsen, Raymond; Shavlik, David; Mashchak, Andrew; Lloren, Jan I.; Orlich, Michael J. 2019. “Red and Processed Meat and Mortality in a Low Meat Intake Population.” Nutrients 11, no. 3: 622. doi:10.3390/nu11030622

Abstract

Red and Processed Meat and Mortality in a Low Meat Intake Population

Associations of low-to-moderate consumption of red and processed meat with mortality would add to the evidence of possible adverse effects of these common foods. This study aims to investigate the association of red and processed meat intake with mortality. The Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) is a prospective cohort study of ~96,000 Seventh-day Adventist men and women recruited in the US and Canada between 2002 and 2007. The final analytic sample after exclusions was 72,149. Cox proportional hazards regression was used and hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) were obtained. Diet was assessed by a validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), calibrated using six 24-h dietary recalls. Mortality outcome data were obtained from the National Death Index. During a mean follow-up of 11.8 years, there were 7961 total deaths, of which 2598 were Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) deaths and 1873 were cancer deaths. Unprocessed red meat was associated with risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.07–1.31) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.05–1.50). Processed meat alone was not significantly associated with risk of mortality. The combined intake of red and processed meat was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11–1.36) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.12–1.60). These findings suggest moderately higher risks of all-cause and CVD mortality associated with red and processed meat in a low meat intake population.

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.
Join our Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )
Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.
We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.
  1. Some day I would love to see a study comparing eating quality home grown meat versus factory-farmed meat. I do believe that factory farmed meat that is pumped full of antibiotics and where the animals aren’t given any kind of natural life is bad for one’s health. I don’t believe that the organic meat that I raise on my farm is bad for me.

  2. This is just more anti-meat propaganda made by and for the vegan cult. How about you stop producing the lowest quality research and give us some RCTs to mull over, hmm, I wonder why, because your research would get turned on its head.

    This vegan movement is damaging to Human health and for the environment. It’s being pushed by those companies that benefit from industrial farms that will one day cover our landscape whilst everyone is forced into urban environments. This will take us right to the edge of disaster and probably beyond it.

    I’d love to see some researchers really trying to dig into the truth rather than produce poor quality cr*p like this for their paymasters. Shame on you.

  3. Humans have been eating meat for thousands of years. Seems like someone would have figured out before now if it were bad for you.

    Therefore I call total BS on this article. I must assume the researchers are Vegans and have lots of “meat is murder” paraphernalia. I must also assume they believe that cows cause global warming. Even though if people weren’t around to eat them there would still be wild cattle belching and farting……

    What a steaming load of horse hocky……

Comments are closed.